Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/03/2007 8:46:28 AM PDT by CharlesS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last
To: CharlesS

So the problem with the religious right is that you disagree with their religious views and don’t think they should voice them in the public square...


2 posted on 05/03/2007 8:48:52 AM PDT by Unam Sanctam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CharlesS
They are commonly referred to as the religious right...

Which includes pretty much anyone the libtards disagree with on any subject related to religion or not..
3 posted on 05/03/2007 8:50:35 AM PDT by cripplecreek (Greed is NOT a conservative ideal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CharlesS
The Religious Right

As opposed to the atheist left?

4 posted on 05/03/2007 8:50:43 AM PDT by Puppage (You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CharlesS

I get it. Your problem isn’t that the religious right has their own views, you just don’t like it when they act in accordance with those views or desire to have the freedom to do so.


5 posted on 05/03/2007 8:52:32 AM PDT by JamesP81 (Eph 6:12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CharlesS

BTTT


6 posted on 05/03/2007 8:52:49 AM PDT by Chena (Why settle for less when you could have the best! Fred Thompson for President!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CharlesS

No comment.

Is that better?


7 posted on 05/03/2007 8:54:32 AM PDT by LikeLight (tagline expired - do you wish to renew?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CharlesS
Read more at constitutionallyright.com ...

No thanks. Nothing really prevents you from posting it here.

8 posted on 05/03/2007 8:54:55 AM PDT by newgeezer (Just my opinion, of course. Your mileage may vary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CharlesS

This guy is behind the times in political correctness speech. Everyone is ‘right’ in their religious belief, thus the former ‘religious right’ is now more commonly known as the ‘morals voters’....


9 posted on 05/03/2007 8:55:07 AM PDT by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CharlesS
The bill in question has nothing to do with hospitals supplying emergency contraception to every individual who comes in off the streets. This bill is specifically geared to provide emergency contraception to rape victims! The idea is, if a woman is raped, the hospital will be required to have the “Plan B” pill on hand, which can lower the risk of pregnancy by up to 89 percent.

Or so it does not matter if the Hospital objects on moral principles. The government can force hospitals to assist in killing of a conceived child. Doesn't seem to be very much of a "Constitutionally Right" position to me, criminalizing religious positions. As if it being raped makes a difference. The rape position is just to get the foot in the door so they can make it a general policy like several other states have done.

10 posted on 05/03/2007 8:57:01 AM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CharlesS

I believe I heard Geraldo say something about the religious right on Bill O’s show last night.

Geraldo said that the reason the Republicans are a minority party is because of the religious right and the way it pushes its views on abortion.

At least that’s what I think I heard. Can anyone help?


13 posted on 05/03/2007 8:58:24 AM PDT by Loyal Buckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CharlesS

Gee...I guess George Washington and Abraham Lincoln wouldn’t fit into the straight jacket of banned religious expression that you would have Christians wear today.
When a political party decides that God doesn’t fit into its platform, that’s the time Christians should disassociate themselves from that godless bunch.


17 posted on 05/03/2007 9:09:06 AM PDT by kittymyrib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CharlesS

IBTZ?


21 posted on 05/03/2007 9:12:52 AM PDT by Kevmo (Duncan Hunter just needs one Rudy G Campaign Video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RVBtPIrEleM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CharlesS

My Troll Alarm Just Went Off

..newbie, why don't you lurk for a while before you give in to the urge to post your anti-religion stuff...

22 posted on 05/03/2007 9:27:40 AM PDT by WalterSkinner ( ..when there is any conflict between God and Caesar -- guess who loses?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CharlesS
On the right, we Conservatives have our own villains which supply ammunition to the enemy. They are commonly referred to as the religious right...

Lies followed by leftist bigotry. How nice.

24 posted on 05/03/2007 9:39:55 AM PDT by EternalVigilance ("A [Free] Republic, if you can keep it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CharlesS

I bit, and gave you a hit. Your blog is pathetic. I know eight years olds who could do better in a technical sense. Your content is lame and ignorant. And, you don’t even know how to spell, much less use spell-check.

