Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What’s Behind Eastwood’s Super Bowl Ad?
National Legal & Policy Center ^ | February 6, 2012 | Mark Modica

Posted on 02/07/2012 9:57:32 AM PST by jazusamo

It is mostly unanimous that Clint Eastwood's Super Bowl ad appearance was a stirring and emotional tribute to America and Detroit. The ad was heartfelt, despite the fact that bailed out Italian-owned auto company, Chrysler, paid for it. Unless NBC offered some significant discounts to their ad rates, the ad cost Chrysler about $14 million. Considering the political nature of the ad and the fact that Chrysler vehicles were not touted in the ad, I must ask the cynical question; what's in it for Italian-owned Chrysler?

Chrysler CEO, Sergio Marchionne, is a pretty smart guy. I don't think he would cavalierly spend $14 million just to pay tribute to America and Detroit. An article in Businessweek touches on one possible ulterior motive when it states, "Chrysler continues to seek low-interest loans from the U.S. Energy Department to develop and produce fuel-efficient cars. The company sought $3.5 billion in such loans last year, and that amount has been reduced, Marchionne said. 'I'm not ready to give up,' Marchionne told reporters Feb. 4 at the National Automobile Dealers Association convention in Las Vegas. 'The department has not indicated an unwillingness to lend.'"

Well, I'm guessing that "the department's unwillingness to lend" has just been reduced further as Chrysler's ad serves as a campaign boost to President Obama. The Administration seemed pleased as they continued with their campaign to run on the perceived success at Chrysler and GM; as noted in the piece, "...the president's lieutenants praised the ad on Twitter." And, "'Saving the America Auto Industry: Something Eminem and Clint Eastwood can agree on,' Dan Pfeiffer, the White House communications director, said in a post on Twitter."

There is a dangerous precedent in having a US President campaigning on the success of an industry that the same Administration has an investment stake in (as in taxpayers' stake in General Motors) that continually raises the question of conflicts of interest. When else has a company receiving billions of taxpayer dollars like GM, owned partially by the government, run an ad disparaging an American company, like non-bailed out Ford, as happened in another Super Bowl ad?

As long as President Obama refuses to exit the taxpayers' ownership stake in GM while he continues campaigning on a platform of their success, there will be those of us who are suspicious of the actions involving both the company and our government. I find it hard to believe that many others are not questioning the ethical issues of having our President have such a vested interest in the auto sector while government agencies, like NHTSA, are responsible for overseeing the industry. And as far as Chrysler and Marchionne are concerned, let's see just how much influence the Eastwood ad bought them when the Energy Dept., or any other federal division, decides to dole out more taxpayer cash as payback for the campaign help.

Mark Modica is an NLPC Associate Fellow.



TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: chrysler; clinteastwood; doe; lowinterestloans; nlpc; obama; obamasuperbowlads; paytoplay; superbowlads; superbowlcommercials
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last
"Chrysler continues to seek low-interest loans from the U.S. Energy Department to develop and produce fuel-efficient cars. The company sought $3.5 billion in such loans last year,

Sounds like a good possibility, especially with Obama running things.

1 posted on 02/07/2012 9:57:44 AM PST by jazusamo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All

Working link:

http://nlpc.org/stories/2012/02/06/what%E2%80%99s-really-behind-eastwood%E2%80%99s-super-bowl-halftime-ad


2 posted on 02/07/2012 9:58:59 AM PST by jazusamo (Character assassination is just another form of voter fraud: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

We have the original Chrysler bailout back in 1977 to blame, that’s when it became expected that Government would step in and save companies that were “Too big to fail.”


3 posted on 02/07/2012 9:59:03 AM PST by dfwgator (Don't wake up in a roadside ditch. Get rid of Romney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

American motors comes to mind.


4 posted on 02/07/2012 10:01:03 AM PST by SkyDancer ("Never Have Regrets Because At The Time It Was Exactly What You Wanted")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Good commercial and great message!


5 posted on 02/07/2012 10:01:39 AM PST by Moleman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

That was Clint Eastwoods jump the shark moment for me
And I had been a life long fan


6 posted on 02/07/2012 10:05:11 AM PST by al baby (Hi Mom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moleman
Good commercial and great message!

Screw that! It was taxpayer financed commie f'ing propoganda!

