Posted on 11/21/2010 5:02:43 PM PST by Talkradio03
Huckabee: “No question, she will be a very, very strong presence and force, if she gets in,” Huckabee told reporters in Des Moines Sunday. “You know, she may run away with it. And that’s one of those things everyone needs to be prepared for"
(Excerpt) Read more at hapblog.com ...
...and Palin will win, despite that POS TokyoRove Establishment punk who nearly single handed killed the Republican Party during the Bush years.
Just for your education, this country and its drones put a laughingstock in office 2008. So, blow it out your a**.
I like Huckabuck but he’s not the one.
I see the laughingstock comment hit a nerve. Thanks for the education, Catrus.
Any way the Conservatives Win!
This is the TRUTH, that the puppies that says she is too hated don't realize, They will all be 3 years behind Palin in knowing how to fight, THE SAID ALL THE SAME THINGS ABOUT REAGAN TOO! BUT REAGAN IS NO PALIN, SHE HAS A NORMAL FAMILY!
Real men will vote for Palin because they knows she has more balls then 99% of the men they know, either way the majority of men will vote Republican. Men have not voted for dems for president 70 years!
Because of Sarah Palin the Woman voted Republican in the midterms November 2nd, 2019 for the First time every!
The only men who will vote for Zero are THOSE FOR GAY MARRIGE, and those men jealous of Sarah Palin’s BALLS!
No.
Palin’s lead in terms of taking a stand against the anti-Constitutionalist subversives who think they will destroy our country.
Sarah Palin always makes the first move against them, then others follow.
Maybe they’re as smart as those who think Palin’s resignation will prevent her election in 2012.
This would explain why they can’t lead on anything.
Your position on this topic: we should elect someone other than Sarah Palin, even thought they have been too wimpy to take the lead on defending our Constitution.
Even though they have established a pattern of following behind Palin on these matters, after she takes the first courageous stand.
The only logical conclusion is that you want to elect a weak, limp-wristed follower who will be trampled by ruling class operatives once in the white house. Why?
Can you articulate precisely why these actions are objectionable?
Or is your objection merely an emotional reaction that you don’t really understand?
Or maybe they’re too busy actually doing the job they were elected to do and just don’t have the time to twitter or go fishing for the cameras....finishing your job, what a novel idea,
Too busy to lead.
What a great campaign strategy.
Palin might be OK as prez, Huckabee I can’t take seriously. Romney is a fraud.
Bobby Jindal, on the other hand, has what it would take to go through the leftists in 2012 like Rosie O’Donnell through a cheesecake factory. He makes Obama look like the Marxist dullard the man really is and will destroy him like incendiary bombs falling on Dresden.
Jindal 2012.
Quit spreading BS about sex and voting.
1964 was the first time that women voted more Democrat than men.
Women voted Republican in 1960, and Democrat in 1964, while men voted Democrat in BOTH of those elections.
Eisenhower won 6% more approval from female voters than males in both of his elections.
It would be nice to give the RINO’s a resounding defeat right off the bat.
^^^
Indeed, it would.
And anybody who still thinks the Huckster would be a good choice is not too bright.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.