Posted on 04/24/2010 1:17:11 PM PDT by thecraw
Anderson Cooper needs to be arrested and sent to Gitmo. I'm glad I don't get CNN! This dimwit said that Hawaii doesn't have Obama's original birth certificate(we know that) as it was transferred to an electronic server, Scumbag Cooper said. Anyone that's researched this issue knows that is NOT the case. Hawaii officials have already said they maintain Obama's original vital records, on file, and WOULD release them with OBAMA'S consent. What Hawaii has on file is an Act-96 application type form(s), most likely some adoption amendment type record attached, via Indonesian Citizen Lolo Soetoro...
(Excerpt) Read more at obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com ...
The issue of Natural Born Citizen was brought against John McCain long before Barrack was nominated to the DNC as a Presidential Candidate.
In fact, in order to place McCain on the ballot the United States Senate went so far as to craft the Senate Resolution 511 proclaiming John McCain a Natural Born Citizen.
There is a cloud over Barrack's birth, to be sure. But the fact that still remains is his birth was of a divided nationality British and American. One is wholly one thing or another but not completely two things at the same time.
Senate Resolution 511
Recognizing that John Sidney McCain, III, is a natural born citizen.
Whereas the Constitution of the United States requires that, to be eligible for the Office of the President, a person must be a `natural born Citizen’ of the United States;
Whereas the term `natural born Citizen’, as that term appears in Article II, Section 1, is not defined in the Constitution of the United States;
Whereas there is no evidence of the intention of the Framers or any Congress to limit the constitutional rights of children born to Americans serving in the military nor to prevent those children from serving as their country’s President;
Whereas such limitations would be inconsistent with the purpose and intent of the `natural born Citizen’ clause of the Constitution of the United States, as evidenced by the First Congress’s own statute defining the term `natural born Citizen’;
Whereas the well-being of all citizens of the United States is preserved and enhanced by the men and women who are assigned to serve our country outside of our national borders;
Whereas previous presidential candidates were born outside of the United States of America and were understood to be eligible to be President; and
Whereas John Sidney McCain, III, was born to American citizens on an American military base in the Panama Canal Zone in 1936: Now, therefore, be it
Resolved, That John Sidney McCain, III, is a `natural born Citizen’ under Article II, Section 1, of the Constitution of the United States.
Now, let us take this simple and explore its hidden meaning.
Whereas the Constitution of the United States requires that, to be eligible for the Office of the President, a person must be a `natural born Citizen’ of the United States;
They apparently have read the Constitution and have zeroed in on one clause that no law or legislative body has the right to amend.
Whereas the term `natural born Citizen’, as that term appears in Article II, Section 1, is not defined in the Constitution of the United States;
The term ‘natural born citizen’ is not defined, however other rulings by the Supreme Court, Congress, and other writings from such as John Bingham, do define what a ‘natural born citizen’ is. For sake of space I will only quote the following.
The Constitution does not, in words, say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common-law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners. Some authorities go further and include as citizens children born within the jurisdiction without reference to the citizenship of their parents. As to this class there have been doubts, but never as to the first.
-Chief Justice Waite in Minor v. Happersett (1875)
http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/historics/USSC_CR_0088_0162_Z…
Whereas there is no evidence of the intention of the Framers or any Congress to limit the constitutional rights of children born to Americans serving in the military nor to prevent those children from serving as their country’s President;
So the Senate decided to make assumptions and attempt to pass a ‘Gentleman’s Agreement’ on the same. We have already seen from the prior statement that they claimed to have no knowledge of the meaning, and its definition.
Whereas such limitations would be inconsistent with the purpose and intent of the `natural born Citizen’ clause of the Constitution of the United States, as evidenced by the First Congress’s own statute defining the term `natural born Citizen’;
So the Senate decided to make assumptions and attempt to pass a ‘Gentleman’s Agreement’ on the same. We have already seen from the prior statement that they have no knowledge of the meaning, and its definition.
Whereas the well-being of all citizens of the United States is preserved and enhanced by the men and women who are assigned to serve our country outside of our national borders;
It sounds nice, but means nothing? Some fluff but again means nothing.
