BRITISH SUBJECTS ARE NOT TO BE RECOGNIZED AS US
NATIVES ACCORDING TO THE JAY TREATY.
And herein lies the proverbial “smoking gun” with regard
to Obama’s ineligibility to be President.
Pay special attention to the following text taken from
Article IX, “…and may grant, sell or devise the same to
whom they please, in like manner as if they were natives…”
The statement – “as if they were natives” – strongly
indicates that, by this treaty, both countries agreed
that British subjects were not “natives” of the US and
could not be considered “natives” of the US.
Article IX simply carves out an exception to this rule
which allows British subjects to be considered “as if”
they were natives of the US.
There were numerous policies in play at the time this
treaty was signed which could have influenced this
choice of words. (But more on that in the forthcoming
part 2 of this report.)
Go, Leo! Lord guide, protect and strengthen a brave soul
to the effective methods, perseverence and resources to
successfuly take this issue finally to SCOTUS for
irrevocable and definitive Constitutional clarity.
Does anybody know what’s happening with Leo - if he’s at a point in the litigation he’s involved in where he can (and intends to) confront the eligibility issue on a legal level?
It would be a great time for it, with the state eligibility bills coming up.
Amen! Hallelujah!