Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Condi To Replace Cheney?
Conservative Trailhead ^ | 02/19/2005 | Henry Ortuno

Posted on 02/19/2005 4:29:39 AM PST by Read2Know

Beltway rumors are not to be taken too seriously. The one circulating now has SecState Condi Rice replacing VP Dick Cheney next year due to Cheney's bum ticker.

This of course would be a calculated political manuver to position Ms. Rice to have a clear run at the presidency.

Republicans and conservatives so fear the potential of a celebrity vote sweeping Hillary Clinton into office that they are desperate to do something. They think a black conservative female is the only political trump card that can beat former First Lady Clinton.

Current polls make Republicans nervous:

A CNN-USA Today-Gallup poll last week found that 40 percent of the Democrats polled said they would be most likely to support Clinton for president, 25 percent said they favored Sen. John Kerry and 18 percent said former Sen. John Edwards.

This celebrity phenomena cancels any logical thinking by the voters.(See California recall race, 2004).

This may not be such a bad move for the Republicans if they want to retain the White House in 2008.


TOPICS: Politics
KEYWORDS: cheney; clinton; rice; rumor
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last
To: SketchMD

The Vice-President is elected along with the President (see Article II, Section 1, Clause 1). The President can not fire the Vice-President. Cheney will be the one to decide if Cheney resigns.


21 posted on 02/19/2005 12:10:21 PM PST by Repeal 16-17 (When Are The Liberals Going To Move To Canada?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: KJC1
**Just speaking for myself, I'm getting REALLY tired of rumors about VP Cheney being replaced.

I think it's just people trying to upset the applecart to make the team seem weak, and exploiting his heart condition to do so.

Viva Cheney!**

I agree IMHO Cheney is not going anywhere until January 2009 and it irritates and annoys me that they immediately bang on about his heart condition when it is suggested he should be replaced but when he dresses up warm in Poland all they do is criticize what he wore with no mention of his heart condition.

The media as usual are not consistent especially where Cheney is concerned they cut him no slack because basically they are left wing and they want Cheney out of the way they still fear him.
22 posted on 02/19/2005 12:41:35 PM PST by snugs (An English Cheney Chick - BIG TIME)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SketchMD
I don't agree that Bush is not a stagiest but I do agree he is loyal and that is a very good reason why Cheney will remain. The other reason is that IMHO Bush believes he is the best man for the job and also the working and personal relationship between the 2 men Cheney ain't going anywhere until 2009 when he will go and find those streams and rivers that he has yet to fish and explore.
23 posted on 02/19/2005 12:46:45 PM PST by snugs (An English Cheney Chick - BIG TIME)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Repeal 16-17

I thought that was the case but being English I was not certain.


24 posted on 02/19/2005 12:48:04 PM PST by snugs (An English Cheney Chick - BIG TIME)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: snugs

I think Cheney stays. If he has to leave, I guess I would prefer that someone who is really out front with his or her Christian values would take his place. I like Condi a lot, but I don't think she fits the bill.


25 posted on 02/19/2005 1:01:59 PM PST by rockiepayne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: need_a_screen_name

All the more reason for the President to play his cards close to his vest, need_a_sceen_name.

Democrats haven't an original thought in their collective heads regarding anything right now. The need for thr President to say something. So they may ridicule it, while using that very information as the center of their strategy.

President Bush is playing a very clever and effective "Texas Hold 'Em" or "Rope A Dope" strategery with the Dems. Knowing that sooner or later, they have to say or do something (Besides raising taxes) that people will buy in on.

Jack.


26 posted on 02/19/2005 2:07:52 PM PST by Jack Deth (Knight Errant and Disemboweler of the WFTD Thread)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: livius

"Everyone keeps talking about Hillary's stance on illegal immigration. What is it?"

"Her way of putting a "stop" to it would be exactly like her husband's: declare them all legal. That takes care of that "illegal" part."

Exactly true. Hillary's supposed anti-illegal immigration stance was mere playing to the camera and gullible media types-- in case it hasn't been noticed, she simultaneously dances with all the pro-immigration ethnic organizations that give mucho dinero to the Dems *and* has refused to do anything concrete in her status as a legislator unlike eg Tancredo. She has no intention of doing anything to combat illegal immigration, nor any intention of reducing the unsustainably high (more than a million/year) legal immigration levels we have from chain migration. Anyone who trusts a word she says is hopelessly gullible.


27 posted on 02/19/2005 3:26:16 PM PST by surfette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Read2Know

"Speaking of Hillary, I just saw a 5 second clip on CBS of her face while being interviewed. CBS used a camera filter to "soften" her features. You know, the type that make people look slightly smudgy. The MSM wants her in 2008. Make no mistake about that."

Thankfully the MSM no longer has a monopoly on information in the USA anymore. The blogs are now in control and most strongly reflect the opinion of the grass roots. And as you can see from the Dem blogs, they don't like Hillary within their own party-- it's bloodsport there.


28 posted on 02/19/2005 3:28:34 PM PST by surfette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Read2Know

'"Viva Cheney!"

I agree. Cheney has served this nation all his life and we're fortunate to have had him serve in that respect.
However, he has said he isn't running in 2008. That leaves a vacuum. A vacuum Hillary is aiming to fill. Hillary is a hardcore socialist. Not someone who should occupy the White House.'

Frist would beat the stuffings out of her for the WH in 2008. Hillary is wildly unpopular, even among her own party's most avid.


29 posted on 02/19/2005 3:31:09 PM PST by surfette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Read2Know

Jeez! If these people knew how HARD it is to get a really good Secretary of State confirmed, they wouldn't be talking this way. I say, let Condi get herself some really good credentials built up at the State Department, and just take it from there in 2008.


30 posted on 02/21/2005 5:11:34 AM PST by alloysteel ("Master of the painfully obvious.....")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson