No one, not one person with any credentials has been willing to say, under their name, that the proffered birth certificate is a phony.
Secondly, the Honolulu newspaper, the Advertiser, printed a notice of his birth the week of his birth, back in 1961. Unless they knew some 47 years ago that they were going to run a scam now, why would they have done that?
Finally, as stated numerous times, people with real credentials and millions of dollars to spend on opositional candidate investigations have looked at this a hundred times. Nothing.
It is a non-starter.
You can say what you like, but there’s not the slightest doubt in the world that Obama or his acolytes knowingly put a forgery up on his Fight The Smears web site. Let him slide his way out of that.
I have a feeling that he’s going to rue the day, if he doesn’t already, that web site was established.
Bullshit. Name the certified experts in oppos research.
That is a non-starter since no one is claiming that Obama was not "born" (lol), or was not born around that time. The issues being disputed many, such as "What was his name at the time of his birth"? If it was "Barry Dunham", why has he lied? You get stuck in a single-minded rut of your making.