Posted on 04/08/2013 12:22:24 PM PDT by butterdezillion
Summary: When Loretta Fuddy took over, after Palafox’s forced resignation, she had a new BC created for Obama at the request of law enforcement using Stig Waidelich’s BC#.
In order to hide that Obama’s BC# was illegally stolen from Waidelich, she altered at least 3 other BC#’s and fed them to the public via a stunt orchestrated with CNN and Stig and Monica Waidelich, a complicit Johanna Ah Nee, and a death certificate forgery - to try to hide how the BC’s were numbered.
After first conspiring with the AG’s office and Michael Issikof to lay a foundation of lies about what she can lawfully do, she violated the Administrative Rules and at least 3 statutes by instituting an illegal “policy” to keep people from being able to get photocopies/scans of original birth certificates, and at the same time forged and posted a 2001 memo to make it look like the policy had been in effect for a long time – to match the inaccurate statements given by Bob Bauer at the press gaggle. She illegally instituted that policy (by posting the forged memo) on the very day that Obama released his forged long-form image.
But she didn’t get away with it because others at the HDOH followed in the footsteps of the fired Neal Palafox, resisting the lawless deeds they were ordered to do, The clues they left are how we can know what really happened. The next article will be about one very prominent man at the HDOH and how he resisted.
(Excerpt) Read more at butterdezillion.wordpress.com ...
“Unless the Lord builds the house, they who labor, labor in vain. “
Prayers are critical. Thank you for praying for me.
We all need to keep Mesta Machine in our prayers as well - and pitch in on her dire medical needs if possible. We really do need each other - all of us - like different parts of a single body, working together, because that’s really what we are.
Thanks, Charlie. Just a quick question on the “intricate” part: Is it too intricate to make sense to a normal person? Is there a way I can make it clearer?
Thanks for any input you can give - and those who have given me constructive advice in the past can tell you that I do receive it gladly. (Well, usually.... lol)
So is naturalization a court procedure, an immigration procedure, or both? I don’t know much about this and would love to be educated on it. What do you know about how this works (if you don’t mind sharing)?
Like I said before, I couldn’t do it without the people who have quietly helped me find the information I needed. I hope they know how thankful I am for them. =)
Holdonnow is Mark Levin.
http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/by:holdonnow/index?brevity=full;tab=comments
Do I understand you to say the MCCP will not officially look at your research?
The CCP knows about my research, but unless they want to charge Fuddy (for instance) with crimes against Arizonans, the corruption and crimes at the HDOH are sort of beyond the scope of their investigation, which is about forgery and fraud. The crimes at the HDOH, HI AG’s office, etc have been to try to make it seem like there is no reason to investigate the forgery and fraud that the CCP is investigating. If the CCP can find somebody who is able to get an independent federal investigation, the fraud and forgery will be exposed, as will the crimes in Hawaii and elsewhere. So I believe the approach of the CCP is to provide overwhelming evidence of the forgery and fraud so that somebody will investigate.
What I’m doing sort of piggy-backs with that, because if these conservative “VIP’s” can see the systematic disinformation and fabrications that have taken place over an extended period of time, they will not be so quick to say that this could never happen because it would require such a big conspiracy. The evidence speaks for itself, when it’s all lined up in a row.
So the goal of both the CCP and myself is to get an independent federal investigation which can subpoena the records and settle this issue once and for all - the microfilms, paper records, scans, computer transaction logs, depositions, phone logs, etc. That’s what it would take to finally determine for sure exactly what happened. That’s the only way you or I will be convinced, and it’s the only way the general public will even realize there is a serious question.
Your arguments are perfectly clear. Some of us just have to study them longer. Thanks for all you do.
“So the goal of both the CCP and myself is to get an independent federal investigation which can subpoena the records and settle this issue once and for all - the microfilms, paper records, scans, computer transaction logs, depositions, phone logs, etc.”
Zullo and Gallups made reference to having contacted multiple state AGs. Barry’s MSM protection squad could crush a single state AG with charges of racism and birtherism, but if multiple AGs come out and stand together, particularly if at least one AG is not from “The Old South” the issue could get traction and get the attention of congress or at least the congressional delegations of the states whose AGs come forward.
Interesting on the financial disclosure. She managed to pay her debt down 78,000 dollars and also purchase a, what they call an apartment, for apparently 500,000 cash. Not bad for someone on a 100,000 dollars salary.
BTW if you go to Google maps and use the address listed 1629 Waikahalulu Ln a211, Honolulu, Hi 96817, there is a great picture of the house. In case ya’ll are interested...
As far as the apartment. Maybe didn’t pay 500,000. Could be just what it is worth? Coulda paid less, I guess. But still, no mortgage on it.
If the amounts reported in the lower attached page of that document contain several entries that are merely duplicates of the ones above, then she took in about $18,000 in moneys she chose to disclose as gifts.
On the other hand if the amounts in the attached page are intentionally disguised as duplicates, but are, in fact, second halves of the entries above, so that no single entry looks very large, then she brought in over $25K. (this interpretation, I admit is a stretch, but one of the amounts is off by a single dollar.)
You are anythig but clueless. None of us know it all.
WHen many of us say “Mark” we are referring to Levin. We have a Levin thread and he’s very popular here.
I did Freepmail him. But the guy is so busy its doubtful he will get to.But but you never know.
Continental U.S.: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1401
Alaska: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1404
Hawaii: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1405
The 500,000 ?
Maybe Antique road show thingy, Elvis plate purchased for 2 dollars at garage sale is now worth 500,000.
Happens all the time. :)
“The 500,000 ?
Maybe Antique road show thingy, Elvis plate
purchased for 2 dollars at garage sale is now worth 500,00”
Cattle Futures? I hear there are tremendous returns in cattle futures....
VERY INTERESTING ..... many thanks for finding this, Rides3!
CCPS, lucy, ray, seize: pinging all y’all to this post!
To: butterdezillion
Why would Obama et al forge a birth certificate from Hawaii? Quite simple. Alaska and Hawaii are the only two states that do not have the “subject to the jurisdiction” requirement for birthright citizenship.
Continental U.S.: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1401 Alaska: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1404 Hawaii: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1405
54 posted on Tue Apr 09 2013 14:42:50 GMT-0500 (CDT) by Rides3 [ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies | Report Abuse]
Very interesting indeed.
“Alaska and Hawaii are the only two states that do not have the “subject to the jurisdiction” requirement for birthright citizenship.”
I do not see any support for this contention at the Cornell links.
“Subject to the jurisdiction” is in the 14th Amendment and I see no exception for Alaska and HI other than for certain Indians and natives. Those exceptions went away in 1900 in HI and in 1924 in AK. So there is no relation to Barry’s 1961 birth alleged to have been in HI.
Given all of the contemporaneous 1961 cross-corroborated documentation pointing to Hawaii as the residence of Stanley Ann in 1961 up to at least Feb.2, that seems to me to be why the birth was registered there (wherever it actually took place).
Seize, thanks for clarifying!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.