Whereas previous presidential candidates were born outside of the United States of America and were understood to be eligible to be President; and
Whom are they referring to, that was born ‘outside’ the United States and who deemed them eligible?
Whereas John Sidney McCain, III, was born to American citizens on an American military base in the Panama Canal Zone in 1936: Now, therefore, be it
Resolved, That John Sidney McCain, III, is a `natural born Citizen’ under Article II, Section 1, of the Constitution of the United States.
So the Senate gave by law, what nature failed to do. Would that not be a ‘naturalized’ citizenship?
So the Senate deemed that two (2) American or US Citizen parents was an essential to the definition of a ‘natural born citizen’ that was not defined in the Constitution. So how did they deem that the issue was being born outside the jurisdiction of the United States if they had no definition or requirements of what ‘constituted’ a ‘natural born citizen?’ It seems like they know the definition, but are hoping the American public doesn’t. There is but one defintion that a ‘natural born citizen’ has to have citizen parents and being born in country and that is Vattel’s Law of Nations.
As I refered to SR 511. SR511 is a non-binding, non-lawful understanding, that can not be held as a LAW. Being such, a non-binding resolution is a written motion adopted by a deliberative body that cannot progress into a law. The substance of the resolution can be anything that can normally be proposed as a motion.This type of resolution is often used to express the body’s approval or disapproval of something which they cannot otherwise vote on, due to the matter being handled by another jurisdiction, or being protected by a constitution.
Again, I will note: being protected by a constitution.
“Simple resolutions do not require the approval of the other house nor the signature of the President, and they do not have the force of law.”
The reason I make this point is that for the chance that John Mccain would have actually won the 2008 Presidential election. The issue of his eligibility not only would have been brought up, but would have stated congressional hearings, the likes of Watergate all over again. The Congress would have in no time instituted articles of impeachment and the motion would have been approved. Then the Senate would have their chance to remove John McCain, however since they already have voted with their ‘Gentlemen’s Agreement’, regardless how the vote went. A non-binding, non-lawful resolution that trumps the United States Constitution could be waved in front of the American public, and John McCain, could go back in the corner, stick his thumb in his pie, and exclaim “Oh, what a good boy am I.”
Senate Resolution 511, was an attempt to circumvent the United States Constitution, and amend the ‘Natural Born Citizen’ Clause of which there has NEVER been an amendment or change too.
More then just a non-binding resolution, SR511 defined John McCain’s eligibility based on being born of US Parents [NOTE the plural] but outside the country. Therefore the only alternative based on THEIR wording is ‘born in country’. They did not change the requirement of two (2) US parents.
Where is there a definition as to a ‘Natural Born Citizen’ based on parents [again plural] and born in country? Vattel’s Law of Nations.
Why if John McCain was held to these requirements, was Barack Obama not held of being born of US Parents [plural] and in the United States.
Barack Obama has admitted that not only was his father a foreign national, but that he himself was a British Subject at birth. A British Subject is a foreign national and how can a foreign national be a ‘Natural Born Citizen’ as required by the United States Constitution?
Bill, if it has been answered then it shouldn’t be a problem to answer it again, should it?
That’s why I use Skoal or Redman.
All we need is Arizona. If he runs again and refuses to show the docs then everyone around the country will know somethings wrong.
Almost everything but his love of Marxism!
Happily WND is reporting that Georgia is considering the same type of bill: http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=144909
Let the floodgates open!!!
The more the merrier but i truly believe all it took was the one. Hopefully he will find half the country with laws like that and not even bother running.
I’ve been around a long time. I remember the “hissy fit”
the State-run media had when there was an “18-minute gap”
in the Nixon White House Tapes. They ranted and raved for months and months about the missing 18 minutes. Now, there is a missing or unproducable BC and the State-run media is a silent as an old lady sitting alone at the church service.
Amazing, simply amazing. And as I will continue to say, unless or until the State-run media makes this an issue, nothing and I mean absolutely nothing will come of this fiasco on the American public.
I dont know what is more amazing, the fact that we have a president who refuses to release his BC or the fact that the press wont even ask him about it?
All we need is Arizona. If he runs again and refuses to show the docs then everyone around the country will know somethings wrong.
_______________________________________
Wrong. The State Run media will continue to cover for him regardless. Anyone who is half-way informed KNOWS something is wrong now!
Can you imagine a Republican president saying something like Obama said....”... don’t challenge my faith, or my citizenship...” Can you imagine what the reaction of the liberal media would have been. Front page stories, and NOT silence (like now).
ROFL! I watched this video of Cooper a couple of more times. It looks like this AZ bill has really got his panties (or his tights?) in a wad! "She" is really talking fast, and sweating big time over this one! HAHAHAHAHAHA!
Do I sense that FINALLY we're getting some traction on the Long Legged Mack Daddy's eligibility?
The nerve of anyone in this regime talking about tax dollars being well served. The law -baring lawsuits by democrats and Obama - should cost next to nothing to implement, yet, Obama and gang have bankrupted our nation without producing much in return.
A. Cooper?
Is that the gay boy on CNN?
I never watch CNN, im not into the whole “gay scene” thing.
Watch Quickly Before this video is Pulled.
Obama IS a Muslim
http://www.youtube.com/watch_popup?v=tCAffMSWSzY#t=28
How the Media Lied about Obama’s Birth Records [A.I.M. nails it.]
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2495129/posts
Another state considers Arizona eligibility plan [Georgia]
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2499491/posts
Michelle Obama: Kenya is Obama’s Home Country
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HLDHDfPNBME
http://www.infowars.com/michelle-obama-kenya-is-obamas-home-country
Tancredo to tea partiers: Send Obama back to Kenya
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=142825
Gibbs: ‘I could probably fill the better part of my afternoons responding to the lunacy’
—The Hill
Kenyan Minister Khalwale Asks When Obama Will Repatriate Himself
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2496454/posts
Are ABC, CBS, NBC, FactCheck, and N.Y. Times ‘birthers’ too?
McCain ‘birthers’: ABC, CBS, NBC, FactCheck, N.Y. Times
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=127362
Eligibility issue was huge in 2008 when Obama opponent was focus of attention
4 Supreme Court Cases define “natural born citizen”
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2470873/posts
[In a roundabout way, the law is arguably Birther Too]
Vattel Cited: Records of the Federal Convention1787 (Natural Born Citizen)
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2499410/posts
Arizona House OKs Birther Bill
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2496602/posts
Justice Clarence Thomas: We’re ‘evading’ eligibility
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=142101
Does testimony hint at division behind Supreme Court’s doors?
Is Obama constitutionally eligible to serve?
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=98546
WND’s complete archive of news reports on the issue
Mayor joins chorus questioning if Obama ‘American’
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=141745
‘If you’re not willing to produce birth certificate, you’ve got something to hide’
Ridicule of Conspiracy Theories Focuses On Diffusing Criticism of the Powerful
http://www.infowars.com/ridicule-of-conspiracy-theories-focuses-on-diffusing-criticism-of-the-powerful
[Limited government requires mistrust of government.]
[Certifigate] DC Knows that Obama is Ineligible for Office
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2496984/posts
Arizona “Birther” Bill Dismissed by White House, Slammed by Critics
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2497655/posts
‘Congress responsible for vetting eligibility’ [and states]
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2499297/posts
= = =
THE BIRTHER BILL, By Neal Boortz @ April 23, 2010 8:36
http://boortz.com/nealz_nuze/2010/04/the-birther-bill.html
The Arizona House legislature has passed, what is being dubbed, “the birther bill.” Essentially what it does is require that every presidential candidate that would like to appear on the ballot in 2012 must first produce a copy of his/her birth certificate.
Then I come to find out that the birther types aren’t resigned to just Arizona. They are here in my home-state of Georgia as well. We have Republican Rep. J. Mark Hatfield who introduced a bill modeled after the Arizona bill in the Goorgia legislature.
You mean this stuff hasn’t gone away yet? But ... at the risk of sounding like a “birther,” I do have one question .. and this question is born of a year of watching Obama at work; a year which has taught me that this man will do anything he thinks he can get away with to maintain and grow his power. I’ve watched him manipulate figures on unemployment and jobs creation. He’s lied about his tax policies. In his hyper-narcissistic world he can do no wrong. That just leads me to one question .. one question that has not been answered to my satisfaction: Has the State of Hawaii actually released a bona fide copy of a live birth certificate?
gnip
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.