Do not judge me by my looks!
Posted on 02/09/2014 9:26:46 AM PST by Errant
Parenthetical clauses are used throughout scripture to explain how, why, when and where in close proximity to the main subject and verb.
Parentheses in the book of The Revelation explain cause and effect. They tie together the events that happen previously, to the events that transpire subsequently on the prophetic timeline. Unfortunately, parentheses, as a literary devise, come centuries after the actual parenthetical clauses so prevalent in both Hebrew and Greek linguistic constructions. Because of their late arrival into the English language, the parentheticals in the book of The Revelation have never been either deservedly researched or accurately articulated. Now, after more than 40 years in the making, The Chronological Gospels is complete with all of the extensive parenthetical clauses accurately assigned throughout the book of The Revelation.
Now, with its impending fulfillment looming large on the horizon, The Revelation can finally be understood with clarity and lived with integrity. This one feature (the parenthetical clauses in The Revelation) in The Chronological Gospels is worth one thousand times the price of the book itself.
Join Michael Rood for the first of the last four teachings on the very last book of the Bible, “Parenthetically Speaking (Before We Are Saved From the Wrath To Come)”.
Stick your head up out of it once in awhile, why don't you?!!!
True, but that ain't what we were talking about, I thought...
>>>Stick your head up out of it once in awhile, why don’t you?!!!<<<
What? And become a Rood Cultie? No thanks.
You'll find plenty of company in here when it comes to opposing a little edification about the false doctrines of western churchainity then.
And while we're on the subject, what exactly do you think Michael Rood had to do with the "church" getting the pronunciation of Yeshua wrong?
Or is it that you just oppose the truth being brought into the light; you must prefer the dark?
Do not judge me by my looks!
I thought this thread was about ERROR...
I really wish the CORRECT tunes would be REVEALED to the various Psalms...
But after Romans 2, you're blind as a bat coming in backwards...But I understand, the bible tells us that's what happens to you guys...
You have have been inundated with scripture that proves you wrong...
It is pure ignorance to think God left his church in darkness until you geniuses figured out what God really says...And then, you claim that is is revealed in a Hebrew version of the New Testament that never existed prior to the Dark Ages...
You then try to claim that faith and belief don't really mean when they mean and you have been proven wrong on those as well
You admittedly don't believe Jesus is God...You may as well be atheists or muzlims...
You reject God's words and you follow a known false prophet who if you really believed what yo claim, you would be out there with a pile of rocks stoning the guy, to death...
Phonies...UnChristian, unsaved phonies...
Your clamoring will have no effect whatsoever on a single, Spirit filled, born again Christian...
Rood wouldn’t know the true scripture of the one true God if it hit him between the eyes. Ask him about his MIV
Here’s his statement.
"...in 1762 the KJV was revised for the fifth time to include italicized words which denote most times when words were added to the text without corresponding verbiage in the original Hebrew or Greek. That was an invaluable addition to their original work, and I use the same protocol when I translate the Scriptures. My translation is referred to as the MIV or the Marine Infantry Version, as I began my serious study of Scripture during my time of serving with the United States Marine Corps. I am one of the few, if not the only Marine whose job was to study and teach the Bible. I take my free-translation of the Scriptures very seriously, but I do it only for my personal understanding and enjoyment of the Word. I recommend that every one writes his own version of every sentence that they study in the Scriptures. ..."[ http://www.seekgod.ca/roodteachings.htm#2]
So when Roodites say he takes his beliefs “100% from scripture” it ain’t the same scripture that the Holy Spirit inspired. Think I’m kidding? Here’s a verse from his website [http://roodawakening.blogspot.com/2008/05/counting-omer.html] with reference to his MIV translation.
"Not forsaking the assembling of ourselves together (to celebrate the Feasts of the LORD), as the manner of some (spiritual deadbeat) is, but encourage and strengthen each other more and more as you see the day (of His return) approaching" (Hebrews 10:25 MIV).
His additions are in parenthesis. Here’s the verse directly translated from the Greek.
Hebrews 10:25 not forsaking the assembling of ourselves together, as a custom of certain is, but exhorting, and so much the more as ye see the day coming nigh.
So when Rood and his followers say the follow scripture understand it’s not the original scripture inspired by the Holy Spirit.
Nope: how GOD sees you.
>>>And while we’re on the subject, what exactly do you think Michael Rood had to do with the “church” getting the pronunciation of Yeshua wrong?<<<
Are you and Rood Jehovah Witnesses?
Are those the new Mormon underwear? Ya know, to protect from demons or something.
>> “You have have been inundated with scripture that proves you wrong.” <<
.
You’ve yet to post any.
>> “It is pure ignorance to think God left his church in darkness until you geniuses figured out what God really says.” <<
.
Your error there is compound. First, nothing I have ever posted indicates such a belief. Most of what you unilaterally assume to be “church” is surely in darkness, but Yeshua has had his remnant on Earth at all times. He showed his disciples that they were “few” and surrounded with tares that would be revealed at harvest.
The Hebrew original copies that so irk you have obviously been in the possession of ‘somebody’ in the case of each of the 28 MS so far found. Since Papias declared that Matthew’s gospel was prepared in the native language and translated “as best they could” by others, your rant is shown to be childish emotion, rather than fact.
That you desire for intellectual belief to be saving is in no way surprising, but NT scriptures admonish that Satan and his angels so believe “and tremble.” Belief has to be full and deep to have the meaning used by Yeshua and his apostles. In the case of each of them they substantiated that fact by declaring that “doers of the law” would be justified.
>> “You admittedly don’t believe Jesus is God.” <<
.
Your insertion of that known lie to strengthen your ethereal case yields all we need to know about you, as a person. Why would anyone go any further with you?
>> “You reject God’s words...” <<
Nowhere that you’ve been able to show, I post his word profusely in this thread, to your total chagrin.
>> “and you follow a known false prophet...” <<
An accusation that you’ve yet to be able to substantiate with anything but the ravings of charlatans.
Pee your pants all you wish; it is what should be expected in such an easy-believer as yourself.
.
You still don’t understand the difference between the word “on” and the word “that”?
James 2:19 Thou believest that there is one God; thou doest well: the devils also believe, and tremble.
Acts 16:31 And they said, Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and thou shalt be saved, and thy house.
I have always considered someone who makes that statement is so illiterate to what words mean that anything they state as there belief is shaky at best.
>> “You still don’t understand the difference between the word “on” and the word “that”?” <<
.
Wrong distinction.
Believing ON Yeshua means accepting every word and premise he gave us, and the empty grace gang falls thousands of words recorded in the gospels short of that level of belief.
Empty gracers clearly believe that much of what Yeshua, and his apostles have said has to be false, or they would firmly accept his Torah.
.
That from someone who can’t distinguish the difference between “on” and “that”. LOL
>> “ THIS is beyond the pale!!! “ <<
.
Alas, you are right :o(
.
I knew that your response would completely ignore the subject and attempt to make an issue of some frivolous diversion.
That is the way you reply when you have to admit your error but refuse to do so.
.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.