I give it a minus two on a scale of one to ten.


25 posted on 05/03/2007 9:43:14 AM PDT by EternalVigilance ("A [Free] Republic, if you can keep it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CharlesS
This bill is specifically geared to provide emergency contraception to rape victims!

They spewed the same crap about abortion, assuring us it would NEVER be used as a "contraceptive gone bad" measure. They lie.

How about some statistics?

The adult pregnancy rate associated with rape is estimated to be 4.7%.
AMERICAN RAPE STATISTICS

This bill is only for 4.7% of the population? How many of them do you think go to a Catholic hospital? You REALLY expect someone to buy that idea? And you want to ignore the First Amendment (Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;) in order to unConstitutionally hog tie a group that you dislike. Remember that when you deny others their Constitutional rights, yours are next.

26 posted on 05/03/2007 9:55:39 AM PDT by DJ MacWoW (If you think you know what's coming next....You don't know Jack.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CharlesS

American Facists: The Christian Right and The War on America Chris Hedges...

I am trying to read this but it’s so full of BS...

Here’s a Sample Review...

The Christian Right, like these early fascist movements, does not openly call for dictatorship, nor does it use
physical violence to suppress opposition. In short, the movement is not yet revolutionary. But the ideological architecture of a Christian fascism is being cemented in place. The movement has roused its followers to a fever pitch of despair and fury. All it will take, Hedges writes, is one more national crisis on the order of September 11 for the Christian Right to make a concerted drive to destroy American democracy. The movement awaits a crisis. At that moment they will reveal themselves for what they truly are — the American heirs to fascism. Hedges issues a potent, impassioned warning. We face an imminent threat. His book reminds us of the dangers liberal, democratic societies face when they tolerate the intolerant.”


27 posted on 05/03/2007 9:59:38 AM PDT by griswold3 (Don't 'Bob Dole' me in 2008!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CharlesS

Explain, please, why I should increase the hit count to your personal web blog when you’re the author of the piece and can post your article in its entirety here on FR.


32 posted on 05/03/2007 2:59:52 PM PDT by Sally'sConcerns (http://www.fda.gov/emaillist.html - Class I (life threatening) recalls email alert sign-up)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CharlesS

No fair trying to get hits to your blog!!!

Calm down now! You might get a little dizzy running in so many circles.

Hmmm, I'm pondering whether you might need to meet the following inhabitant of my abode...

Whatcha think?

Well, do ya feel lucky? Do ya?

33 posted on 05/03/2007 3:07:29 PM PDT by Sally'sConcerns (http://www.fda.gov/emaillist.html - Class I (life threatening) recalls email alert sign-up)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CharlesS
Here we go again; an excellent example of whet I refer to as a "lack of logical continuity". The author tells us all that the Religious Right is over reacting in taking the stance that Catholic hospitals should not be legally forced to provide the "morning after pill" to rape victims; that they are going too far.

Oh, those mean and evil Christian extremists! Next they will want women wearing burkas!

Never mind the consistent church position that life begins at conception. Never mind that this pill in an abortafacient - the embryo, although conceived, is prevented from attaching to the uterine wall, and/or everything, lining and all, is expelled. Never mind that, logically, this is no different than an abortion, except that it is immediate and is accomplished with drugs rather that instruments.

The author claims the church goes too far, but completely fails to recognize that there is no other logical position for it to take. The author indicates he is an agnostic. I quite agree – some of the root meanings of that work fit him nicely:

”a”-the nullification of the rest of the word, and “gnostic”- one meaning is to “know”, as in: “to be aware of the truth or factuality of : be convinced or certain of b : to have a practical understanding of”.

So then, the author confesses he is missing practical understanding. I agree.

34 posted on 05/03/2007 3:30:08 PM PDT by 70times7 (Sense... some don't make any, some don't have any - or so the former would appear to the latter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson