Posted on 06/10/2013 7:07:39 PM PDT by Seizethecarp
Audio PART FOUR @00:18 "This Barry...he's not an American, I can tell you that right now. The information that I was given, he's not an American. He's not even Kenyan and I'm tellin' you that when you find out what he is, your blood is gonna boil. The American people are gonna go absolutely crazy if Congress doesn't do something about this cause he's not Kenyan and he's not American. ...There's no record of him prior to the age of five anywhere in this country. Nowhere. The people that...that they say are his parents, guess what? They're not his real parents. They're not. I've seen the evidence. I've seen the evidence and I give kudos to Mike Zullo and Joe Arpaio because Joe took this bull by the horns and ran with it.
(Excerpt) Read more at obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com ...
I understand they are working methodically. I understand they have recently received information. All the same, they need to move more quickly.
They could go to DC and meet/attempt to meet/deliver info to every single member of Congress. They could host several presentations and invite every single member of Congress to attend one of their presentations. Two weeks tops.
We don’t have six months. The strategy is being overtaken by events. They’ve got to pick up the pace.
Good points about the supposed buddy-ship between Stanley Dunham and FMD. Anything that is strongly pushed (and thickly embroidered with details) in “Dreams” is naturally suspect.
Like the “incident” with Sr dangling some guy off the cliff for touching his pipe, and the bar scene with Donald Duck porn paintings and little Zero drinking soda at the bar.
Such scenes read like a movie script, entirely false, contrived, and inserted to make specific points. Provide realistic color? To make his “life” seem real and alive, like a corpse hooked up to electricity? And also to emplace things that might be useful later, like supposedly having Madelyn Dunham being called “Toot”.
Most likely a departure picture. Otherwise how would Stanley have known some random Kenyan student just hitting the beach unless you don a second tin foil hat? That gal beside Sr. is probably this Anna as seen in the below picture. There are others who look as if they appear in both pictures.
“Zero” - someone whose birth name is unknown, father unkonwn, mother unknown, place of birth unknown, date of birht unknown, nationality unknown.
Let’s see some evidence.
I certainly hope they are picking up the pace.
Why is Sr the same height as Stanley Dunham? And why does the face of SR in that photo exactly match in every respect the face of SR in the airport photo? Phil Dragoo I think is the one who figured that out. That means one of the two photos is shopped totally.
I had applied for a job recently that required a BACKGROUND check that in NO WAY, shape or form, could the Agitator-in-Chief have passed. He would have FAILED almost all of it.
She obviously didn't tell Sr.'s friends on campus because in Rememberances they didn't have a clue about a bundle of joy until the election.
He is supporting amnesty for illegals so he can become a citizen.
That’s the pick. Sr. with the flowers stacked up.
The peace sign is interesting. Didn’t that start being “in-vogue” in the mid to late 60’s?
yup!
Since the divorce court judge referenced in his decree exact details of the marriage, he most likely saw a copy of the marriage license before granting the divorce. That would be standard operating procedure. It is pretty rare for people to go through the trouble and expense of a divorce if they were never really married.
As for me, I haven’t seen the marriage license for any president’s parents.
Hawaii is not a Common-law marriage state, it was outlawed there in 1920, and you don’t need a divorce to terminate an informal “marriage.”
I’m thinking “shotgun marriage” for appearances with a knocked up bride followed by a quickie divorce so that Ann could legally marry Lolo Soetoro.
Born in Suadi.....Raised in Maui?
Possible. But lets move to broader reason for no valid Hawaii Birth Certificate being issued. Why would Hawaii NOT issue a legally valid BC with a legally valid number that would be used on all later documents - official or forged?
Possible answers
Door #1:
There ALREADY was a NON-HAWAII BC for the child regardless of biological parentage. To grant a legal divorce and clean up a family mess the court would not need a HAWAII BC if one from somewhere else already existed. So....no valid matching and unique Hawaii BC #. Hence the need to steal one.
Door #2:
Hawaii DID issue a Hawaiian BC but in 1964. As such would it have a 64 xxxxx number? I am not up on that level of detail of how Hawaii would issue a ‘late’ BC. Would the first two digits match the documented birth year or would the first two digits match WHEN THE DOCUMENT WAS CREATED FOR THE FIRST TIME? I have no idea.
Door #3:
Combination of Door #1 and Door #2. There was a valid, non-Hawaiian BC available but to keep the newly baselined records ‘clean’ they issued a Hawaii-specific one.
Any one of these scenarios leads to a need to obtain a 61 xxxxx number that is not valid or is not matched to Obama when it was issued.
If #2 or #3 are correct then that would mean that is likely an Obama BC ‘twin’ in the records - with a 64 xxxxx number or maybe a 71 xxxxx number or some other number that is NOT starting with 61 as it should. The way Hawaii officials have issued statements there must be SOME TYPE of valid record for Obama on file. But would it start with ‘61’ if it were issued later on? Or would it start with something else and if provided or even used in forgeries would its disclosure ripe the narrative apart once and for all?
I don’t put much cred on John Doe or Mary Smith having much accurate info on Ancestry.com. Anyone can put whatever they wish on there. I’d believe Wikipedia before Ancestry for factual info. That link even says the guy might have been mistaken on the Toots name and then threw in the Peace Corps out of the blue. If there ever was a site which Soros & Co. would immediately try to create a family history for little Barry, that would be it. I ain’t biting.
You may be right. He’s already partaking in the freebie trips courtesy of we taxpayers.
There are photos available of Barry for practically every year of his life.
He’s at least had the same face since high school.
http://www.punahou.edu/page.cfm?p=1786
I hope they are too.
Perhaps a different approach would be to provide the information to all members of Congress (House & Senate), allow a period wherein questions could be addressed or Congressional actions taken, but make clear that the information will be public by date X, say 5 days in the future. No more than 10 days.
Congress members can take whatever action the info warrants.
If that info is that Obama is not an American, “will make your blood boil” etc, then we will know which Congress members speak up & which do not.
If that info is exaggerated, well we’ll know that too.
Six months of strategery is not a luxury we can afford. I know they’re not stupid, I know they have a plan. We’re out of time.
He and his fellow leftists/elites/mozlems/homosexuals are above the law, and we are all fodder to be ground up.
I have read (and maybe Cold Case can remembers more) of Zullo and Arpaio making presentations pretty recently to some Congressmen.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.