Posted on 05/19/2011 6:28:25 PM PDT by Red Steel
Re: Legal proof that President Obama’s Certificate of Live Birth is a forgery.
Dear Sir/Madam,
I have irrefutably proven that the Certificate of Live Birth that President Obama presented to the world on April 27, 2011 is a fraudulently created document put together using the Adobe Photoshop or Illustrator programs and the creation of this forgery of a public document constitutes a class B felony in Hawaii and multiple violations under U.S. Code section Title 18, Part 1, Chapter 47, Sec.1028, and therefore an impeachable offense. When this comes to the public’s attention, it will be the greatest scandal in the country’s history—nothing comes even close. This will surpass the all previous scandals including the Watergate scandal of the Nixon administration.
My Credentials
I have a unique background for analyzing this document. I owned a typesetting company for 11 years so I know type and form design very well. I currently own Archive Index Systems since 1993, which sells all types of document scanners worldwide and also developed document imaging software (TheRepository). I know how the scanners work. I have also sold other document imaging programs, such as Laser. Fiche, Liberty and Alchemy. I have sold and installed document imaging systems in city and county governments, so I know their procedures with imaging systems and everything about the design of such programs. This will be important in understanding what has happened with Obama’s Certificate of Live Birth.
What President Obama Presented to the Public is an alleged Certificate of Live Birth.
What President Obama presented is not the hospital birth certificate. The birth certificate would have the imprint of the baby’s footprint, weight, length and other information such as the religion. The Birth Certificate would be the source of the same information that would be typed onto the Certificate of Live Birth (the Long Form). What President Obama released is supposedly the Long Form that the County gets from the hospital, which is typed on a blank form given to the hospitals by the county. That copy is then mailed to the county Board of Health and kept as a legal government document. On Obama’s form (Figure 1) the County Clerk supposedly hand stamped the form on the upper right hand corner with a bates stamp. The number is a sequential number that reflects the sequence of Certificates that come into the County Health Department. The reason I know it was stamped by hand is because the number is crooked. The County Clerk also hand stamps the date of acceptance (box 20 and box 22). Obama’s Long Form was supposedly received on August 8, 1961, four days after his birth.
Continued in SCRIBD document below...
News Release: Legal proof that President Obama’s Certificate of Live Birth is a forgery.
and typed on the same day in the same hospital? ;-)
Yep. Once, I was trying to pull one of those books out of the rolly shelf thingy and pulled so hard that the spine ripped off and I ended up in the floor. The book itself never budged.
The funniest thing is watching all the gumby suckups contorting themselves trying to say it’s not a forgery.
ROTFMAOPIMP!!!!!!
You're funnier than Lauren and Hardy. Thanks for the chuckles.
- - - - - - - - - - -
Yeah, from a guy who spent all of last evening, did an all nighter, and good portion of this morning on this thread. He even lamented up the thread he had to go for a couple of days and he would get taken advantage of in his absence. Oh please ....LoL.
” come up with, similar examples of documents posted to the internet prior to April of this year.”
excellent point! the naysayers are long on words, and short on documents and examples.
and when people like bluecat6, in post 259 above show actual documents, more and more evidence of forgery comes out. (i had wondered about the halo, but until bluecat6 studied, i thought it might be legitimate...)
one has to ask, why do they argue so strenuously, when even the margins, lack of aging, etc., scream “fraud”? never mind the clear cut technical points you, bluecat6, and others make... in fact, it was the trolls, that initially made me curious, and made me study this so much...
kerning is actual overlap of the letters vertically- not just close
I think you’re right.
Somebody told me he lives in Washington now; not sure how that conclusion was reached. Looking at the reports, CNN claims that Waidelich is “a current resident of the state”.
Ah, I see now; intelius has Washington listed. See http://www.intelius.com/results.php?ReportType=1&formname=name&qf=Stig&qmi=&qn=Waidelich&qcs=&focusfirst=1
But his facebook page at http://www.facebook.com/people/Stig-Waidelich/100001555231829 says he lives in Honolulu. He went to college in Washington. So that explains that.
OK, they didn’t fly him in. Still I don’t believe it is an accident that a person born on the same day as Obama was chosen for this, nor that the Fogbow folks were so quick to jump on this.
I’m trying to take a break from all this stuff, but keep responding to posts at my blog. Given that there’s so much disinformation about the BC numbering issue I should probably do a post on it, if I can get my computer to cooperate; I’m having lots of troubles. One question I have regards the particular kind of stamp that was mentioned by the guy who wrote the analysis at http://www.scribd.com/fullscreen/55594183
. He referred to a stamp that automatically forwards serially. If that is what was actually used, then there is no way that they could have turned back the stamp to make Nordyke’s BC#’s 200+ numbers earlier when they stamped the Nordyke BC’s on Aug 11th. I wonder how a person could find out exactly what kind of stamp they used.
Anyway, here’s what I posted in regards to the numbering of the BC’s:
Janice Okubo said that the “date filed by local registrar” was the date that the local registrar filed the BC, the “date accepted by state registrar” was the date that the state registrar accepted and gave the BC a number, and the two terms were combined into the term “date filed” in the current computer system because for Oahu BC’s those were the same dates.
The HDOH Administrative Rules refer to the assignment of the state file number/certificate number as the state’s official acceptance of the record – which is significant because after that point any amendments, additions, or deletions have to be noted on the BC and render the BC no longer prima facie evidence in legal proceedings.
That’s why the 1955 article at http://www.wnd.com/files/CHARLESBENNETT.pdf refers to the registrar checking with the hospital if there are any questions or discrepancies. The registrar would want to get that ironed out before filing the BC, because mistakes could cause legal problems for the registrant later. Hawaii statute also allowed the local registrar to register unattended births, and there was a 30-day window for the registrar to collect supplemental information in such a case without the penalty of being marked “late” or “altered”.
Page 5 of the CDC’s 1961 Natality Report also says that the local registrar checks for completeness and genuineness of the information before filing it and sending it on to the state registrar.
So when the local registrar is satisfied that the BC is correct, he sends it on to the state registrar, who then stamps it with a certificate number and stamps the date on it. We can tell that by the way the certificate number and date stamps look. They are not typed; they are stamped.
If Stig Waidelich’s BC says “date filed” is Aug 8, then that is the date it was given a number. Same with Obama’s. On Aug 8th, the Nordyke BC’s were not even in the state registrar’s office, so there is no way that anybody could have alphabetized Waidelich’s with the Nordykes’. On Aug 8th they used their date stamper and their certificate number stamper and put those stamps on Waidelich’s BC. And on Obama’s BC.
But those certificate numbers are higher than the certificate numbers that were stamped on the Nordyke BC’s. IOW, the HDOH wants us to believe that they stamped those numbers on the Obama and Waidelich BC’s and then 3 days later they backed up their adjustable certificate number stamp 200+ numbers and used that number on the 2 Nordyke girls’ BC’s.
No way.
Nordyes’ say “Honolulu, Oahu” and 0h0m0’s says “Honolulu, Hawaii”.
Hm.
Each island is a county. I got married in Makena, Maui Hawaii.
and the color aberrations? They are missing in many places indicating the text was not scanned at all, but “edited in.” DO you have an explanation for that?
Denninger video covers this also.
Does a dead person have a right to privacy? I don’t think so.
The Dunham’s do apparently (SAD’s immigration and passport records, hospital medical records, etc.)
I think you’re right.
Somebody told me he lives in Washington now; not sure how that conclusion was reached. Looking at the reports, CNN claims that Waidelich is “a current resident of the state”.
Ah, I see now; intelius has Washington listed. See http://www.intelius.com/results.php?ReportType=1&formname=name&qf=Stig&qmi=&qn=Waidelich&qcs=&focusfirst=1
But his facebook page at http://www.facebook.com/people/Stig-Waidelich/100001555231829 says he lives in Honolulu. He went to college in Washington. So that explains that.
Washington State??? Has to be a connection (family, church, local communist party affiliation, etc) with Obama, either directly or indirectly.
I lived in HI for years and counties are a big deal there. Why would Nordykes’ have the county, Oahu, and Zero’s have just the state?
More evidence it’s made up trash by simpletons on dope.
LOL! The only things taking advantage of him is 0h0m0, and the dude’s own mis-mananged mind and judgement.
Still snickering - “friendly” - HAHAH!! and he “dislikes” 0h0m0 as much as we do...
Oops, he didn’t even use the strong word “dislikes” - it’s “I don’t like 0h0m0 any more than the rest of you do” - thus admitting that “we” and “him” are in two different groups (aka “conservatives” and “leftist tools”), and he couldn’t bring himself to use any stronger language against the UIC. (Usurper in Chief)
Actually Maui county include Molokai but that’s neither here nor there. Hawaii County is of course the Big Island.
I did go and find a Google pdf of AiW. It's pretty obvious to me that Google has done postprocessing on the text. All of the letters are a true black and fully formed.
The book I looked at has at least a few line drawings which are much more like signatures to any software Google might use. I'd be much more impressed if you found an example of multiple pixelation in one of the drawings.
ML/NJ
I don't see that. Look at the "stairsteps" going up the left side of the 'a' in both images. They are the same size. It's just that some of the steps (i.e., pixels) on the AP image are shades of gray rather than full black. Thats called anti-aliasing, and it's something graphics programs do to make the stairsteps less noticeable so the line appear smoother. But it's not evidence of higher resolution.
ML/NJ
The term "justified" is meaningless when you talk about one line of type. In both cases, the typewritten stuff just appears somewhere in the middle of the box. In fact, on Obama's the typewriting in some of the boxes lines up better with the left side of the preprinted text than it does on the Nordyke's.
PING
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.