Great question.
Click any donate link or go to
https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/
Please take this generous offer into consideration!
Posted on 07/24/2011 5:58:31 PM PDT by skimbell
When this episode in the American saga is written, historians will note that Barack Obama did not kill the Democratic Party; he was merely the murder weapon.
He represents the Democrats’ suicide cocktail of hubris and a tyrannical lust for power, the arrogance of thinking themselves above the law.
American politicians and journalists have degenerated so far that it is now possible for a President of the United States to present a clearly forged document on national television and no one blinks an eye.
We have an illegal President, a Congress that tolerates criminal acts, and an intentionally impotent judiciary...
(Excerpt) Read more at canadafreepress.com ...
I’ll be curious to see if Nazi Pelosi is willing to commit perjury again for Soetoro like she did last time. I’m thinking not so much in 2011.
So the article states tha the truth about the boob’s BC will soon come out. What does that mean? Surely he doesn’t think the media is going to put up with that as he states they’re complicit in this whole sham. Given the volume of information already around about the integrity of the documents shown to us “rubes” what could possibly be the true smoking gun? And would that information would be strong enough to pull the virtual keystone out of the Rat party?
Nancy Pelosi likely won’t be the Chairman of the 2012 Democratic National Convention. The current Chairman of the Democratic National Commitee, Tim Kaine, will nominate someone for chair of the convention sometime this year. Whomever that is will be responsible for signing those presidential nomination forms that go out to the states.
Perhaps our greatest abolitionist, judge and congressman John Bingham, who initiated, campaigned for, and authored (coauthor) the 14th Amendment addressed congress on several ocassions, clarifying the meaning of natural born citizenship, since his amendment would address and clarify who were citizens, as provided for in Article 1 Section 8:
I find no fault with the introductory clause [S 61 Bill], which is simply declaratory of what is written in the Constitution, that every human being born within the jurisdiction of the United States of parents not owing allegiance to any foreign sovereignty is, in the language of your Constitution itself, a natural born citizen….
Our greatest Chief Justice, a founder and framer, cited in The Venus, 12 US 253, from our nation's first law book, designated by the founder of our first law school at William and Mary,in 1779, Thomas Jefferson. The law book was the most cited legal reference between 1789 and 1821, Vattel’s Law of Nations. Marshall said:
“The citizens are the members of the civil society; bound to this society by certain duties, and subject to its authority, they equally participate in its advantages. The natives or indigenes are those born in the country of parents who are citizens. Society not being able to subsist and to perpetuate itself but by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights.”
Especially note Vattel's, and Aristotle's, and Cicero's acknowledgment that "children naturally follow the condition of their fathers..." Our justices, and British jurists included both parents in their statement of the natural law that children inherit their allegiance from "parents," and not just the father. Barack Jr. told us from whom his dreams came, and his comrades apparently shared that dream for a Marxist US.
The case which established the Vattel definition as precedent was Minor v. Happersett, a woman's suffrage case from 1874. In it the Marshall/Vattel definition was confirmed by the court, (thanks Leo Donofrio) making it incontrovertible law. The core of the decisions needed a constitutionally defined citizen, and the only such was found in Article II Section 1. Obama’s cohorts at Justia.com understood this, which is why his Harvard supporters edited the original case documents to eliminate references to Minor v. Happersett in October of 2008. Here are the words of Chief Justice Morrison Waite:
“The Constitution does not, in words, say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that.At common-law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners.”
Finally, every US Senator, along with Obama’s Harvard Law Constitutional Law Professor signed their concurrence with the following statement in the Senate Archives from the hearing led by Judiciary Committee Chairman Pat Leahy. Remember, every Senator who signed this to try to cloud John McCain's constitutional eligibility issues knew perfectly well that Barack Obama was born a British Subject, thus a naturalized US Citizen, because, among many reasons, Barack told us that himself:
“My assumption and my understanding is thatif you are born of American parents, you are naturally a natural-born American citizen,” Chertoff replied. “That is mine, too,” said Leahy.”
There is no doubt that Obama lacks constitutional eligibility, but he doesn't respect The Constitution and told us so, and neither do his comrades. The corruption is such that every US senator is complicit. An honest patriot, doctor and army officer, Dr. Terry Lakin, asked, as his oath required, and spent months in Leavenworth, demonstrating the corruption within the armed forces. An Army judge forbade the doctor the right to defend himself, modifying the army chain of command to do so.
Obama’s ineligibility must not be forgotten. We haven’t the power to enforce our laws with Obama’s corruption of the justice department, and given the reality that federal judges are all political appointees. We must first take back the centers of government power, and then every law passed, and every legislator who failed to have the courage to defend the constitution must be examined. Sadly, some who failed us are both likable and have otherwise solid conservative credentials. We must not be afraid of the Alinsky tactics “Ridicule is man's most potent weapon.”, and must know the Constitution in order to defend it.
Alice Travis Germond-Sec. DNC.
Culpable with Pelosi as per the Documents of Certification....Pelosi sent out two different ones per Little Stevie Dunham’s, Barry Soetoro’s eligibility.
Wishful thinking. The dems have a history of throwing people under the bus when their usefulness is over.
I sure hope so, but am not holding my breath. Who will disclose it and when?
Nancy Pelosi likely won’t be the Chairman of the 2012 Democratic National Convention. The current Chairman of the Democratic National Commitee, Tim Kaine, will nominate someone for chair of the convention sometime this year. Whomever that is will be responsible for signing those presidential nomination forms that go out to the states.
Representative Debbie Wasserman Schultz is the new Chair of the Democratic National Committee.
Okay, then she will shortly nominate a chair for the convention.
While I agree with you on that, that solution does not address the root of the problem, and that is that we, a free people, elected this communist fraud willingly.
Attempting to pull the weed up but not the root will result in another weed growing back meaning we will just elect the next socialist/ communist without having learned our lesson.
We, the voters, caused this problem. We, the voters, must solve this problem. This is our duty as it is we who must guard our freedom. Not judges, not congressmen, not senators, but we, the people.
“WHY does Obama have a Connecticut SSN ?”
I’m getting that put on a bumper sticker, or a T-shirt at the very least. And yes, I can attack Obama on his record and his non-eligibility and chew bum at the same time. I can also attempt to educate my fellow citizens at every opportunity, and try to get the word out in other, asymmetrical ways (WheresGeorge style) at every opportunity.
“And never forget this, either. Hillary and Bill have always gotten revenge. . .”
Yup. And don’t forget this gem: “A few years ago, this guy would have been getting us coffee.” - Bill Clinton
You are right. Remember this? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6M7Rp_Ghv6k&feature=youtu.be
That is one of the best arguments on this subject that I’ve ever read. Not to detract from Larry’s excellent article in any way, but DUDE! Just. Wow. And brief enough that my (and others’) attention span can maintain a grip throughout.
Thanks for this.
Yes, I saw that Hawaii got a different one than the rest of the States. As I recall, Hawaii’s did not say that Barry was eligible explicitly, but the other state’s did. What was that lie supposed to accomplish? In my book, it proves Pelosi knew she was breaking the law.
sfl
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.