HER NAME HAS BEEN HIDDEN.
Posted on 07/30/2013 9:03:55 AM PDT by Cold Case Posse Supporter
Lt. Mike Zullo, lead investigator of Sheriff Joe Arpaio's Cold Case Posse with the Maricopa County Sheriff's Office has revealed new information in his investigation of Obama's birth. He revealed that he has a source 'in a position to know' has confirmed that 'there was no birth' of Barack Obama at Kapi'olani Hospital in Honolulu, HI on August 4, 1961. That would call into question the comments made by former Hawaii Governor Linda Lingle on May 2, 2010. In a nationally syndicated radio broadcast on the Rusty Humphries show, Lingle told the audience:
"So I had my health director, who is a physician by background, go personally view the birth certificate in the birth records of the Department of Health, and we issued a news release at that time saying that the president was, in fact, born at Kapi’olani Hospital in Honolulu, Hawaii. And that’s just a fact and yet people continue to call up and e-mail and want to make it an issue and I think it’s again a horrible distraction for the country by those people who continue this.”
Even though Lingle claimed she issued a news release stating Kapi’olani is Obama’s birthplace, the actual release said no such thing, making no reference to Kapi’olani nor any other specific location of Obama’s birth. On the other hand, Linda Lingles successor Neil Abercrombie was never able to verify Obama had a long form birth certificate. His investigation into the matter conflicts with Lingles attempt. Albercrombie only suggested his investigation had identified an unspecified listing or notation of Obama’s birth that someone had made in the state archives.
“It was actually written, I am told, this is what our investigation is showing, it actually exists in the archives, written down,”
Continued below
(Excerpt) Read more at youtube.com ...
How would I know? She wasn’t meant to be found, there’s no Seattle story in ‘Dreams’ - I think she was the student whose parents complained to the student advisor in Hawaii, she was probably the one enrolled at the U of HI for FALL 1960, and used the address of the Dunham & Pratt family as ANN S OBAMA.
The only person who I think does know her name would be Sally Jacobs, who had the unredacted INS file for two years...and all we have seen is the redacted file.
It would have been her parents who threatened to have him thrown out of the university, according to Zeituni, the Obama Aunt who was at home in Kenya when the letter arrived from the kenyan in which he said that her family didn’t want a black for a son-in-law.
That’s why the memo for the adoption was truncated IMO. Anna’s parents would have tried to persuade her to have the child adopted when it was about three months old.
THE ADOPTION MEMO REFERS TO ARRANGEMENTS THAT WERE DISCUSSED IN APRIL 1961.
I have no idea. All I do know is that the kenyan, when he did finally arrive at Harvard in September 1962, lived at 170 Magazine Street, which was a hop-skip-jump from 72 Dale Street Roxbury, and he told his Harvard associates about visiting HIS SON.
But the article in which he is reported to have made that comment has become elusive...I can’t find it again. Maybe someone interested would care to help me locate it?
I know it was there only a few weeks ago, but stupidly, I didn’t keep the link.
http://htmlimg4.scribdassets.com/52d3a0f0w0xubz8/images/21-ea011ad90c.jpg
http://www.scribd.com/doc/54015762/Barack-Hussein-Obama-Sr-Immigration-File
you can’t do people’s work for them, the material is all there for anyone who cares to look
HER NAME HAS BEEN HIDDEN.
Although they were married, Mr. Dahlin referred to Stanley Ann as “Ann Dunham” and “MISS Dunham”? Obama Sr. got his USC wife pregnant. So which USC wife would that be–the one who lived in Hawaii with her parents (allegedly Stanley Ann Dunham) or the USC wife who lived in the Philippines? Which wife was giving a child up for adoption? Could the adoptive mother perhaps be the wife in Hawaii, adopting the child of the wife in the Philippines, as we’ve sometimes speculated?
Hmm, very interesting. I hadn’t thought of that possibility. That is, SAD adopting the child who was named after the Kenyan’s son? She would have had no reason to adopt the child originally named BHO. And that brings to mind another oddiity, and that is how so many of these apparently disparate actors had connections, some of them going back for quite some years, actually years coming and going.
THE ADOPTION MEMO REFERS TO ARRANGEMENTS THAT WERE DISCUSSED IN APRIL 1961.
When the man in the WH was not born yet, according to his story. And also according to the Blake story of seeing SAD with a 3 week old baby in August 1961.
The “story” is only believable if a person makes no attempt to use their brain at all, and realizes that the dates are ALL WRONG and do not agree with each other. It’s clearly a made up hash of a few factoids mixed with fairy tale propaganda. A made up life.
Thank you for your excellent research.
