Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama's Socialism
The American Thinker ^ | February 25, 2010 | Adam Shaw

Posted on 02/25/2010 3:31:57 AM PST by Scanian

Recently on "The O'Reilly Factor," Bill O'Reilly seemed very concerned about President Obama being described as a socialist by members of the right such as Rush Limbaugh. O'Reilly has often dodged calling the president a socialist, as if doing so would condemn Obama as a tyrannical dictator. It was discussed throughout the show with various guests, and O'Reilly frequently stated that yes, Obama is a far-left guy, but he didn't want to use the actual term "socialist." It would be too much.

Here in Britain we look at the continuing battle as to whether Obama is a socialist or not as a rather odd American quibble. In Britain we have no problem defining people as socialists, nor do people on the left have a problem calling themselves socialists. It is not that those of us on the conservative right do not believe that socialism is a bad doctrine. We do, and we see evidence of its continual destruction of the country on a day-to-day basis, but we have always had socialism living quite openly amongst us. We are therefore able to see and recognize it quite calmly as a day-to-day occurrence in politics, just as one recognizes the flu. We wish it didn't exist, but it does, and so we get on with our lives, trying to avoid catching it in the process.

When one looks back at the prime ministers that the British Labour Party has produced in the twentieth century -- James Ramsay MacDonald, Clement Attlee, Harold Wilson, James Callaghan etc. -- all have defined themselves as socialists at one time or another. Even the relatively centrist Tony Blair described himself as "Coming to Socialism through Marxism" and is a member of the Christian Socialist Movement.

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; Politics; Society
KEYWORDS: billoreilly; labourparty; leftists; marclamonthill; socialism; statism; uk; welfarestate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

1 posted on 02/25/2010 3:31:57 AM PST by Scanian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Scanian

O’Reilly is an idiot. He really is. Blowhard and idiot. He almost makes me cringe sometimes when he’s talking to somebody with real brains such as Brit Hume, Charles Krauthammer or Karl Rove. He doesn’t have the command of facts and detail he needs to be discussing about half of what he talks about. Also, interrupting his guests is just out of control. And then there’s Mark Lamont Hill. Puhleeze, what a clown.


2 posted on 02/25/2010 3:40:52 AM PST by chilltherats (First, kill all the lawyers (now that they ARE the tyrants).......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scanian
I haven't watched O'Reilly in years, but if this is true it just adds to the list of reasons to avoid him.

Obama's socialism is bad enough, but people who so describe him never take it to where Obama really is on the continuum. He's a fascist.

Adam Shaw says Obama is 'well spoken.' At least he didn't say eloquent. I suppose in some macabre way a man can be 'well spoken' and still make his listener's skin crawl. I have a hard time with 'eloquent' in that context.

3 posted on 02/25/2010 3:47:11 AM PST by stevem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chilltherats
BOR has lost his street creds with the conservative community. He's so full of himself that his smugness has become nauseating.
4 posted on 02/25/2010 3:47:14 AM PST by RU88 (Bow to no man)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RU88

Obma is a Socialist and Bill O’ Reilly is full of crap.


5 posted on 02/25/2010 3:49:19 AM PST by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Scanian

The problem with O’Reilly is that he defines himself as being a contrarian. Will always try to take an opposing view.


6 posted on 02/25/2010 3:57:35 AM PST by AdaGray
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scanian
Socialism is defined as an economic system under which the government owns the means of production.

In the past year and a half, the government has nationalized banks and 2 major car companies. Currently the government is trying to do the same to the health care industry. That pretty much fits the textbook description of socialism.

7 posted on 02/25/2010 4:04:20 AM PST by pnh102 (Regarding liberalism, always attribute to malice what you think can be explained by stupidity. - Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chilltherats

BOR goes on & on & on....I don’t know how Charles K, Rove & Hume keep their composure.


8 posted on 02/25/2010 4:05:24 AM PST by FES0844
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: AdaGray

He is a liar. He knows Obama is a Socialist and pretends he does not. He acts stupid. His whole shtick is an act.


9 posted on 02/25/2010 4:05:36 AM PST by screaminsunshine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Scanian

O’Reilly is so ridiculous. Obama catered to his ego and that was all it took for O’Reilly to be his champion.

I truly cannot stand that man. Well, either of them for that matter.


10 posted on 02/25/2010 4:05:55 AM PST by autumnraine (You can't fix stupid, but you can vote it out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chilltherats

O’Reilly is the right’s version of Biden. He is convinced of his supreme intelligence and doesn’t realize how much a moron he looks like when talking to people with REAL intelligence.


11 posted on 02/25/2010 4:13:49 AM PST by autumnraine (You can't fix stupid, but you can vote it out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Scanian
"Black Liberation" revolutionary communist Marc Lamont Hill on O'Reilly again

Posted on Tuesday, February 23, 2010 8:36:33 PM by ETL

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2457920/posts

12 posted on 02/25/2010 4:16:58 AM PST by ETL (ALL (most?) of the Obama-commie connections at my FR Home page: http://www.freerepublic.com/~etl/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FES0844

Very often you can tell that they’re just tolerating him, especially Brit and Charles. Rove seems to indulge in and engage him a small bit more.


13 posted on 02/25/2010 4:21:01 AM PST by chilltherats (First, kill all the lawyers (now that they ARE the tyrants).......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Scanian

Simply state POTUS Obama is indeed a socialist and it woul;d take very little movement on his part to become a intolerant dictator.


14 posted on 02/25/2010 4:23:00 AM PST by JLAGRAYFOX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FES0844
BOR goes on & on & on....I don’t know how Charles K, Rove & Hume keep their composure.

The only reason that I can fathom about how Bill O'R keeps his super ratings is that his show is filled with luminaries like Rove, Charles and Brit on an almost nightly basis. And I suspect the only reason these luminaries go on a put up with O'R is that he has these great ratings. I guess it's a formula that works for now.

15 posted on 02/25/2010 4:25:14 AM PST by ReleaseTheHounds ("The demagogue is one who preaches doctrines he knows to be untrue to men he knows to be idiots.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: RU88
He's so full of himself that his smugness has become nauseating.

BOR is as much a narcissist as Obama. Nausea is definitely what I get if I listen to him for more than 5 minutes.

16 posted on 02/25/2010 4:36:11 AM PST by IamConservative (Liberty is all a good man needs to succeed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: IamConservative
BOR definition of socalism ,did they governemnt take your private property.

What a joke, ask BOR ,even before Obama ow many times do you pay for you house?

17 posted on 02/25/2010 4:56:50 AM PST by scooby321
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: autumnraine

He, himself, is almost unwatchable. He does get some important stories, though. We DVR hi s show so we can skim through it and pick out what we want to watch.


18 posted on 02/25/2010 4:58:25 AM PST by chilltherats (First, kill all the lawyers (now that they ARE the tyrants).......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: FES0844

He lectures them, which is laughable. Strangely, they seen slightly bemused by him..I’t s easy to see they don’t take him seriously and likely consider him a blowhard or at least a bit of a charlatan or showman.


19 posted on 02/25/2010 5:02:22 AM PST by chilltherats (First, kill all the lawyers (now that they ARE the tyrants).......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: chilltherats

I would love to see Rush and O’Riley in a face-to-face. I might even buy a television to watch it. It doesn’t have to be a debate, just an interview of one by the other or a “discussion.” Perhaps I am guilty of wishing disaster on someone but, so be it.


20 posted on 02/25/2010 5:18:01 AM PST by arthurus ("If you don't believe in shooting abortionists, don't shoot an abortionist." -Ann C.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson