The Jay Treaty Strongly Indicates That Obama Is Not Eligible To Be President.

naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com ^ | 03/02/2011 | Leo Donofrio, Esq

[rxsid]

HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN?

[rxsid]

Ping!

"The Jay Treaty Strongly Indicates That Obama Is Not Eligible To Be President."

[screaminsunshine]

So why the Hell are the Republicans not raising hell about it?

[phockthis]

sfl

[JohnKinAK]

They are all tools of the ruling elite. When his usefulness is gone, he'll be removed and replaced with another tool. Until then all this talk is just pipe dreams of the serfs. We no longer live in a Free Republic, it is a feudalistic police state. Maybe one day enough citizens will wake up to this fact and decide to change it.

[melancholy]

The Jay Treaty Strongly Indicates That Obama Is Not Eligible To Be President.

So what? The Gay Treaty indicates the opposite!

Stop besmirching 0h0m0llah and don't ask me for links because the documentation isn't published yet. The paperwork is shoved and sealed in the new WH social director's ass and locked up by Reggie's dead bolt!

[SuzyQue]

Well, because many of them, as with most people, are status-quo types, and as such, are part of the problem.

[screaminsunshine]

If there is time.

[Diogenesis]

“My people say your Constitution, future elections, and America are now dead ---
like your rights, freedoms and grandchildren’s equities, you stupid, powerless crackers.”

---

"Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction.
We didn't pass it to our children in the bloodstream.
It must be fought for, protected, and handed on for them to do the same,
or one day we will spend our sunset years telling our children
and our children's children what it was once like in the United States where men were free."
President Ronald Reagan

---

[FrankR]

[STARWISE]

BRITISH SUBJECTS ARE NOT TO BE RECOGNIZED AS US
NATIVES ACCORDING TO THE JAY TREATY.

And herein lies the proverbial “smoking gun” with regard
to Obama’s ineligibility to be President.

Pay special attention to the following text taken from
Article IX, “…and may grant, sell or devise the same to
whom they please, in like manner as if they were natives…”

The statement – “as if they were natives” – strongly
indicates that, by this treaty, both countries agreed
that British subjects were not “natives” of the US and
could not be considered “natives” of the US.

Article IX simply carves out an exception to this rule
which allows British subjects to be considered “as if”
they were natives of the US.

There were numerous policies in play at the time this
treaty was signed which could have influenced this
choice of words. (But more on that in the forthcoming
part 2 of this report.)

http://tinyurl.com/46oy368

Go, Leo! Lord guide, protect and strengthen a brave soul
to the effective methods, perseverence and resources to
successfuly take this issue finally to SCOTUS for
irrevocable and definitive Constitutional clarity.

[Brown Deer]

but it doesn’t matter because the only evidence that any judge needs is the press release of Fukino! ;-)

[butterdezillion]

Does anybody know what’s happening with Leo - if he’s at a point in the litigation he’s involved in where he can (and intends to) confront the eligibility issue on a legal level?

It would be a great time for it, with the state eligibility bills coming up.

[Faith]

Go, Leo! Lord guide, protect and strengthen a brave soul to the effective methods, perseverence and resources to successfuly take this issue finally to SCOTUS for irrevocable and definitive Constitutional clarity.

Amen! Hallelujah!

[Kenny Bunk]

Hi, Butter, http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/ Leo is still working on approaching the Federal District DC Bench for the Writ of Quo Warranto. He really needs an ironclad plaintiff.

Tomorrow, BTW, is the recalled conference on Hemenway's motions. Major event.

[Mr Rogers]

Yeah...everyone knows Obama is a loyal subject of the Queen!

[rxsid]

"So why the Hell are the Republicans not raising hell about it?"

Because the majority of them, aside from the freshman, where complicit in the "certification" of Barry during the 111th Congress!

Think they want to open an investigation into how THEY certified someone born owing allegiance to the crown of her majesty the Queen of England? They would essentially be investigating themselves as well. Not going to happen.

I recently sent a written letter to my "representative." Wanting to keep the letter very short and to the point, the body of the letter consisted of just 1 sentence.

Can someone who is a born British subject be considered a "natural born Citizen" of the United States?

I didn't mention Barry's name, or the issue with his birth certificate.

The reply I got back, no joke....was (I paraphrase)...Obama has shown his Hawaiian birth certificate, we should all respect the political process even though we may not agree with his politics.

I was shocked at the ridiculous response...then quickly realized that I shouldn't be.

At that point, it become obvious to me that those from the 111th Congress that are still there...are NOT going to do a damn thing about this.

[rxsid]

"Yeah...everyone knows Obama is a loyal subject of the Queen!"

He may, or may not be "loyal"...but assuming Sr. was his legal father at birth, he was obviously born a subject of the Queen. By birthright.

“When Barack Obama Jr. was born on Aug. 4,1961, in Honolulu, Kenya was a British colony, still part of the United Kingdom’s dwindling empire. As a Kenyan native, Barack Obama Sr. was a British subject whose citizenship status was governed by The British Nationality Act of 1948. That same act governed the status of Obama Sr.‘s children.

http://fightthesmears.com/articles/5/birthcertificate.html

Factcheck.org goes on to say this about Obama Sr., Jr. and the British Nationality Act of 1948:

In other words, at the time of his birth, Barack Obama Jr. was both a U.S. citizen (by virtue of being born in Hawaii)* and a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies (or the UKC) by virtue of being born to a father who was a citizen of the UKC.

http://www.factcheck.org/askfactcheck/does_barack_obama_have_kenyan_citizenship.html

[STARWISE]

No idea.

[StonyBurk]

Because you silly silly Republicans don’t do that! they allow the Democrats to dictate and manipulate the Conversation—and when the “useful idiots violate the law-and REASON as has happened in Wis. Then Republicans still don’t do anything they are the real life version of Veggie Tales Pirates that don’t do anything —only they are called politicians.