Posted on 02/09/2014 9:26:46 AM PST by Errant
Parenthetical clauses are used throughout scripture to explain how, why, when and where in close proximity to the main subject and verb.
Parentheses in the book of The Revelation explain cause and effect. They tie together the events that happen previously, to the events that transpire subsequently on the prophetic timeline. Unfortunately, parentheses, as a literary devise, come centuries after the actual parenthetical clauses so prevalent in both Hebrew and Greek linguistic constructions. Because of their late arrival into the English language, the parentheticals in the book of The Revelation have never been either deservedly researched or accurately articulated. Now, after more than 40 years in the making, The Chronological Gospels is complete with all of the extensive parenthetical clauses accurately assigned throughout the book of The Revelation.
Now, with its impending fulfillment looming large on the horizon, The Revelation can finally be understood with clarity and lived with integrity. This one feature (the parenthetical clauses in The Revelation) in The Chronological Gospels is worth one thousand times the price of the book itself.
Join Michael Rood for the first of the last four teachings on the very last book of the Bible, “Parenthetically Speaking (Before We Are Saved From the Wrath To Come)”.
Hypocrisy is not a part of Yeshua’s Way.
He said let your Yea be yea, and your Nea be nea.
.
SURE they were!!
The Torah Jonah Code is all about Yeshua; Raider's of the Lost Book is all about Yeshua to name just a couple.
Thanks,
I was talking about Noah Hutchings.
.
You are hiding in major denial.
You need to spend some time reading the Prophets, all of them, to get a grip on what the House of Israel’s offense was.
.
LOL, well you caused me to correct something that needed correcting anyway... ;)
Btw, I agree on Noah.
Thanks again!
Gal 1:6 I marvel that ye are so soon removed from him that called you into the grace of Christ unto another gospel:
Gal 1:7 Which is not another; but there be some that trouble you, and would pervert the gospel of Christ.
Gal 1:8 But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed.
Gal 1:9 As we said before, so say I now again, If any man preach any other gospel unto you than that ye have received, let him be accursed.
Eph 2:8 For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God: Eph 2:9 Not of works, lest any man should boast.
Joh 5:24 Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that heareth my word, and believeth on him that sent me, hath everlasting life, and shall not come into condemnation; but is passed from death unto life.
Rom_10:13 For whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved.
Rom 5:15 But not as the offence, so also is the free gift. For if through the offence of one many be dead, much more the grace of God, and the gift by grace, which is by one man, Jesus Christ, hath abounded unto many.
Rom 5:16 And not as it was by one that sinned, so is the gift: for the judgment was by one to condemnation, but the free gift is of many offences unto justification.
Rom 5:17 For if by one man's offence death reigned by one; much more they which receive abundance of grace and of the gift of righteousness shall reign in life by one, Jesus Christ.)
Rom 5:18 Therefore as by the offence of one judgment came upon all men to condemnation; even so by the righteousness of one the free gift came upon all men unto justification of life.
Your unbelief has you condemned...
Your apparent claim is that the New Testament has been misunderstood for the 2000 years that God has been spreading it around the word for lost people...And now, in the last days, God reveals the bible to some guy who wears a costume like a pope... In your view the NT is just a continuation of the Old...Why then do we have a 2 testament bible...Why not just one???
If you and Rood had even a clue what the bible is about, you'd know that what Rood is preaching is Kingdom of Heaven stuff which will be preached by the 144,000 during the Tribulation...
Doctrinally, you have completely missed the Church Age...That's why the Pauline epistles are pretty much useless to you guys...
Where you are really off the mark is that we ARE in the Church Age and Roods teaching and preaching does not apply yet which makes Rood a false prophet with a false gospel...
Rood's teaching during the Church Age will do nothing except send people to Hell...
You are promoting that different gospel from the one that Yeshua and Paul preached, without question.
It is the Gospel of Iniquity that you promote.
Iniquity is the state of being Without the Teaching, or Torah, to use the Hebrew word.
Thus you have invited the curse that pervades your life, and especially your future.
The verses that you ignorantly posted indict you through his word. It is especially incriminating that you have yanked them out of their context to attempt to hide their full meaning.
Go with your Father who will admire your work of hiding Yehova’s word. He loves your lies because he is the inventor of them. Like Father, like son.
.
>> “Your apparent claim is that the New Testament has been misunderstood for the 2000 years...” <<
.
Deliberate or accidental misquote?
The decay has been advancing for about 1700 years, but he has always had a remnant that has held his truth. AS he said of his Way, “Few there be that find it.”
.
There's the five letter "FAITH" word again that everyone tosses about with little or no consideration to what it implies...
Then why not tell us what faith really is...Along with that, show what the 'free gift' is...
How 'bout letting me ask the questions for awhile...
What does it mean to You?
“Not to make this about the man, but your statements prove you know even less about his teachings than you do about his predictions or about the man himself.”
The links presented originally in this thread, detailing his teachings and history, his shady practices and origins from a religious cult, are pretty definitive. He is a huckster, and we’ve seen this story many times before. Joseph Smith, Herbert Armstrong, Charles Russell, the Moonies, etc etc., it’s always the same old same old.
Why don’t you go grab the rest of the post you clipped so we have the context it was used in, then we’ll discuss it.
The huckster would appear to be you.
When someone preaches the full pure gospel of Yeshua, as Rood totally does, they are not to be called a huckster.
The partial-posting empty gracers here are worse than hucksters; they are total deceivers. Are you here to shore them up?
.
Stupidity. If grace is given according to our merits or as a reward for our continued merits, then it is no longer grace. Grace is, by definition, gratuitous, given without regard for works, but, indeed, inspite of them.
Rom_4:4 Now to him that worketh is the reward not reckoned of grace, but of debt.
Rom 11:6 And if by grace, then is it no more of works: otherwise grace is no more grace. But if it be of works, then is it no more grace: otherwise work is no more work.
Rom 11:35 Or who hath first given to him, and it shall be recompensed unto him again?
God's unmerited favor, His grace, is that which brings us to Christ, and, having given us to Christ, preserves us infallibly, through His almighty power. The gift of perseverance is entirely God's, and does not originate in man.
"no man can say that Jesus is the Lord, but by the Holy Ghost" (1 Co 12:3).
"no man can come unto me, except it were given unto him of my Father" (John 6:65)
"All that the Father giveth me shall come to me; and him that cometh to me I will in no wise cast out" (John 6:37)
Php_1:6 Being confident of this very thing, that he which hath begun a good work in you will perform it until the day of Jesus Christ:
This "giving of grace", again, which precedes our conversion, is not based on any foreseen works, either good or evil, but in His unfathomable will alone.
"And not only this; but when Rebecca also had conceived by one, even by our father Isaac; (For the children being not yet born, neither having done any good or evil, that the purpose of God according to election might stand, not of works, but of him that calleth;) It was said unto her, The elder shall serve the younger. As it is written, Jacob have I loved, but Esau have I hated. What shall we say then? Is there unrighteousness with God? God forbid. For he saith to Moses, I will have mercy on whom I will have mercy, and I will have compassion on whom I will have compassion. So then it is not of him that willeth, nor of him that runneth, but of God that sheweth mercy." (Rom 9:10-16)
Therefore, any attempt by Judaizers, Romanists, or any other foul group, cannot steal away the Christian from the grace of God to force him under the yoke of bondage. We, who are alive in Christ, are free from the law, and though we obey God's will, as it is God who "works in us both to will and to do of His good pleasure," it does not save us, but God's grace alone does, which conforms us to His image. Works, therefore, are the result of salvation, and not its cause. Though these works that we do, we don't do them perfectly, or Paul would have been in hell for his frequent falls.
Joh_15:16 Ye have not chosen me, but I have chosen you, and ordained you, that ye should go and bring forth fruit, and that your fruit should remain: that whatsoever ye shall ask of the Father in my name, he may give it you.
Php_2:13 For it is God which worketh in you both to will and to do of his good pleasure.
Eph_2:10 For we are his workmanship, created in Christ Jesus unto good works, which God hath before ordained that we should walk in them.
"O wretched man that I am! who shall deliver me from the body of this death? I thank God through Jesus Christ our Lord. So then with the mind I myself serve the law of God; but with the flesh the law of sin." (Rom 7:24-25)
Lastly, the form of these works that we do is not in the form of the useless things the Judaizers promote, as all that has passed away, since we are no longer under the "old" covenant, but a new one. And we may eat what we please, or not celebrate feast days if we please, and go without being circumcised.
"Behold, the days come, saith the LORD, that I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel, and with the house of Judah: Not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers in the day that I took them by the hand to bring them out of the land of Egypt; which my covenant they brake, although I was an husband unto them, saith the LORD: But this shall be the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel; After those days, saith the LORD, I will put my law in their inward parts, and write it in their hearts; and will be their God, and they shall be my people." (Jer 31:31-33)
"For every creature of God is good, and nothing to be refused, if it be received with thanksgiving: For it is sanctified by the word of God and prayer." (1Ti 4:4-5)
Rom_14:5 One man esteemeth one day above another: another esteemeth every day alike. Let every man be fully persuaded in his own mind.
Gal_5:3 For I testify again to every man that is circumcised, that he is a debtor to do the whole law.
The post he responded to was the one in which you had mis-titled one of the Rood videos, wasn’t it?
If you’re here to make the same false gospel empty grace noise that they do, you’ll get the same needed teaching.
And a sophist you do appear to be.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.