Posted on 10/06/2009 7:12:21 PM PDT by kellynla
Drunk with a delusional sense of authority, the American media has become the tool of a powerful and corrupt media conglomerate that calls the shots and picks the players. Public perception of the media has changed and the trust once enjoyed is now destroyed. The former ‘free press’ role of the media was hijacked long ago and what’s left is an echo chamber where dissenting voices are attacked personally instead of debated openly.
In place of reporting news as it breaks in an unbiased fashion, the media promotes big government while actively suppressing newsworthy events that contradict the progressive political narrative. In other words, the media has garnered scant public trust, like its messiah, Barack Hussein Obama; a.k.a. ‘the emperor with no clothes’. Whereas the media repeats government-issued talking points regaling the resplendent aura of this self-appointed emperor, we the people see naught but naked arrogance.
In order that the allusion of a ‘free press’ be maintained to a certain degree in the American market, allowances are made to facilitate the proper functioning of the pressure valve. Enough steam is released to give the allusion of ‘free speech’, but there are lines drawn in the sand that are not to be crossed under any circumstances. Untold amounts of vast wealth already invested in pre-determined outcomes prohibit the complete exercise of free speech and when breached, swift and punitive action is taken. We the people have drawn our own line in the sand and the old media is on the wrong side of it.
If an issue is suppressed or dismissed with overtures of character assassination by the old media, this tells us that it’s crucial to our freedom. The old media has become nothing more than background noise. Their agenda has been exposed as a distraction tactic to keep our attention on anything except the truth. We the people have awakened. We have emerged even stronger from the frightening realization that our freedom is at stake.
The single most suppressed series of newsworthy events currently in play in courtrooms across the country are the eligibility cases being brought against Barack Hussein Obama/Barry Soetoro. Whereas the old media along with the help of the hopelessly unhinged Left have excoriated the character of anyone who dares discuss the ‘merits’ of these legal cases; what is equally disturbing is the silence amongst conservatives on the right. Apparently, the act of speaking out on this issue is paramount to risking one’s job.
A team of Louisiana-based radio talk show hosts lost their jobs after discussing Obama’s eligibility for office with World Net Daily Editor and CEO, Joseph Farah. Daniel “Spike” Harville of the “Mike and Spike Show” was told by Ruby Collins, owner of the radio station, that she was “afraid of the Obama administration sending a bunch of lawyers, the IRS and the FCC to close her down, so we needed to cool it.” G. Michael Lee also of the “Mike and Spike Show” was told to “tone down political talk” and not to mention Obama again. (source: www.wnd.com)
Callers who bring up the eligibility issue on air with talk radio hosts are dismissed quickly and without further discussion. Try calling into a radio station on this issue. If your question is actually aired live, watch how fast your call is dropped. The ‘conservative’ narrative out there ranges from using the leftist-spawned moniker for supporters - “birthers” in order to downplay the issue, to the extreme of outright condemnation. Don’t assume that all conservatives hesitate to discuss Obama’s constitutional eligibility as a way to avoid ending up on the wrong side of the issue, because as an explanation, it simply does not ring true. Evidence points elsewhere, towards a campaign of intimidation that is forcing conservative ‘talkers’ to pick their battles; which isolates the eligibility issue as not being worth the trouble it ignites.
In a recent round table discussion at Fox news, Ann Coulter labeled anyone concerned over Obama’s lack of natural born citizen status as a “crank” and further excoriated supporters in a vitriolic column. My advice to Governor Huckabee who also paid lip service to the eligibility slap down, is to do a little research next time beyond simply reading the Fox news memo banning further discussion. If he had, he would have learned that the initial case filed regarding Obama’s ineligible status was done so by Hillary Clinton supporter, Philip Berg. Once Clinton accepted the position as U.S. Secretary of State, Berg backed down. All I can say is that the pressure from above must really be something to shut Coulter down.
Don’t allow the narrative of intimidation and humiliation, preached by the sold-out media and their sycophantic co-conspirators, to influence you. The media can’t be trusted. We’ve already seen their cards. We now understand whose cause they champion and it’s not the cause of freedom. If you’ve closed your mind to this issue, based solely on a couple of isolated comments from people whose opinions you trust, consider doing your own investigation; and remember that the eligibility discussion bas been banned from the airwaves and many people who want to speak out have been forced into silence.
Enter stage right, a fearless defender of freedom, the attorney at the forefront of the eligibility issue, Dr. Orly Taitz, a.k.a. ‘Lady Liberty’. Back in March of 2009, Dr. Taitz undertook extraordinary measures just to have an opportunity to speak directly to Supreme Court Justice Roberts in order to advise him of apparent criminal sabotage inside the Supreme Court. Dr. Taitz departed her home at 3:00 am and drove to San Diego where she boarded a plane to Salt Lake City and picked up a second flight to Tacoma, Washington. From Tacoma, Dr. Taitz drove for a few more of hours to reach Moscow, Idaho to address Chief Justice Roberts during his appearance at the University.
During her hard-earned moment at the microphone, Dr. Taitz informed the Chief Justice and the audience that she had submitted her case, Lightfoot v Bowen, to Roberts who agreed to hear it in the conference of all nine justices on January 23, 2009. A court clerk, Danny Bickell refused to follow established procedures in handling this case and failed to forward an important supplemental brief. Additionally, the case was erased from the docket one day after Obama’s inauguration and two days before it was supposed to be heard in the conference. Outraged citizens called the Supreme Court and demanded that it be posted to the docket. This outrage was coupled with the fact that it was erased on the very day that Obama signed an executive order sealing all of his personal records. It begs the question what exactly is he hiding?
This is just the tip of the proverbial iceberg and that being said, why would anyone sacrifice their personal life, expose themselves to death threats, character assassination and survive having their automobile tampered with unless they were committed to truth, freedom and the defense of the Constitution? Dr. Taitz’ tireless, fearless pursuit of truth and justice is unparalleled in recent history. She is a true heroine and perhaps this is why she was listed at spot #6 on Obama’s hit list at Globe Magazine.
What’s at the center of this fight? Why is Dr. Taitz taking on the Obama regime? During the 2008 election not a single Secretary of State in the entire nation verified the status of then candidate, Barack Hussein Obama, as eligible according to the Constitution. This negligence at the highest level could be easily rectified by producing a birth certificate, but instead Obama has elected to spend nearly a million dollars so far, fighting legal challenges in court that question his eligibility. He’d rather fight than produce true evidence of his past; not the fictional version being sold in a bookstore near you.
The online appearance of a Hawaiian certificate of live birth attributed to Obama essentially states that he exists and lacks the vital information contained in an actual birth certificate. Furthermore, foreign born children can easily procure a certificate of live birth in the state of Hawaii without crucial information that can only be obtained from a hospital record. In addition, Obama’s father, a Kenyan, was a citizen of the United Kingdom at the time of Obama’s birth, as Kenya was a British Colony in 1961.
In 1866, John A. Bingham, chief framer of 14th amendment wrote: “every human being born within the United States of parents not owing allegiance to any foreign sovereignty is, in the language of the Constitution itself, a natural born citizen.”
According to Article 2, Section 1, Clause 5 of the United States Constitution, “No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.”
Notwithstanding the refusal to produce a true birth certificate that would settle the central issue of natural born citizenship, we are confronted with the results of an investigation regarding scores of social security numbers in connection to Obama including the most often used number attributed to a deceased Connecticut man. In addition, there have been indications of forgery associated with Obama’s selective service record. The answers to all of these mysteries remain sealed with Obama’s records.
Recently, attorney Gary Kreep grabbed hold of Dr. Taitz’ coattails as legal counsel for Dr. Wiley Drake and Markham Robinson. What grabbed my attention when reading the legal briefs of both Kreep and team Obama was that both teams insinuated in court that Dr. Taitz caused unreasonable delay due to a preoccupation with irrelevant matters. By irrelevant matters both Kreep and team Obama are referring to the constitutional matter of natural born citizenship. Whose team is Kreep playing for? If I were a writer in Hollyweird, I’d cast Kreep as a ‘plant’ as he does more to hinder an expedited resolution on the merits of this constitutionally critical case than actually move it along.
Then there’s the unsolved murder in connection with the improperly accessed passport information on presidential candidates Obama, Clinton and McCain. State Dept. employee Lt. Quarles Harris was cooperating with federal investigators at the time of his murder. He was found shot to death in his car in front of a D.C. church. (source: Washington Times) Some say that the violations of passport information regarding Clinton and McCain did nothing more than provide cover. Are people disappearing in connection with this case?
Signing on as an active duty military plaintiff in the eligibility lawsuit carries with it a unique risk of its own. Major Stefan Frederick Cook had his orders revoked after arguing that he should not be required to serve under a President who has failed to prove his eligibility for office. Following this legal action, the Department of Defense (DOD) compelled the termination of Major Cook from his job at Simtech Inc., a private company contracted by the Defense Security Services agency of the DOD.
In response, attorney for Major Cook, Orly Taitz, submitted this legal rebuttal: “A federal agency (such as the Department of Defense, acting through the Defense Security Services Agency) clearly violates the Whistleblower Protection Act if it takes or fails to take (or threatens to take or fail to take) a personnel action with respect to any employee or applicant because of any disclosure of information by the employee or applicant that he or she reasonably believes evidences a violation of a law, rule or regulation; gross mismanagement; gross waste of funds; an abuse of authority; or a substantial and specific danger to public health or safety.”
It suffices to say that regardless of the slippery defense tactics of the team Obama this will not go away! Our prayers go out to Lady Liberty and while you’re at it toss a few bucks in the jar at Dr. Taitz’ web-site to assist in bringing forward this case of paramount importance. Get on board and dismiss the distracting narrative pumped out by the media regarding the merits of this case.
Whatever the results are following the October 5th Santa Ana, CA hearing in Judge Carter’s court room, the question of Obama’s eligibility will remain unresolved until we are shown the documents currently sealed by his own executive order.
Ger your face out of the Kenyan’s lap for a change. What a novel idea that is.
Did you notice how one or two tried to taunt info out of me the other evening when I stated that an anomoly shows on the first exhibit the obama posted at his campaign website, and the anomoly shows int he second exhibit still on his website, but it is not on the imagery posted now at Factcheck.org, yet factcheck posted the first two exhibits and claimed they were genuine and the thing they now exhibit is the same as the images shown at barry’s wensite during the campaign? It really got under their snakey skin that I wouldn’t post the screen capture of the first exhibit and tell them what the anomoly is. They had to be satisfied witht he little black dot int he upper left quadrant. And anyone can follow that item by just clicking on the Israeli insider website. ... Lord forgive me, I sure enjoyed their frustration that evening.
LOL! They give themselves away when they do that. I love it that they don’t see any of the really good stuff, just enough on the open forum to mess with their minds.
Thanks for that tidbit of information.
Now, could you please cite the legislation that defines natural born citizen as you describe?
Congress has no authority to codify it. It is what it is and it ain't a natural-born British subject.
Why are you agitating for unConstitutional legislation?
That is self-evidently anti-American.
Art Bell is an Obama whore; he’s on your side.
And yet we have a president whose foreign father is a matter of public record and was sworn into office by the highest court in the land.
As you said, it is what it is.
Oh, so Art Bell believes that Obama was born in Hawaii?
*******
Most of the time, I respect and listen to people like tv hosts Hannity and Limbaugh, because they jump all over liar and fraud Obama when they get a chance.
1. Still, I consider them a coward when it comes to discussing this Obama eligibility issue.
2. They seem to back away from this Obama eligiblility issue as if it were the plague, and as if it were some hideous family secret that family members were not allowed to talk about for fear of getting a physical and verbal beating.
3. For instance, I hope that all these talk show hosts, like Dobbs and Hannity and Beck, won't suddenly take credit once this Obama birth certificate issue explodes in Obama's face when the 2012 presidential campaign comes around.
4. For instance, why can't these talk hosts show some courage and come right out and say something like this:
"Until Obama and Hawaii provides---voluntarily or involuntarily---the public with Obama's 1961 long form birth certificate, then I say that Obama was NOT born in Hawaii and that he is NOT eligible to be President. So, Obama, if you have a problem with that, go ahead and sue me in court, where you will have to finally show your Hawaii long form birth certificate in court."
5. Yes, I say that talk show people like Hannity, O'Reilly, Beck, and Limbaugh are cowards, because they shy away from the issue of Obama's birth Hawaii birth certificate and presidential eligibility instead of putting daily, continuous pressure on Obama and Hawaii to release Obama's long form birth certificate.
6. So again, I say this: I hope that when this Obama birth certificate issue explodes in Obama's face---especially during the 2012 presidential campaign---these cowardly talk show hosts like Hannity, O'Reilly, and Beck don't suddenly try to take credit for the explosion, because they absolutely would have had nothing to do with such an explosion.
7. What a bunch of wimps and self-centered cowards are talk show hosts like Hannity, O'Reilly, and Beck when it comes to this Obama Hawaii birth certificate issue.
Excellent article
It's in the article, the definition from the words of the Founding Father of the 14th Amendment:
"In 1866, John A. Bingham, chief framer of 14th amendment wrote: “every human being born within the United States of parents not owing allegiance to any foreign sovereignty is, in the language of the Constitution itself, a natural born citizen.”
Bingham's definition follows that to Vattel's and was employed by the Senate Resolution SR511.
Obama meets at best only one of the three requirements for natural born citizenship -- and the Senate and Congress and the courts know it -- but the fraud and the charade continues.
BTW -- Vattel's definition had an exception for those born abroad while their citizen parents were out of the country on the business of the nation [diplomats and military].
Oops, there are several cases that say otherwise. You have not been doing your research.
1. Still, I consider them cowards when it comes to discussing this Obama eligibility issue.
2. They seem to back away from this Obama eligibility issue as if it were the plague, and as if it were some hideous family secret that family members were not allowed to talk about for fear of getting a physical and verbal beating.
*******
If I was a famous tv or radio talk show host, I would try to put pressure on Obama and Hawaii officials to release Obama's long form birth certificate by putting up a sign like the following in my studio:
"Below this sign is the number of days that have gone by and still Obama has not released his long form Hawaii birth certificate:"
1. Then I would put up a new number each day between now and the Presidential election in Nov. 2012 until Obama and Hawaii officials finally release Obama's long form birth certificate.
2. For instance, if I started today---Oct. 7, 2009---Oct. 7 would be day one, and I would hang the number "1" somewhere in my studio.
3. Tomorrow, Oct. 8, would be number "2", and I would keep adding a new number each day until Obama and Hawaii officials released Obama's long form birth certificate.
4. I got the idea from David Letterman. Several years ago, David would put up calendars to see how many days would pass before some famous people finally visited his show.
I think one of those people was Oprah Winfrey.
5. My point is this:
If I were a famous tv and radio talk host like Hannity, Beck, and Dobbs, I would try to put tremendous pressure on Obama and Hawaii officials by putting up a calendar to see how long it was going to take for Obama and Hawaii officials to release Obama's 1961 long form birth certificate.
"Now, could you please cite the legislation that defines natural born citizen as you describe?""It's in the article, the definition from the words of the Founding Father of the 14th Amendment: "
"In 1866, John A. Bingham, chief framer of 14th amendment wrote: “every human being born within the United States of parents not owing allegiance to any foreign sovereignty is, in the language of the Constitution itself, a natural born citizen.”
"Bingham's definition follows that to Vattel's and was employed by the Senate Resolution SR511."
None of the three sources you cite are "legislation". They aren't law. And they don't say what you purport.
Bingham: This is a speech given by Bingham. Why would anyone think a speech is a better legal source than the text of the Ammendment itself? It carriers no legal weight. However, it also doesn't support your argument. All Bingham is talking about is the same exception written into the 14th itself. The 14th excepts those not "under the jurisdiction" of the United States. That exception is well established and means diplomats and invading soldiers.
Vattel: Vattel was a Swiss philosopher writing about the principles of "nations". He's not a legal authority and his book is not a legal cite. However, he also doesn't support your argument. Becuase he's not writing about English law in that passage. He's writing more generally and is talking about other countries. A couple of paragraphs down from that passage, he specifically points out how the rules in England are different, and being born on the soil is sufficient.
SR511: Is a non-binding resolution that did not create any definition. It simply acknowledged the facts of McCain's own birth and declared him to be a natural born citizen. By your reading, it would have the effect of declaring that a natural born citizen would have to share all the facts related there. That they would all have to have been born of parents out of the country on military duty. Obviously, that's absurd.
Hannity and Limbaugh aren’t birthers. Most Republicans aren’t.
Part of the ongoing problem is that an Hawaiian official has stated Barry Soetoro is a natural born citizen based upon the vital records that she claims to have seen which led her to that conclusion. But apparently the Hawaiian officials are breaking their own laws by not making available to the public the materials by which they have made this public proclamation.
Such is the state of this debacle, fraud and lies and sealed-from-the-public-view files are necessary to understand whether this man is actually a natural born citizen, and too many focal points are continuing to prevent the revelation of these data which the public is actually entitled to see!
We have a small army of obama slugs at FR taunting and insulting and spinning for the liar-in-chief, so maintaining the lies and secret files is apparently the strategy the obamanation has chosen, rather than openness. Oh, for sure, these pond-scum claim to care about the law, but in reality they are getting their amusement from spinning for the affirmative action liar, and have even admitted it several times. What does that tell us about these people that they take the time and make the claims of caring about the law, but they set out fromt he start to spin the Constitution to characterize it as impotent to define their chosen pres_ _ent?
When lies are the preferred defense of a pres_ _ent politician, the Republic is in mortal danger. And at FR they have a growing contingency working hard to maintain the lies and fraud. Why would a national media figure place their neck on a chopping block by having an ongoing counter blaring daily from their office, when even a conservative site like Freerepublic protects the liars and spinners working FR by characterizing them as doing a better job of arguing the issues? ... and surely you realize they are lying and dissembling, continually mischaracterizing to argue for their commie fascist pres_ _ent, yet they are protected.
It bound the Senators not to oppose McCain's electoral votes when they came before the Congress, and that is pretty binding.
SR511 disagrees with you. It incorporates Vattel's and Bingham's definition of "natural born citizen".
Once again I ask -- where is Obama's SR511????
Ann Coulter, Huckabee, Beck, O’Riley, Hannity, Greta, Rush, Levin, Schnitt and a whole bunch of other people, including SCOTUS would NOT have a gig, if they as so much as whispering the usurper’s BC or his ineligibility. Read the articles from Canada Free Press and listening to Dr. Laurie Roth to understand WHY!!!
..............Beck may be onto another Canada Free Press Story that they were working with North East Intelligence.
They have documents and testimony of Major News anchors from major Networks that were threatened by Obama Administration staff, NOT to bring up the BC or Natural Born Citizen issue.
Great interview in archives at Laurie Roth (3 hours long), but I highly recommend it. They state that they are storing documents in the US and copies in Canada, and maybe one other Country, if I remember correctly. The investigator is no amateur.
part 1
http://www.therothshow.com/demos/recent/hour1Aug0709.mp3
part 2
http://www.therothshow.com/demos/recent/hour2Aug0709.mp3
part 3
http://www.therothshow.com/demos/recent/hour3Aug0709.mp3
(and Northeast Intelligence intro and documentation at link below)
“4 August 2009: Do you remember Watergate? Thirty-five years ago this Sunday, U.S. President Richard M. Nixon submitted his letter of resignation for his role in the scandal. There was the crime - the break-in, and then there was the cover-up by the Nixon administration. There were threats, media manipulation and disinformation. It was the cover-up more than the crime itself in the aftermath of the Watergate break-in that led to the downfall of the Nixon administration. It was a politically critical time for our country, but we survived because of the strength of the U.S. constitution. “
http://homelandsecurityus.com/?p=2966
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.