[Diogenesis]

But, of course.

The corrupt pro-al Qaeda US Senate wants Laws to
suppress Americans and make THEMSELVES RICHER.

A few in the Senate belongs in prison
for misprision of felony and production of false
documents (Pelosi), and for allowing treason,
and a sell-out of the American people.

[muir_redwoods]

Maybe July 4th would be a good day to post millions of vicious anti-muslim comments across the nation. We need to exercise our rights if we are to keep them

[SampleMan]

The 1st Amendment? Why yes, press, speech, and religion. But so too are the 2nd, 4th, and 5th. The 6th and 7th aren't absolute. If you consider what the various agencies commit against the average citizen, the 8th is debatable. The 9th and 10th haven't existed for 50 years.

If it was at all advantageous for Obama to put soldiers in my bedroom, the 3rd would be gone.

[Gargantua]

Something tells me it's gonna take more than hoping that these dictatotrial, fascist, would-be tyrants-in-waiting have a heart-changing epiphany. We may just have to neutralize them all at the "voting booth"... (aka "...on a rooftop with a .50...").

They'll never agree to just go peacefully. We may need an ELE here, natural or otherwise. LOL!!!

("ELE" = "Extinction Level Event")

;^\

[The Sons of Liberty]

When people, like those in congress and the 0bama regime, threaten to take away my GOD given rights, then I’m inclined to want to deprive THEM!

[seekthetruth]

Ping to TN Freepers here!
Please spread this info to your friends and family who might be able to be there in Manchester! Wish I could be there, but just to far from Ft. Lauderdale. With you in spirit.

http://www.jihadwatch.org/2013/06/be-there-afdi-free-speech-rally-protesting-doj-attempt-to-criminalize-criticism-of-islam——tomorrow.html

[ThunderSleeps]

My position is that every single one of our rights is under attack at all times. The only variation is to what degree. Think about it for a minute. The government is (has become) all about power and control. The founding fathers knew this. Government is a negative function - preventing you from doing things.

If the government would never infringe upon our rights and we could count on the men and women running government to always look out for us ... then why did the founding fathers feel the need for the Bill of Rights? Why would we have to expressly forbid the government from infringing upon these rights?

Because everyone who thinks about it for more than 30 seconds realizes they would if they could. They want to, some in government desperately, fervently hope to be able to stomp on some or all of them, but they can't blatantly do so because of the BoR. But the government - those in power and control for now - are always trying to expand their power and control. Our rights are under continual attack in ways big and small. They may have the best of intentions (or not), but in reality we are best served long term and as a whole by freedom and liberty. Not more government interference and control.

[privatedrive]

The only amendment they believe in is the Fifth.

[Bon mots]

---

[Sam Gamgee]

Welcome to Canada. We already have Human Rights Commissions that criminalize criticism of Islam. (But are silent about Islamic hate towards Christians or Jews)