Posted on 09/05/2009 10:01:00 PM PDT by euram
Looking for a quick and easy boost in the polls, President Obama has decided to go to the one place where merit bears no relationship to adulation: the United Nations. On September 24, the president will take the unprecedented step of presiding over a meeting of the UN Security Council.
No American president has ever attempted to acquire the image of King of the Universe by officiating at a meeting of the UN’s highest body. But Obama apparently believes that being flanked by council-member heads of state like Col. Moammar Qaddafi — who is expected to be seated five seats to Obama’s right — will cast a sufficiently blinding spell on the American taxpayer that the perilous state of the nation’s economy, the health-care fiasco, and a summer of “post-racial” scapegoating will pale by comparison.
(Excerpt) Read more at article.nationalreview.com ...
Good BYE Israel. Welcome the new state of Palestine. Obama will do this as he presides. Hillary immediatly resigns and announces challenging Obama in 2012
Many books have been written about an individual’s thirst for ultimate power. How many have been successful? Zero. And Zero will follow the same script.
Will Qaddafi give Obama a book to read and autograph it for him?
Such a result would be breathtaking — for the audacity of claiming exactly the opposite of what it really represents. Even allied council members France and the United Kingdom are reported to be very unhappy with Obama’s no-names strategy for his September rollout.
Far from bolstering his flagging image, the president’s group-hug theory of diplomacy deserves the disdain of anyone who can separate rhetoric from reality.
bump
ping people this should be in the news section!
Could you please put this on atleast front page news?
Thank-You
He’s desperate now. The dems hate the UN as much as we do. He will eventually alienate all.
bfl
He is a One-World Fascist, not a Communist or a Fascist... the worst of both worlds, as far as the US is concerned.Either we stipulate that the “whole world” is the “nation” for Dear Leader et al, to accurately describe their government philosophy, and state they are "ONE-WORLD FASCISTS", or we need a new word to describe their desired governmental system.
A word that would accurately synthesize their thinking is:
CommuFascist
bump to the top
He is a One-World Fascist, not a Communist or a Fascist... the worst of both worlds, as far as the US is concerned.Either we stipulate that the “whole world” is the “nation” for Dear Leader et al, to accurately describe their government philosophy, and state they are "ONE-WORLD FASCISTS", or we need a new word to describe their desired governmental system.
A word that would accurately synthesize their thinking is:
CommuFascist
You're right.
Dammit.
Thanks neverdem.
Barack Ozymandias
American Thinker | September 09, 2009 | J.R. Dunn
Posted on 09/08/2009 11:20:55 PM PDT by neverdem
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2335223/posts
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.