Posted on 10/07/2009 4:03:12 PM PDT by manovark
This is from Orly Taitz website as well: "Actual order from Judge Carter--my case Barnett et al v Obama et al is going to trial, dates are final, January 26 is the date for the jury trial" Posted on | October 7, 2009 | No Comments
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES GENERAL
CV-90 (12/02)
CIVIL MINUTES GENERAL Page 1 of 1 Case No. SACV09-0082 DOC (ANx) Date October 5, 2009
Title CAPTAIN PAMELA BARNETT, ET AL. V. BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, ET AL.
Present: The
Honorable
David O. Carter, U.S. District Judge
Kristee Hopkins Debbie Gale N/A
Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Tape No.
Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys Present for Defendants:
Orly Taitz
Gary Kreep
David DeJute, AUSA
Roger West, AUSA
Proceedings: 1. MOTION BY DEFENDANTS TO DISMISS CASE
2. SCHEDULING CONFERENCE
Cause called and counsel state their appearances. Argument by counsel. Motion taken
under submission.
On September 8, 2009, the Court previously set tentative case management dates. The
Court now orders those dates be made final.
Case Management dates are as follows:
Motion for Summary Judgment Hearing December 7, 2009, at 8:30 a.m.
File Motion for Summary Judgment November 16, 2009
Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment November 26, 2009
Reply to Motion for Summary Judgment November 30, 2009
Final Pretrial Conference January 11, 2010, at 8:30 a.m.
Jury Trial January 26, 2010, at 8:30 a.m.
First
FYI
Go ORLY!!! Go ORLY!!!
Excellent.
So now Orly rushes to get discovery while Obama’s lawyers rush to the ninth circuit to appeal.
bkmrk
December 7th? Hearing on Motions for Summary Judgment...
Well, ain’t that wonderful... Looks like progress is being made.
It’s time to take back the country.
Orly has won nothing so far. The motion to dismiss hasn’t been ruled on, and discovery is still stayed.
This is NOT what it appears to be. The judge did NOT rule on the MTD yet.
Don't pop the champagne quite yet.
No, this is the same info as the 400+ post thread from earlier. No new info, no decision by Judge Carter.
“jury trial” ????????????????????
: (
Jeez, that’s a clerk’s scheduling order.
Everyone has only been posting PART of this on the blogs. This is the Minutes, NOT an ORDER.
We’ve been had....again!
CIVIL MINUTES GENERAL
CV-90 (12/02)
CIVIL MINUTES GENERAL Page 1 of 1 Case No. SACV09-0082 DOC (ANx) Date October 5, 2009
No discovery, no nothing. I am so tired of the bloggers posting PARTIAL truths and getting everyone nuts only to ctash and burn. This was just reprehensible.
ctash/crash
sorry
Why announce that the dates are final if a dismissal is the next event?
Procedure, perhaps.
Thanks for not getting our hopes up, pissant! LOL. I’m expecting good news.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.