Hmm, very interesting. I hadn’t thought of that possibility. That is, SAD adopting the child who was named after the Kenyan’s son? She would have had no reason to adopt the child originally named BHO. And that brings to mind another oddiity, and that is how so many of these apparently disparate actors had connections, some of them going back for quite some years, actually years coming and going.
The child who was named after the kenyan...was up for adoption when he was about three months old in April 1961, is how I read that. And if that TRUNCATED NAME is Miss Dunham, she would have been the person ADOPTING THE CHILD OF ANNA AND THE KENYAN.
But until you know the name of the person which has been TRUNCATED, it's an open question.
That name might have been Danton for all we know, as AN EXAMPLE ONLY. Is that first vowel an 'a' or is it a 'u'? Is the letter after the 'n' an 'l', a 't' or an 'h'?
There is a reason why that name has been obscured, it took that woman two years to write that book. And no wonder. What a mine-field the unredacted documents must have been. And we STILL HAVE NOT SEEN THE UNREDACTED FILE.
from the same link:
But WHY do they do these things habitually? WHY do they crop the image? How does that sentence REALLY read? Is it as Ms. Jacobs tells us or is it otherwise?
Could the USC wife and Miss Dunham be different individuals? The wife being the one giving the baby up to the adoptive mother, MISS Dunham? (Or perhaps not DunHAM at all, but Dun? or DAn?.)
Of course, the top of the memo speaks of his supposed marriage to Stanley Ann (Dunham, which we know from the Smathers version) of Washington state, but wasn’t she of Hawaii at that point?
Ms. Jacobs says that the memo reads, “got his USC wife ‘Hapai’ and although they were married they do not live together and Miss Dun…”
Might it really say, “got his USC wife ‘Hapai’ before they were married they do not live together and Miss D…”?
Or “got his USC wife ‘Hapai’ so they never were married they do not live together and Miss D…”
Punctuation is required but missing in all possible versions. Notice how Miss D, whoever she is, appears to be the subject of the rest of the sentence, about how she “is making arrangements” with the Salvation Army. But is that the correct transcription?
Does “is making arrangements” fit on that line? Doesn’t seem so to me. Might it say, “made arrangements?” In which case, it was a done deal?
So what did Miss D do with the Salvation Army? Although the story spins this as if it’s BHO’s doing, Miss D is the person making the arrangements to give the child up. Does this fit with the meme of Stanley Ann Dunham (Ann Obama or MRS. Obama) being a strong type who would not be coerced by anyone, but who would bravely keep her bi-racial child? Doesn’t sound like to me.
Miss D? Could this story at WND provide a clue? Their expert points out that the mother’s signature on Obama’s LFCOLB is in two layers: “(Stanley Ann) D” and “unham Obama”.
Now is the time to take a good hard look at the forged LFBC. It’s obvious. The name of the mother was Ann D.....something to which ‘unham’ was added, and the addition of Obama completed the signature.
Goodnight.