Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama Admin informs Beechcraft of aircraft loss in favor of Brazilian firm with ties to Iran
Washington Examiner ^ | Nov 21, 2011 | Jeff Head

Posted on 11/21/2011 1:38:46 PM PST by Jeff Head

The Obama Administration has notified Hawker Beechcraft Corp. that its Beechcraft AT-6 has been excluded from competition to build a light attack aircraft, a contract worth nearly $1 billion, the company said.

The company had hoped to its AT-6, an armed version of its T-6 trainer, would be chosen for the Light Air Support Counter Insurgency aircraft for the Afghanistan National Army Corps. The chosen aircraft also would be used as a light attack armed reconnaissance aircraft for the U.S. Air Force.

The piston planes are designed for counterinsurgency, close air support, armed overwatch and homeland security, The Wichita Eagle reported (http://bit.ly/ud7FDM).

Hawker Beechcraft officials said in a news release that they were "confounded and troubled" by the Air Force's decision. The company said it is asking the Air Force for an explanation and will explore all options.

The decision appears to favor the Super Tucano built by Brazil's Embraer for the initial contract to supply 35 with the potential for 55 aircraft worth up to $950?million, which does not include foreign sales, the Eagle reported.

Brazil's Embraer aircraft company build's milit ary aircraft for Iran.

The Beechcraft T-6 production line employs a total of 1400 people in 20 states.


Hawker Beechcraft's AT-6


Brazil Embraer's Super Tucano


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: afghanmilitary; beechcraft; enablingenemies; enemywithin; iran; islam; jobkiller; nobama; obamafraud; treason
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last
To: Jeff Head

Obama can’t buy anything without money being appropriated by congress. Seems like I remember the republicans running on the promise that since they control the purse strings....mmmm. Guess they forgot.


41 posted on 11/21/2011 2:37:49 PM PST by Terry Mross (I'll only vote for a second party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rdcbn

The AT-6 represents a spiral development of the T-6 which Beechcraft has already built over 600 of. There’s a huge logistics support apparatus already in place, and the Air Force’s T-6 and the US Navy’s T-6B means that getting people up to speed on this aircraft will be straight forward.

In addition, as opposed to license kits shipped here for assembly from Brazil (who has, IMHO, uncomfortable ties to iran) the development, manufacture, and support pipeline are all under our control here in the US.

I think this is an award that Beechcraft should protest and may be able to get turned around.


42 posted on 11/21/2011 2:38:58 PM PST by Jeff Head (Liberty is not free. Never has been, never will be. (www.dragonsfuryseries.com))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: NavyCaptain

Pleaaasssseeee, Sir!

There, 40 years ago I was on ComServGru3 staff in Sasebo with an Admiral across the hall so I still know how to say sir.

But, come on, our generals and admirals today, with few exceptions, put their own personal career first! The last general I know to butt heads with political appointees or the Prez was McArthur and possibly McCrystal although I don’t have enough facts to come to that conclusion on him. Yeah, I know they both got fired. But, that’s my point! And, let’s not forget, god bless him, Colonel Lakin. Like our civilian politicians, our military, at the very top, are not, for the most part, living up to their oath to protect and defend the constitution or even just do what is right!

Finally, the recently departed Mullen just makes me ill with all that he has caved on. My son had 3 years at MMA in Harlingen and 4 years at Texas A & M in the Corp and we were both so sickened by our country’s leadership that he decided, and I supported, him passing on military service and going straight into civilian work. And, don’t get me started on ROE’s................for god sake!


43 posted on 11/21/2011 2:43:37 PM PST by Cen-Tejas (it's the debt bomb stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: rdcbn
On another thread here the Request For Proposal definitely stated the aircraft had to be current of the shelf and not in development.

The Hawker Beechcraft is still in development. It's a shame as I have always had an affection for Beechcraft as the Twin Beech was the first multi engine aircraft in which I was rated.

44 posted on 11/21/2011 2:53:50 PM PST by OldMissileer (Atlas, Titan, Minuteman, PK. Winners of the Cold War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head


45 posted on 11/21/2011 2:54:01 PM PST by Chode (American Hedonist - *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head

Where did you read this? Last I heard, the Jacksonville factory would be a full fledged production facility with 70% of all parts made in the US, not just a knockdown kit assembly plant.


46 posted on 11/21/2011 3:04:52 PM PST by JerseyanExile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head
I think this is an award that Beechcraft should protest and may be able to get turned around.

Hawker Beechcraft certainly greased the most palms in Congress and made sure manufacturing was scattered across multiple states, but in this instance, the Super Tucano was an off-the-shelf system. It's a shame that the T-6s sold to Iraq a few years back weren't AT-6s, because that would have put Hawker Beechcraft in a much better position.

I'm surprised Hawker didn't get it, not because of the Super Tucano being available and already deployed, but because Hawker certainly greased the right palms.
47 posted on 11/21/2011 3:09:05 PM PST by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head
I think this is an award that Beechcraft should protest and may be able to get turned around.

They could "Occupy Something". That's what the cool kids who want jobs provided do these days.

48 posted on 11/21/2011 3:10:35 PM PST by Oztrich Boy (New gets old. Steampunk is always cool)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head

“BACKGROUND AND REQUIREMENTS: LAS aircraft must be a non-developmental item (NDI) that is production-ready. No development or testing funds are available. ” Introduction of LAS Solicitation FA8615-10-R-6088”

The Beech press release states that it has spent 100 million to develop the craft - it is not done yet.

Embraer estimated that it spent under $50,000 to fly the aircraft to the test site, fly the test missions and then return to Brazil.

Since RFP paper work is constant among competitors the accurate ratio of $100 Million to $50,000 says it all. Additionally, the $100 mil was US taxpayer dollars, and the $50,000 was at the Super Tucano’s teams risk funding.


49 posted on 11/21/2011 3:19:49 PM PST by frithguild (Restricting access to capital - Liberalism: The sharpest tool of big business, banks, etc.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head

The A-29 Super Tucano will be proudly built in Jacksonville, Fla., with parts and services from more than 70 U.S. companies in 21 states.

This contract will immediately support the creation of at least 50 new jobs on the final assembly line in Jacksonville, and will help support at least 1,200 more jobs across America. Some 60 U.S. companies will supply components that will go into the Super T or services related to the LAS contract.

Sierra Nevada Corporation (SNC), the contract lead, currently employs more than 2,100 people at 29 locations in 15 states. Embraer North America has been in the United States for over 30 years, and employs 800 people in Florida; Arizona; Tennessee; Minnesota; and Connecticut. The company recently opened a new executive jet production facility in Melbourne that is creating 200 new jobs. The Jacksonville facility will augment this ongoing U.S. production.

Embraer is the world’s third-largest aircraft manufacturer and sources a majority of its component parts – across all business lines – from the United States. More than 7,000 U.S. jobs are supported as a result of Embraer’s component purchases

http://builtforthemission.com/american-made.php


50 posted on 11/21/2011 3:23:36 PM PST by frithguild (Restricting access to capital - Liberalism: The sharpest tool of big business, banks, etc.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head

Slightly more capable than a junkers Stuka, much less capable that a P-47 Thunderbolt or a Corsair. Outclassed by a Skyraider,, really embarrassed by a digital turboprop Skyraider.
Rendered a joke by a Warthog.


51 posted on 11/21/2011 3:25:37 PM PST by DesertRhino (I was standing with a rifle, waiting for soviet paratroopers, but communists just ran for office)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JerseyanExile

I saw where they said they would assemle the aircraft in Jacksonville.

Now I am reading where something like 60 US companies would provide parts to that assembly line.

That’s fine if those parts all stay in the US.

My principle concern howerver is the fact that you have Brazil providing military aircraft (in fact 40 of the older Tucano’s) to Iran, and more recently cozing up to Ian and helping them with their nuclear program and dealings with Turkey.

To have the aircraft that our allies will use to fight with designed and provided to the US by a country that is working with one of the principle potential enemies of those allies, IRan, does not make any sense.

I have also heard that there is talk of a potential tie between the award of this contract and the Brazilians looking harder at the F/A-18E/F Super Hornet for their new FX-2 fighter. Now that is starting to sound like the political leverage the Brazilians are wielding.

Just the same, my concerns over the use of aircraft by our allies from a source growing close to the very enemies thay may have to face is not a good thing.


52 posted on 11/21/2011 3:44:13 PM PST by Jeff Head (Liberty is not free. Never has been, never will be. (www.dragonsfuryseries.com))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: frithguild

Why do you say that the money Beech invested is taxpayer money? Beech is not owned or operated by the Government. They invest in deals in the hopes of recouping the investment through production.

Anyhow, it will be interesting to see how this goes. lots of politics (as usual) on both sides of the coin.


53 posted on 11/21/2011 3:46:40 PM PST by Jeff Head (Liberty is not free. Never has been, never will be. (www.dragonsfuryseries.com))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: JerseyanExile

Exactamundo. Most people don’t understand that procured items will be built in the US.

The service needs it now, buy who makes it now.

Thanks for clarifying.


54 posted on 11/21/2011 4:05:07 PM PST by onona (FR is continuing education)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Right you are. Soros has a major shareholding in Harbin-Embraer, the Chinese subsidiary of Embraer.


55 posted on 11/21/2011 4:35:54 PM PST by Melchior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Melchior
Right you are. Soros has a major shareholding in Harbin-Embraer, the Chinese subsidiary of Embraer.

Winning!

; ^ ]

56 posted on 11/21/2011 4:39:15 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum ("The very idea of a community organizer is to stir up a mob for some political purpose." Ann Coulter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: frithguild
I heard Hawker/Beechcraft had spent over 150 million$ on developing their entry in the competition for what was clearly intended to be an off the shelf aircraft. While that may seem incredibly stupid, they won the (JPATS)Joint Primary Aircraft Training System contract for a twin engined jet trainer with this same Swiss designed single engined turboprop much to the detriment of Cessna which had spent a lot of money developing an US designed aircraft that actually met the program requirements. At that time Beechcraft was owned by Raytheon and must have had more pull with the levers of power controlling defense spending. The company is reported to be spectacularly poorly managed by myself and by many I know who currently work there. I've heard it said that the company is bleeding red ink badly and only has a few months of burn left. This waste of 150 Million$ will not help inspire further investor confidence.

Who knew that my mortgage company was invested in our foreign competition? I'll have to mention it to them if I default on our house. Tit for tat.

I was told that when a journalist refuses to let anybody in industry review their writing before they publish it, that stupid errors like calling a turbine engine a recip' is evidence of their great journalistic integrity. But to me it still comes across as stupid arrogance and the whole idea of journalistic integrity is laughable.

57 posted on 11/21/2011 5:22:49 PM PST by ME-262 (We need Term Limits for the federal house and senate. We need new Bums up there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Venturer

“Which looks a lot like a P-51 Mustang”

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piper_PA-48_Enforcer


58 posted on 11/21/2011 5:31:34 PM PST by MCF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head
My principle concern howerver is the fact that you have Brazil providing military aircraft (in fact 40 of the older Tucano’s) to Iran, and more recently cozing up to Ian and helping them with their nuclear program and dealings with Turkey.

While it makes me uneasy, US companies are supplying aircraft much more advanced than this to other countries that will probably become target practice for our pilots or drones in the future.

We're selling/giving F-16s to Iraq. Think that won't come back to haunt us?

Boeing and other US companies are working with China's aviation industry on state-of-the-art systems, and while it's non-military, it will certainly strengthen China's aviation industry, both civilian and military. Boeing's CEO even admitted that Chian's aviation industry will eventually compete head-to-head with companies like Boeing for future airliners, possibly doing grave damage to our economy, but he still signed off on Boeing working with them.

There are many other issues that are far bigger than this. It makes me sick to hear some of the stories about dealings between China and US companies - China has a long-term approach and they are preparing for the day when they can put companies like Boeing out of business.
59 posted on 11/21/2011 5:33:31 PM PST by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head

More money to Brazil. First he ogles a Brazilian teen, then he helps Soros and Brazillian Oil, now defense contracts. Does he actually know what country he is supposed to work for?


60 posted on 11/21/2011 5:35:14 PM PST by King Moonracer (Bad lighting and cheap fabric, that's how you sell clothing.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson