Posted on 08/28/2011 8:17:34 AM PDT by techno
There is a familiar aphorism among Palinistas and right-wing blogs that Sarah Palin plays chess while everyone else plays checkers. I agree.
What I would like to do is illustrate how Sarah Palin is playing chess so deftly, what moves she plans to make once she enters the presidential race (the political lay of the land) and at the same time explain the deficiencies in the chess game prowess and execution of Mitt Romney and how these deficiencies may lead to his eventual downfall in the GOP primaries.
In interest of full disclosure I am one of the worst chess players in the world. I have down all the basic moves and I know the #1 goal of the game is to prevent your king from being captured in a move called checkmate (and thus lose the game) and understand the basic strategies of the game, but simply I cannot execute.
I am like the duffer who has a basic understanding of how a professional golfer can hit a ball over 300 yards in the center of the fairway but cannot myself demonstrate the necessary hand-eye coordination, shift of weight movements, striking power, and the proper swing plane so that I can consistently hit the golf ball in the middle of the golf club face to achieve that feat.
Imho, Sarah Palin is like the finely-tuned golfer who consistently strikes the golf ball in the middle of the golf club face while Mitt Romney is a golfer whose mechanics are suspect at times and often finds his golf ball in the rough, bunker or hazard and simply beats himself due to a failure to execute the appropriate golf shot under pressure or in crucial or pivotal situations or he can also be compared to a golfer who always lays up on par 5 holes rather than going for the green in two.
But back to chess. Sarah Palin is like a grandmaster chess player who knows all the moves and when to employ them in the game to her full advantage, while Mitt Romney is more like me--he plays with a lackluster temperament and basically knows what he wants to accomplish throughout the game but simply can't pull it off.
With that in mind here are ten chess moves, strategies or scenarios that I would like to discuss in the context of Sarah Palin and Mitt Romney to illustrate why the latter may not be able to get back his front runner status ever.
1) In chess there are two basic approaches to play generally: To go on the attack for the most part to strike early vs. to play defense in hope of counterattacking successfully and to win a game of attrition.
Sarah Palin is a predator who stalks her prey, while Mitt Romney is like a big-game hunter on safari in Africa awaiting his prey to enter his domain of choice at the time. As Palin has not entered the "game" yet, I will deal strictly with Romney from hereon for the most part.
How do I know this is Romney's chess or political strategy or his modus operandi?
a)It is how I habitually play chess. It takes one to know one.
b)His record of NOT engaging the enemy or opponent in an aggressively political manner. Now this may be as a result of Romney's personal belief system, it could be a rational political strategy on his part (or that of his advisers) or it could be that Romney is NOT capable of "playing the agggressor" or acting the part but regardless there is no mistaking his predominant defensive posture when he is playing the "political" game.
And I can tell you in the game of chess that is usually a losing strategy. The opponent dictates how you will play the game and basically "calls the shots". You become so concerned about protecting your king (in political terms losing the GOP nomination) that you eventually succumb to the mounting attacks over the duration of the game by losing valuable chess pieces (queen, rook, knight, bishop) and end up simply being completely surrounded or enveloped after your resources (the ability to mount an effective counteroffensive) have been severely diminished or depleted. This is where I think Romney is headed if he is not in the early stages of the process already.
2) Chess starts off as a game where several pawns are moved ahead on the board supposedly to allow one an opportunity to get the lay of the land, to gain the early upper hand on the opponent and to eventually allow the more valuable chess pieces to "seize the day" and to infiltrate the defenses of the opponent in order to probe for vulnerabilities and in order to weaken your counterpart's ability to defend his or her king.
But Romney looks at pawns differently imho. For him they are simply there to be used and sacrificed in the name of expediency capture for capture to prevent any self-sacrifice on his part and for facilitating the sacrifice or manipulation of others for his cause or to his advantage and to maintain his front runner status.
Romney has already sacrificed his pawns during the primary season leading up the Ames Straw poll but it appears he does NOT have any clue how to use his most valuable pieces now to put himself in a superior position or conversely make his opponent(s) more vulnerable. Instead he appears to favor a stand-pat strategy and this strategy did work fairly well s long as other opponents were not willing to become the aggressor "and take the game to Romney" in order to infiltrate his defenses. Rick Perry has changed that equation and Palin will take it to even a higher level of assertiveness once she enters the race.
3)The pincer movement in chess usually involves the knight penetrating the enemy defenses and putting the enemy king in check while putting another valuable piece (commonly the rook) in jeopardy of also being captured while not being subject to capture yourself. The opponent is forced to move his king out of harm's way because the knight is the one piece that cannot be stymied by moving another piece in to block its movement as it moves two squares straight and one square to either side. It is the piece I have the most trouble defending against because I don't have the analytical mind to anticipate the move beforehand to take my king out of jeopardy before the move can be made. By definition a pincer movement catches the opponent completely off guard or by surprise and by then it is too late to respond. The enemy in chess is forced to defend his king thus surrendering his rook or other valuable piece in the process. There is no other option.
I believe Mitt Romney has the same problem, Yes, he has advisers to counsel him about these kinds of political situations but it one thing to be told about the possibility of a pincer movement but it is entirely another matter for Romney to be capable of enough to anticipate an event of this magnitude to prevent the capture of a valuable chess piece. Consulting with his advisers ipso facto is too late. And by Perry now gaining superiority over Romney among seniors and college grads, Mitt is forced figuratively to move his king (seniors)but in so doing he loses a valuable demographic constituency, college grads, which severely weakens his ability to compete as the capture of an opponent's rook is a devastating blow to the opponent in the game of chess.
4)The rook moves in a straight line in either direction on the board and is considered the powerful piece other than the queen. Imho, this is the one piece that Mitt Romney is figuratively most comfortable with. Romney prefers to move in a straight line when it comes to political strategy and relies on linear thinking to convince GOP primary voters to support him. Unfortunately for Romney, the GOP primary voters may be on the lookout in this election cycle for someone who possesses non-linear thinking or one who employs asymmetrical warfare and is willing to employ a comprehensive political general election strategy that is less predictable and more unconventional to match and compete with the Alinsky tactics of the Left.
5)The bishop is a piece that moves diagonally but must remain confined to either the black square or white square it originated from during the duration of the game. The bishop is really symbolic of Romney's inability or lack of propensity to move outside his "ideological box" and to be actually or by perception seen as someone who lacks the ability to branch out beyond his self-regulated boundaries that were laid out by himself when he commenced the campaign or to consider other choices or alternatives on how to proceed on the fly.
6) The queen is the most valuable piece in the game of chess in terms of winning the game, being so valuable that if you lose your queen without your opponent losing his in an immediate exchange it means that there is a high probability you will lose the game or see the futility of your position and be forced to resign (in political terms leave the campaign).
The queen can be compared to Mitt Romney's ability to fundraise and to tap into his private fortune if he needs to finance his campaign and the cachet he brings with him as "the next-in-line candidate". In terms of the game of chess, Romney will do anything to prevent his Queen from being captured and will not agree to trade his queen for the opponent's queen. He knows if he is on a par with the other candidates in fundraising and/or cachet he doesn't have the requisite personal or political assets to win the nomination. His entire strategy imho, is based on his belief most of his opponents will start off their campaigns without a queen or if they do eventually develop one because of his "last man standing strategy" they will eventually be worn down (lack of fundraising ability as primaries drag on) and again simply be forced to resign from the chess match.
7)Unfortunately for Mitt Romney the game of chess can be won without one's opponent capturing the other's queen. The other way to win the game is to pick off the valuable and vulnerable chess pieces of one's opponent and weaken his or her overall defense and his or her ability to counter and save the pieces from capture. Imho, this is Sarah Palin's strategy to deal with Mitt Romney at present unless Rick Perry can administer the death blow to Romney within the next month which I think is highly unlikely: To weaken Romney over time by eroding his support and his ability to mount an effective counteroffensive despite Romney still in possession of his queen and then to eventually overwhelm Mitt with superior firepower and resources.
Of course Perry could do both Palin and himself a favor if he can capture Romney's queen before Palin enters the race if Romney's GOP establishment donors and major supporters abandon ship and cut off his fundraising lifeline for good.
8)Sarah Palin is a proponent of asymmetrical warfare and OODA (observe, orient, direct and act) and a genius in moving her valuable pieces around the chess in a lethal and scintillating combination of tactics and maneuvers depending on the configuration of the board and point in the game. In boxing terms she could considered a one-two punch or in baseball a triple threat.
With regards to Mitt Romney, he really s a one-trick pony whose strategy is entirely symmetrical and totally predictable which makes it much easier for Palin to attack Romney at his most vulnerable spots and to anticipate his future moves while on the prowl and not have to be concerned about Romney coming up with some new, funky strategy to penetrate her already well-fortified defense.
9)And Perry is now exploiting Romney's inability to mount any credible offense. In football terms Romney is even having trouble now getting first downs. Presently Perry appears to be taking steps to take advantage of Romney's lack of initiative by going on the attack now and apparently Romney has chosen not to respond but to sit tight. Perhaps the real answer is he either doesn't have an effective response ready to go or he might be consulting with his team now about where he goes from here.
At the present time Romney should take extra precautions to ensure the safety of his queen. He has suddenly become very vulnerable.
10)And finally Palin has NOT even yet entered "the chess tournament" and thus still possesses her full complement of pawns and valuable pieces to protect her from the attacks, counterattacks, and counteroffensives of her enemies. Yes, both Perry and Romney possess active Queens who are NOT encumbered and at the same time have the freedom of the chess board and thus neither can probably be dispatched to the sidelines quickly but if anyone can win a lengthy war of attrition complemented by a highly sophisticated and imaginative "dominant queen strategy" to infiltrate an opponent's defensive positions in a stealth-like fashion and strike like a cobra it is Sarah Palin, the Queen of the Palinistas.
For Palinistas, this should be fascinating to watch as it unfolds.
Right,I am in Florida district 22 FRiend!!!!!!! This Gross Ignorance is a bit much,I suggest you look at the record:
Pigford Which is Reparations, YEP!!
Libya funding YEP
Debt Cap ,Trillions for Zippy, Yep
Zippy Care Defunding NAY ,
RINO West voting to continue to fund Obama’s school medical clinics,GET THIS ,which are collection areas for planned parenthood,Comment???
Does anyone know the laws involving political candidates and money? For example, if a person has not announced their candidacy and has not filed papers indicating an intent to seek the office of President can they divert to personal use funds raised as they travel around making speeches, personal appearances and icome derived from publishing books and articles?
Does anyone know the laws involving political candidates and money? For example, if a person has not announced their candidacy and has not filed papers indicating an intent to seek the office of President can they divert to personal use funds raised as they travel around making speeches, personal appearances and income derived from publishing books and articles?
Thank you for all of this info.. I hadn’t heard any of it before :/
Thank God for FR or I may have never found out about it..
Sir you are welcome,The gist of it is he was a TEA party candidate BUT we now know what he did,Personally ,I never thought he would let us down!
WHATTA freakin SNOOZE-FEST!
LOL.
All kidding aside, a very good read with some really apt and sharply-drawn similes. Thank you.
;-\
Interesting question. When that first line of (psychological) defense is breached when she announces, it will be interesting to see what positions they fall back to. In fact, I recently saw someone here post a hypothetical list of the entire sequence of retreat positions (my apologies to the original poster - I can't remember who it was or even what thread). Together with that and a few ideas of my own, I imagine it will be some combination of the following:
1) She’s too smart not to know that she'll be crushed by Perry anyway so jumping in the race and thus losing her post as really cool cheerleader will be her own fault for daring to run
2) Our best conservative hope in Perry was destroyed by those merciless, leftist Palinbots overexposing a few of his trivial weaknesses and it’s all her fault for daring to run
3) She'll spilt the conservative vote allowing Romney getting through, which will destroy the Republican brand for a generation and it will be all her fault for daring to run (a variation on #2 and basically the same as your "she's ruining it for all the others")
4) Ron Paul will come from behind and crush everybody (OK, I just threw that in for grins)
5) Sure she's got the GOP nomination but now we are guaranteed to lose in the general and the inevitable consequence of 4 more years of Obama will be all her fault for daring to run
6) The polls show her hopelessly behind Obama proving we were right that the end of the world would result if she ran so all the evil that follows will be all her fault for daring to run
7) Sure she devastated Obama in that last debate but a month is not enough time to overcome her deficit in the polls proving we were right that the end of the world would result if she ran so all the evil that follows will be all her fault for daring to run
8) The exit polls all show we were right that nominating Palin ruined our chances proving we were right that the end of the world would result if she ran so all the evil that follows will be all her fault for daring to run
9) The Soros-backed attorneys will keep the results of this very close election in doubt for months and the resulting instability and uncertainty is all Sarah's fault for daring to run
10) She'll never get to the inauguration ceremony and it will be all Bristol’s fault for dancing with the stars
11) She won't actually get sworn in and it will be all Piper’s fault because she shoved that reporter
12) Dang it, now what do I do?
To the last of which I would respond, “How about getting a real job?”
Please.... Chessie Checkers is how the Dems made her resign in Alaska. Can’t believe how so many can be so willfully blind!
“The ethics law I championed became their weapon of choice.”
Because of the unforseen availability inside the ethics law she rooted for and signed, she re-signed. Her lawyers shudda caught the garage-door loophole in the new law she “championed”; the Democrat lawyers certainly did. But she was Governor, her lawyer wasn’t. She helped push that law along and decided to sign it. She was in charge. She was leading. And where did she lead Alaska (and her own family) to? Into court, into an impossible snarl of insignificant-yet-incredibly-expensive Democrat pettiness. Sarah apparently trusted her Alaska opposition the way Carter trusted Soviet Premier Brezhnev in the late 70s, the same way she seemed to trust Gibson/Couric’s intentions on two separate occasions in 2008. And now you all want all of us to trust her (if she actually does announce candidacy).
http://www.zimbio.com/Molly+McCann/articles/j-Uy5esbQws/Survival+Sarah+Palin+Enemies+Running
I am lrarning to skip long winded essays such as this. Waste of time to read.
"Today, I will show you why Sarah Palin is a lot like coding, debugging, and deploying an ASP.NET website, particularly when one is using Microsoft Application Blocks such as Security and the SQL namespace."
"Today, I will show you why Sarah Palin is a lot like pulling guard, positioning, and submitting an opponent with an armbar, particularly when one is using takedowns followed by ground and pound."
"Today, I will show you why Sarah Palin is a lot like rubbing, prepping, and grilling a full rack of pork ribs grilled on the pit, particularly when one is using a Kansas City brown sugar rub and a molasses based BBQ sauce."
"Today, I will show you why Sarah Palin is a lot like mashing, distilling, and aging Tennessee Whiskey, particularly when one is a corn base and a sour mash across multiple stills to add consistency."
All well and good, but chess does have deep roots, both historically and analytically, in political/military game theory, so while some of the individual sub-analogies may be a bit strained, there's enough congruence that the chess analogy is likely to persist as part of the vocabulary of this discussion, particularly when Palin evinces superior strategic thinking and planning in a game theory context. She's a natural at this, and people need a way to talk about it. Chess is simply off-the-shelf handy for that purose. Not unlike a MS Application Block. :)
The law was passed and signed (in response to the Murkowski corruption) well before she ever imagined she would be involved in national politics. So your latest "blame the victim" meme utterly fails.
Unintended consequences - One of Sarah's achievements caused her resignation. Can't see how to explain it any simpler. Governor Sarah helped build and field the weapon her opponents easily, quickly, and cleverly used to run her out of office.
She’s only viewed as a bad national candidate because she was handled quite poorly by McCain’s handlers. As the one on top of the ticket it was his prerogative to run his campaign the way he wanted. Thus, we’ve never really seen a “Palin” campaign in a national race. You need to look to her running style in Alaska to understand how she runs a campaign. Anyone who can unseat a powerful sitting governor is someone with political savvy. Nothing is carved in stone and media created perceptions can change. Look at the media’s portrayal of Reagan vs. the opinion of the people. The same can be said of 0bama but in the opposite direction. If you’re basing your perception on her VP run with McCain then your perceptions are wrong.
Cindie
Oh yeah, it was all her fault! And Obama, Pete Rouse, Rahm Emmanuel, Kim Elton, Hollis French, the Alaska state legislature, and the Alaska anklebiters had NOTHING to do with it.
You PDS'ers don't realize how ludicrous your latest "blame the victim" meme sounds. "She quit" never gained any traction, and so this is your fallback talking point?
Laughable.
Get used to the smell of ozone. You'll be reeking of it shortly.
I will bet that you will eventually stop picking your nose and sticking the buggers on everyone’s screen.
And I further predict that you will eventually stop eating his buggers.
I didn’t realize that you were a shill for Rupert Murdoch.
>> “ Even those who question his every move still will not even consider Obama is a scam, a total fraud.” <<
.
You can easily say that about Romney, Huntsman, and Perry, but not about Palin nor Bachmann.
The three Metro-Boys are so much like Obama that they really do not see anything wrong with him, but Palin and to some extent Bachmann, have shown that they are cognizant of Obama’s goals, and Palin has advocated many steps toward repairing the damage.
Directing attention toward electing anyone but Palin is indicative of a bent similar to that of Obama.
“The ethics law I championed became their weapon of choice.”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.