Posted on 08/03/2008 8:23:43 PM PDT by Free ThinkerNY
Foreword by TexasDarlin: Techdude’s latest report, written exclusively for the TexasDarlin blog, is mind-blowing. This report responds to critics; solves the “security border” mystery; AND exposes THE SMOKING GUN that will be conclusive in proving that the Certificate of Live Birth (COLB) proffered by Barack Obama on his official campaign website IS FAKE.
I am grateful to Techdude for his dedication to the truth, as I am to Polarik, Michele (who donated her COLB), Judah Benjamin, JimJ, the No Quarter team, and everyone who supports our efforts.
The only edit I’ve made to this report is to provide bolded headings for the reader’s benefit. The author’s previous report and professional credentials are at the end. He is the REAL DEAL. By Techdude
This follow up report, although it is more of an addendum, is about to reveal enough proof, beyond any doubt, that the KOS COLB is a digitally modified forgery and was based on another individual’s post-2006 COLB.
Since there were so many questions raised with the remnants of the previous border located on the KOS images I decided to focus this particular follow up on that specific issue. While mapping out over 100 individual scattered digital remnants and artifacts of the previous underlying COLB I also uncovered and restored the remnants and artifacts of the original COLB’s text.
For a quick preview – the original COLB used to create the KOS COLB image belongs to a female and does not belong to Obama. Another follow up report will reveal exactly who the original underlying COLB did belong to. Trust me when I tell you it is going to be one hell of a major twist that no one would have seen coming.
(Excerpt) Read more at texasdarlin.wordpress.com ...
No one, not one person with any credentials has been willing to say, under their name, that the proffered birth certificate is a phony.
Secondly, the Honolulu newspaper, the Advertiser, printed a notice of his birth the week of his birth, back in 1961. Unless they knew some 47 years ago that they were going to run a scam now, why would they have done that?
Finally, as stated numerous times, people with real credentials and millions of dollars to spend on opositional candidate investigations have looked at this a hundred times. Nothing.
It is a non-starter.
You can say what you like, but there’s not the slightest doubt in the world that Obama or his acolytes knowingly put a forgery up on his Fight The Smears web site. Let him slide his way out of that.
I have a feeling that he’s going to rue the day, if he doesn’t already, that web site was established.
That’s what I was thinking...could be wrong, I tried to raise a bio on her, but nothing...
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2008/jun/27/obamas-birth-certificate-part-ii/
‘“I guess the big issue that’s being raised is the lack of an embossed seal and a signature,” Okubo said, pointing out that in Hawaii, both those things are on the back of the document. “Because they scanned the front … you wouldn’t see those things.”
Okubo says she got a copy of her own birth certificate last year and it is identical to the Obama one we received.’
Meanwhile, the document is still up on:
http://my.barackobama.com/page/invite/birthcert
What named person, with any credentials, says it is a forgery?
No problem, I have done it myself a couple of times ;)
Its not a question of saying. The forgery has been demonstrated.
But if it was 1959 he was born in 1962, still a legal resident.
Why would she need a daughter that fits that age?
Bullshit. Name the certified experts in oppos research.
"As a heads up to the guilty parties – the names and dates have already been restored – as has the fact the owner is a female born in the 70’s. That is all that will be revealed publicly for now.
Janice Okubo is to old to have been born in the 70's so I was thinking maybe she had a daughter that age and supplied her birth certificate.
I did read the article and understand all you’ve quoted. Granted, all the imaging, scanning, pixel stuff is all over my head so I don’t comment on those issues. I just didn’t see the need for it to be a child of hers. I guess I’m not sure on the connections this woman has to Obama and what motivation she would have to participate with a fake COLB. It’s late.........I’m probably not making sense.
y’all might want to go back to texasdarling’s site and read the latest. Another individual has determined who the original COLB belongs to (hint = All in the Family... and I don’t mean Archie Bunker).
You are to far behind the information on the history of this andd the new information that has broke
well I’m a bit sleepy myself but is it Obama’s sisters’ COLB?
I mean half-sister (told ya I was sleepy)
KG // August 4, 2008 at 8:45 pmHoly crap. I’ve just duplicated the effort. It’s Maya’s - Maya Kassandra Soetoro. Her name fits perfectly in the artifacts.
So Techdude can check me, the “Y” in Maya comes down into the “D” of “Child’s Name” right into the middle of the top straight line part of the “D”, and penetrates the “D” by four pixels.
KG // August 4, 2008 at 11:07 pmFor those of you who want to do this for yourself:
1. Open BO’s COLB,
1A, Go through Techdude’s changes of hue and contrast. IIRC in the hue change I added a lot of red, and the contrast change - you want to turn the white background pixels nearly white. If you don’t do the hue and contrast changes things aren’t as easy to see, but you can still do this with the original image without these changes.
2. Using arial, 9 pt font, and selecting on the “C” in “Child’s Name”, type in “Maya Kassandra Soetoro”. Use five spaces between the names, like “MAYA SPACE SPACE SPACE SPACE SPACE KASSANDRA SPACE SPACE SPACE SPACE SPACE SOETORO”.
3. Zoom in close to the “M” in Maya, just above the “C”. You’ll see some pixel anomalies and you can move the text you just typed in to that point.
4. Now look how well that fits with both the left and right sides of the “M” and look how well it fits with the background pixels of the rest of the word Maya.
5. Now slide on over to “Kassandra”. Make sure you’ve used five spaces between the first, middle and last names. Look at the “K”. Both the vertical stem and the top diagonal stem of the letter and the “shadow” of pixels behind it. Vary your zoom between 600% to 1200%. You’ll see it. Somebody changed the background pixels around these letters.
6. Keep on looking at how the background pixels have been changed to match the letters that were removed.
7. Now ask yourself, is this just coincidence?
techdude // August 5, 2008 at 12:06 amCongrats KG
(I really wanted to play online all night but I am exhausted and will reply more in the AM)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.