And under the purpose of a search warrant:
The power of granting this writ is one in the exercise of which much is necessarily left to the discretion of the magistrate, but, except in cases where this power is elsewhere specially granted by statute, search warrants can be granted only for the following purposes:
(1) To seize any article or thing the possession of which is prohibited by law;
(2) To discover property taken by theft or under false pretenses, or found and fraudulently appropriated;
(3) To seize forged instruments in writing, or counterfeit coin intended to be passed, or the instruments or materials prepared for making them;
(4) To seize arms or munitions prepared for the purpose of insurrection or riot;
(5) To discover articles necessary to be produced as evidence or otherwise on the trial of any one accused of a criminal offense. [PC 1869, c 48, §3; am L 1876, c 52, §1; RL 1925, §3960; am L Sp 1933, c 16, §1; RL 1935, §5412; RL 1945, §10717; RL 1955, §255-17; HRS §708-32; ren L 1972, c 9, pt of §1]
Case Notes
Prior to Hawaii Rules of Criminal Procedure.
None of those meet Abercrombie’s aim. Might have met Zullo’s goals but he never pursued the legal avenues.
I think I’ve provided enough grist for the mind-mill for one day and one thread. I’m taking a break.
The child who was named after the kenyan...was up for adoption when he was about three months old in April 1961, is how I read that. And if that TRUNCATED NAME is Miss Dunham, she would have been the person ADOPTING THE CHILD OF ANNA AND THE KENYAN.
But until you know the name of the person which has been TRUNCATED, it's an open question.
That name might have been Danton for all we know, as AN EXAMPLE ONLY. Is that first vowel an 'a' or is it a 'u'? Is the letter after the 'n' an 'l', a 't' or an 'h'?
There is a reason why that name has been obscured, it took that woman two years to write that book. And no wonder. What a mine-field the unredacted documents must have been. And we STILL HAVE NOT SEEN THE UNREDACTED FILE.
“she was probably the one enrolled at the U of HI for FALL 1960, and used the address of the Dunham & Pratt family as ANN S OBAMA.”
What are your reasons for her doing that?
I meant why she used their address?
from the same link:
But WHY do they do these things habitually? WHY do they crop the image? How does that sentence REALLY read? Is it as Ms. Jacobs tells us or is it otherwise?
Could the USC wife and Miss Dunham be different individuals? The wife being the one giving the baby up to the adoptive mother, MISS Dunham? (Or perhaps not DunHAM at all, but Dun? or DAn?.)
Of course, the top of the memo speaks of his supposed marriage to Stanley Ann (Dunham, which we know from the Smathers version) of Washington state, but wasn’t she of Hawaii at that point?
Ms. Jacobs says that the memo reads, “got his USC wife ‘Hapai’ and although they were married they do not live together and Miss Dun…”
Might it really say, “got his USC wife ‘Hapai’ before they were married they do not live together and Miss D…”?
Or “got his USC wife ‘Hapai’ so they never were married they do not live together and Miss D…”
Punctuation is required but missing in all possible versions. Notice how Miss D, whoever she is, appears to be the subject of the rest of the sentence, about how she “is making arrangements” with the Salvation Army. But is that the correct transcription?
Does “is making arrangements” fit on that line? Doesn’t seem so to me. Might it say, “made arrangements?” In which case, it was a done deal?
So what did Miss D do with the Salvation Army? Although the story spins this as if it’s BHO’s doing, Miss D is the person making the arrangements to give the child up. Does this fit with the meme of Stanley Ann Dunham (Ann Obama or MRS. Obama) being a strong type who would not be coerced by anyone, but who would bravely keep her bi-racial child? Doesn’t sound like to me.
Miss D? Could this story at WND provide a clue? Their expert points out that the mother’s signature on Obama’s LFCOLB is in two layers: “(Stanley Ann) D” and “unham Obama”.
Now is the time to take a good hard look at the forged LFBC. It’s obvious. The name of the mother was Ann D.....something to which ‘unham’ was added, and the addition of Obama completed the signature.
Goodnight.
You would need to ask Ann S Obama why. Methinks she moved to the Philippines and was there when Stanley Ann Dunham made a flying emergency visit in 1986.
Better yet, ask the U of HI for her enrollment data and ID. That should tell you who Ann S Obama, the student was.
” If that was Miss Dunham in that memo, was Miss Dunham arranging to adopt the child of Anna and the Kenyan?”
How does Valerie Saruff fit in?
Two layers make a name.
She doesn’t fit in, not yet. We are talking about April 1961, get your head around that. It’s still months before Susan is telling us she was visited by her classmate with a baby who was three weeks of age, which she was taking to Boston.
I’m closing down. That will give you time to think.
“Better yet, ask the U of HI for her enrollment data and ID. That should tell you who Ann S Obama, the student was.”
Do you know of any attempts by anyone to look for her enrollment data? If not why do you think they haven’t
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.