7 posted on 02/07/2012 10:05:36 AM PST by pgkdan (Rick Santorum 2012. Conservative's last, best chance!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Please bump the Freepathon or click above and donate or become a monthly donor!

8 posted on 02/07/2012 10:06:40 AM PST by jazusamo (Character assassination is just another form of voter fraud: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moleman
To me, the message is that Obama is halfway through his eight years, and Clint is asking us to support the president.

I think this was tantamount to a taxpayer funded campaign commercial for Obama. I didn't like the message.

9 posted on 02/07/2012 10:07:01 AM PST by ClearCase_guy (I am pro-Jesus, anti-abortion, pro-limited government, anti-GOP.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

Gov’t bailouts date back to the Washington administration.


10 posted on 02/07/2012 10:07:59 AM PST by joesbucks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

They screwed their investors. I would not touch a Chrysler. And since 1980 I’ve owned:
1980 Dodge D50 pickup
84 Plymouth Reliant Station Wagon
87 Plymouth Reliant
88 Dodge Omni
1995 Lebaron convertible
2001 Chrysler 300m

I’m driving the 300 into the ground right now on my 100 mile commute. Love the car, even at 160,000 miles it is like new, except it could use shocks, but I’m done with Chrysler and GM, for obvious reasons.

They lost a lifelong customer - for good.

I like the new Fords and am considering a Fusion to replace the 300M when the wheels fall off.


11 posted on 02/07/2012 10:10:26 AM PST by cuban leaf (Were doomed! Details at eleven.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joesbucks

Not on that grand of a scale.


12 posted on 02/07/2012 10:10:49 AM PST by dfwgator (Don't wake up in a roadside ditch. Get rid of Romney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: al baby

I’m hopin it was just Oltimer’s...


13 posted on 02/07/2012 10:11:12 AM PST by rockrr (Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: al baby
"That was Clint Eastwoods jump the shark moment for me...And I had been a life long fan"

I know exactly how you feel. Since I was a little kid I was a huge Eastwood fan and was proud of the fact that my birthday was wedged neatly between GK Chesterton and Clint Eastwood.

I guess I can still be proud of Chesterton...

14 posted on 02/07/2012 10:15:10 AM PST by Joe 6-pack (Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Moleman

What was the great message, Moleman??


15 posted on 02/07/2012 10:17:06 AM PST by Ann Archy ( ABORTION...the HUMAN Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
"What’s Behind Eastwood’s Super Bowl Ad?"

0bama.

16 posted on 02/07/2012 10:17:18 AM PST by YHAOS (you betcha!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: al baby

Ditto. Maybe he needs the money


17 posted on 02/07/2012 10:20:09 AM PST by SMARTY ("The man who has no inner-life is a slave to his surroundings. "Henri Frederic Amiel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Eastwood is just another Hollywierdo and former mayor of leftist California town Carmel.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Main article: Clint Eastwood

Actor and director Clint Eastwood has long shown an interest in politics. He was elected mayor in April 1986 of Carmel-by-the-Sea, California and in 2001, he was appointed to the California State Park and Recreation Commission by Governor Gray Davis.[1]

At times, he has supported Democrats in California, such as the liberal and environmentally concerned Representative Sam Farr in 2002. Eastwood contributed $1,000 to Farr’s successful re-election campaign that year and on May 23, 2003, he hosted a $5,000-per-ticket fundraiser for California’s Democratic governor, Gray Davis.[6] Later that year, Eastwood offered to film a commercial in support of the embattled governor,[7] and in 2001, the star visited Davis’ office to support an alternative energy bill written by another Democrat, California State Assemblyman Fred Keeley.

Clint Eastwood As Tokyo Rose? Director Made Up Scenes in ‘Iwo Jima’ Documentary
World Net Daily.com ^ | 12/22/06 | staff report

Posted on Friday, December 22, 2006 9:35:47 AM by meg88

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1757310/posts


18 posted on 02/07/2012 10:32:47 AM PST by KeyLargo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

Doesn’t matter. Precedent was set. And by the administration of a founding father.


19 posted on 02/07/2012 10:37:52 AM PST by joesbucks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: al baby

Maybe Clint owed them something from his spaghetti western days. Kind of a mob thing. /s


20 posted on 02/07/2012 10:40:48 AM PST by jimmango
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson