Obama's Birth Announcement found in Newspaper

Texas Darlin Website ^ | July 22, 2008 | Texas Darlin

[Kevmo]

Obama was likely born in Hawaii — does that mean he’s Eligible? July 22, 2008 · 19 Comments

*The birth announcement was tracked down by Lori Starfelt, the producer of a documentary that PUMA is working on.

[Spunky]

I gotta stop reading these threads after 8:00 p.m. I swear when I clicked on the link you provided it showed that memo on this thread.

I must have been LOL!

[2CAVTrooper]

“Congress had, of course, to make the stipulation because there was a serious question as to whether the zone was actually U.S. territory in the normal sense. Also, it only made this stipulation in 1937, that was after McCain was born thus making his claim to fully qualify under this stipulation somewhat cloudy.”

There is nothing cloudy about it because congress already dealt with the issue back in 1790.

RE: Act of March 26, 1790, AKA Naturalization Act of 1790

[butterdezillion]

BVW, did Starfelt say she had an actual newspaper clipping, or was it a photocopy of a newspaper from microfilm? It’s quite important. Since TD’s blog is down the only way I can find out what was actually said at the time is through references elsewhere.

[bvw]

I’m looking.

Meanwhile: Here’s a second woman’s submission, which is a clipping. “Koa” claimed to a be a Hawaiian and she mentioned that she had her own clipping from that Date see:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2040486/posts?page=5066#5066

[bvw]

I remember that Lori Starfelt she said she found it on microfilm (or maybe microfiche), because I remember thinking that if one microfilm existed there were probably more, and that the scratches and cracks on different microfilms vary are serve as unique ids of that microfilm and give a clue as to age.

Everytime a microfilm or fiche is used, a few more scratches are added. Cracks at the edges and feedholes develop with age, and depend on storage conditions and how aggressively a microfilm was used or rewound.

The first mention of the the find on the long thread was on 7/22 and is at http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2040486/posts?page=3866#3866

And as a separate thread at http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2049721/posts?page=1

That happened around the same time as a document examiner ‘TechDude’ went black — went quiet — after making allegations that the COLB was a forgery on the basis of his image analysis. The last thing TechDude claimed was startling — that he was able to recover the name of the person whose original Hawaiian COLB was used for the forgery. As I remember he claimed it was “Maya Soetoro”.

Freeper Polarik had first made the claim that the COLB was forged based on his experiments and analysis, but Polarik was not considered to be a document expert. While the public identity of TechDude was never revealed (it was guessed at), his analysis was provided through Pam Geller at Atlas Shrugged blog and Texas Darlin at TD Blog, and those two bloggers claimed that he was a legitimate forensic document examiner.

No one else seems to have been able to duplicate that feat — and such a feat should have been able to be duplicated by any earnest and able computer image editing user.

I mention all that because sequence of events, reviewed long term, can give a sense of what was real and what was misdirection.

[bvw]

By ‘feat’ I mean the discovery of a residue of “Maya Soetoro” on the COLB.