Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Poll: 46% of Americans will "Definitely Not Vote for Obama"
Pundit Press ^ | 4/26/2011 | Aurelius

Posted on 04/26/2011 8:02:24 AM PDT by therightliveswithus

With his base of supporters crumbling and his polls tanking because of high gas prices and the economy, President Obama is facing more bad news today. In a new poll released earlier today, an astounding 46% of Americans stated that they would "definitely not vote for" President Obama.

In the 2008 race, Obama received 53% of the vote against 46% for John McCain and Sarah Palin. This new poll takes into consideration those voters who did not cast a ballot in 2008, including some that may have come of age in the previous three years.

This news has serious implications for the President, who just recently announced that he would be running for a second term in office; namely, that only 54% of Americans would even consider voting for him at all.

(Excerpt) Read more at punditpress.blogspot.com ...


TOPICS: Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: 2012; obama; poll
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041 next last
To: therightliveswithus
Just because 46% “won't vote for obama” doesn't mean they will automatically vote for the republican.
21 posted on 04/26/2011 8:33:59 AM PDT by A Texan (Oderint dum metuant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: therightliveswithus

Probably the same 46% who didn’t vote for him the first time around. I am no longer willing to underestimate the stupidity of the majority of American voters. Make that people who vote in American elections...not all of whom are American.


22 posted on 04/26/2011 8:36:06 AM PDT by pgkdan ( "Wherever the Catholic sun doth shine / There's always laughter and good red wine / ...Belloc)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: therightliveswithus
Are you sure there will be Presidential election in 2012? Obummer has several executive orders at his disposal (left by predecessors) that he could use to prevent election.

Far fectched? Was Government Motors conceivable ten years ago? Or $1T gift to the banks only 5 years ago?

Or $3T bailout of foreign banks on U.S. taxpayer's dime only two years ago?

23 posted on 04/26/2011 8:36:40 AM PDT by DTA (U.S. CENTCOM vs. U.S. AFRICOM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: therightliveswithus

James Buchanan was by a huge margin the second worst president in history (and only second place if you pretend that Obama qualifies for the job he has usurped), and I’d still vote for Buchanan’s decomposed body over Obama. Carter takes third place, and he’s still breathing, so he can still make the terrible mistakes he’s famous for, but I’d take Carter over the communist thug currently occupying our White House.


24 posted on 04/26/2011 8:38:15 AM PDT by Pollster1 (Natural born citizen of the USA, with the birth certificate to prove it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: therightliveswithus
" In a new poll released earlier today, an astounding 46% of Americans stated that they would "definitely not vote for" President Obama."

So all the democrats need to do to get a plurality is split the opposition by encouraging a third party. Those of us who find Romney or Huckabee objectionable might assist Obama's reelection by bolting the GOP. Watch it happen

25 posted on 04/26/2011 8:39:58 AM PDT by muir_redwoods (Obama. Chauncey Gardiner without the homburg.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Louis Foxwell
How is it only you and I see that?

We were looking at it with our LYING eyes. lol.

I fear too many think Obama is going to be easy to defeat. I thought that of Clinton, and learned incumbency is difficult to defeat. If the GOP puts up another Dole/McCain/dullard, they will lose again.
26 posted on 04/26/2011 8:45:07 AM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Howie66

Hmmm, I thought He was the Wookies pet.


27 posted on 04/26/2011 8:45:57 AM PDT by Dave278 (Keep your change I will keep my freedom!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jersey117

How about on his knees in Boystown.


28 posted on 04/26/2011 8:47:35 AM PDT by wetgundog (" Extremism in the Defense of Liberty is no Vice")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy

Furthermore, it is 46% of all Americans won’t vote for Obama, not likely voters.

In 2008, voter turnout was 57% of the voting age population, thus 43% of those who could vote, didn’t.

So, I could say that in 2008, at least 43% of all Americans didn’t consider voting for Obama (they didn’t consider voting for anybody).


29 posted on 04/26/2011 8:47:49 AM PDT by kidd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: therightliveswithus

Obama’s negatives are huge.

He won with all the blacks, Hispanics, Jews, liberals, lifelong Dems, and plenty of independents. Several radio talk show hosts here in LA who are to the right of center voted for him too.

He has lost all the independents, all the crossover Pubs, half the Jews and Hispanics, and every lifelong Dem who lost his or her job or 401k. Gone. They will not vote for him even with his $2 bil spending on his campaign.

Obama only has blacks and liberals. Period.


30 posted on 04/26/2011 8:54:14 AM PDT by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: therightliveswithus

The SCOTUS did not say the case would not be heard. They said that they will wait until the other 15 cases have been decided in the lower courts and then rule on all the cases at once.


31 posted on 04/26/2011 9:00:14 AM PDT by i are a cowboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: databoss

Yeh wait until next year when gas is $6 per gallon and every night is beat whitey night on the train.


32 posted on 04/26/2011 9:06:35 AM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy
Of the remaining 54%, only 31% stated that they would "definitely vote for" the President. That leaves only 23% of voters who would simply consider voting for him. Worse for the President, this means that 15% more Americans would never vote for him than vote for him.

-----------------------------------------------

If those numbers hold, Obama gets a second term with about the same electoral vote margin he got in 2008. Those numbers are not encouraging to the GOP candidate.

Really? You seem to assume that all of the 23% "considering" will vote for Obama. They are the undecideds. I can't imagine worse numbers for Obama at this stage. There is still a long way to go, but these numbers are devastating. The Reps just have to get 5% or 6% of the undecideds and they will coast to victory.

Election day is still far away and the numbers can change dramatically, but to say that these numbers are not encouraging to the Reps is pure sophistry.

33 posted on 04/26/2011 9:15:14 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Lazlo in PA
Even his own people have said...

You mean Eric Holder's people.

:>)

34 posted on 04/26/2011 9:24:29 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (When and why did Steve Dunham change his name to Barack Hussein Obama? When he converted to Islam?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: kabar

What really stinks is that those 23% of the voters now get to define the entire agenda for the next election...


35 posted on 04/26/2011 9:36:23 AM PDT by Little Ray (The Gods of the Copybook Heading, with terror and slaughter return!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: A Texan
Just because 46% “won't vote for obama” doesn't mean they will automatically vote for the republican.

It's not going to be the folks who vote that will determine the next president - it will be the folks who stay home.

36 posted on 04/26/2011 9:54:38 AM PDT by The Duke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Little Ray

I don’t think so. The 46% should define it for Reps. Obama will have to move more to the center to attract the undecideds where he has a real problem compared to 2008. The 2012 election will be a referendum on Obama. Hope and change won’t cut it anymore. Obama has a record—and it ain’t good.


37 posted on 04/26/2011 9:55:18 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]



Don't Let Free Republic Fall to Pieces

Click the Pic
Sign up to donate monthly
and a sponsoring FReeper will donate $10

Save Lazamataz!

38 posted on 04/26/2011 10:04:42 AM PDT by TheOldLady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Georgia Girl 2

That’s a rosy prediction...why would it be beat Whitey?


39 posted on 04/26/2011 10:04:56 AM PDT by databoss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Scanian
He can wait another 8 months and then throw open the drilling permit floodgates in the Gulf, Alaska, and wherever else and oil will drop significantly overnight from sheer psychology and Hussein will portray himself as a hero who “took pity” on the longsuffering American public.

I think (hope) that he's too damned ideological for his own good. Doing the right thing is too un-Marxist for his taste.
40 posted on 04/26/2011 10:12:14 AM PDT by youngidiot (Hear Hear!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson