Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Evolution Disclaimer Supported
The Advocate (Baton Rouge) ^ | 12/11/02 | WILL SENTELL

Posted on 12/11/2002 6:28:08 AM PST by A2J

By WILL SENTELL

wsentell@theadvocate.com

Capitol news bureau

High school biology textbooks would include a disclaimer that evolution is only a theory under a change approved Tuesday by a committee of the state's top school board.

If the disclaimer wins final approval, it would apparently make Louisiana just the second state in the nation with such a provision. The other is Alabama, which is the model for the disclaimer backers want in Louisiana.

Alabama approved its policy six or seven years ago after extensive controversy that included questions over the religious overtones of the issue.

The change approved Tuesday requires Louisiana education officials to check on details for getting publishers to add the disclaimer to biology textbooks.

It won approval in the board's Student and School Standards/ Instruction Committee after a sometimes contentious session.

"I don't believe I evolved from some primate," said Jim Stafford, a board member from Monroe. Stafford said evolution should be offered as a theory, not fact.

Whether the proposal will win approval by the full state Board of Elementary and Secondary Education on Thursday is unclear.

Paul Pastorek of New Orleans, president of the board, said he will oppose the addition.

"I am not prepared to go back to the Dark Ages," Pastorek said.

"I don't think state boards should dictate editorial content of school textbooks," he said. "We shouldn't be involved with that."

Donna Contois of Metairie, chairwoman of the committee that approved the change, said afterward she could not say whether it will win approval by the full board.

The disclaimer under consideration says the theory of evolution "still leaves many unanswered questions about the origin of life.

"Study hard and keep an open mind," it says. "Someday you may contribute to the theories of how living things appeared on earth."

Backers say the addition would be inserted in the front of biology textbooks used by students in grades 9-12, possibly next fall.

The issue surfaced when a committee of the board prepared to approve dozens of textbooks used by both public and nonpublic schools. The list was recommended by a separate panel that reviews textbooks every seven years.

A handful of citizens, one armed with a copy of Charles Darwin's "Origin of the Species," complained that biology textbooks used now are one-sided in promoting evolution uncritically and are riddled with factual errors.

"If we give them all the facts to make up their mind, we have educated them," Darrell White of Baton Rouge said of students. "Otherwise we have indoctrinated them."

Darwin wrote that individuals with certain characteristics enjoy an edge over their peers and life forms developed gradually millions of years ago.

Backers bristled at suggestions that they favor the teaching of creationism, which says that life began about 6,000 years ago in a process described in the Bible's Book of Genesis.

White said he is the father of seven children, including a 10th-grader at a public high school in Baton Rouge.

He said he reviewed 21 science textbooks for use by middle and high school students. White called Darwin's book "racist and sexist" and said students are entitled to know more about controversy that swirls around the theory.

"If nothing else, put a disclaimer in the front of the textbooks," White said.

John Oller Jr., a professor at the University of Louisiana-Lafayette, also criticized the accuracy of science textbooks under review. Oller said he was appearing on behalf of the Louisiana Family Forum, a Christian lobbying group.

Oller said the state should force publishers to offer alternatives, correct mistakes in textbooks and fill in gaps in science teachings. "We are talking about major falsehoods that should be addressed," he said.

Linda Johnson of Plaquemine, a member of the board, said she supports the change. Johnson said the new message of evolution "will encourage students to go after the facts."


TOPICS: Heated Discussion
KEYWORDS: crevolist; evolution; rades
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 3,181-3,2003,201-3,2203,221-3,240 ... 7,021-7,032 next last
To: exmarine
Poor exmarine, clueless, totally clueless.

Ah, be it so fanatical.

Oh, and by the way, You ARE NEVER an Ex Marine, once you are one, you are one for life.

How about we call you, US Marine, or retired marine, but NOT ex.

PH, Physicist, etc, did you get that last one?

In fact, God is a better and more logical answer than "chance" or "natural selection + random mutation".

I guess we have been wasting all that time and research, and discovered all those many things using that theory of evolution in biology, molecular structure, DNA etc, and look it how wrong we were. I guess Exmarine has the WHOLE answer.

GODDIDIT!!!

We're done, don't need to study anything anymore, if we don't understand something, that's OK, you know why?

GODDIDIT!!!

We can all go home now....
3,201 posted on 01/06/2003 12:00:26 PM PST by Aric2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3184 | View Replies]

To: f.Christian
"Credo in at most unum deum,"-PDQ Bach
3,202 posted on 01/06/2003 12:02:04 PM PST by Doctor Stochastic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3195 | View Replies]

To: exmarine
Your conclusions simply do not follow from your premises. I am worth much more than a rock to myself, while you aren't worth even that.

It's really very simple. My life and the lives of my loved ones have value to me and meaning for me. My place in a livable society, and the responsibility to maintain and improve it for them, yields the same valuable result for you and yours. It's an vast series of economic transactions of convenience for the "good" of each of us resulting in the "good life" for all of us.

No overarching morality needed, no beyond-the-grave coercion needed, no gods needed. Don't think so? Then let the oil, electricity, clean water, and food distribution networks break down and see what happens to our wonderful little civilization and all our loving, considerate, god-fearing, moral people.

3,203 posted on 01/06/2003 12:03:30 PM PST by balrog666
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3191 | View Replies]

To: f.Christian
Is it possible there could be more than one Creator God?

Well, Elohiem is plural.

3,204 posted on 01/06/2003 12:03:49 PM PST by js1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3195 | View Replies]

To: js1138
Thank you for your post!

If I said anything that sounded Kantian to you, it was entirely accidental.

You cannot arbitrarily decalre God to be immune from the problem of existence simply by declaring Him outside of space and time.

There was nothing arbitrary in my statement. Any intellectual being existing solely within space/time (including physical laws, geometry, etc.) --- cannot be God for the very reason that Physicist gave in explaining why there is no "before" the big bang, i.e. no "south" of the South Pole. If the being only exists "in" space/time, the being cannot be "before" space/time.

The universe can also be seen as outside of space and time.

I am not aware of any Cosmology, Astronomy or Physics which allows this universe to exist except as space/time, e.g. the inflationary model. Space/time is created as the universe expands.

3,205 posted on 01/06/2003 12:04:12 PM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3192 | View Replies]

To: Physicist
" . . . Pee Wee Herman's voice."

Whatever bakes your cake.

3,206 posted on 01/06/2003 12:07:51 PM PST by Fester Chugabrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3193 | View Replies]

To: Junior
placemarker
3,207 posted on 01/06/2003 12:08:06 PM PST by Junior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3205 | View Replies]

To: Doctor Stochastic
I do speak altar boy latin . . . fluently - - - one of my early disgraces // failures!
3,208 posted on 01/06/2003 12:08:28 PM PST by f.Christian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3202 | View Replies]

To: balrog666
Your conclusions simply do not follow from your premises. I am worth much more than a rock to myself, while you aren't worth even that. It's really very simple. My life and the lives of my loved ones have value to me and meaning for me. My place in a livable society, and the responsibility to maintain and improve it for them, yields the same valuable result for you and yours. It's an vast series of economic transactions of convenience for the "good" of each of us resulting in the "good life" for all of us.

You simply can't see the folly of your position can you? Yes, your loved ones have value "to you," another meaningless rock, but they do not have intrinsic objective value. They can't possibly. They have meaning to you, but the meaning you feel for them is just a meaningless chemical process in your materialistic brain. Next time you grieve for a lost loved one, might I suggest that you remember that the grief you feel is a mere chemical process on your brain....see if that will provide you with any comfort in your time of loss (I mean that respectfully). Under materialism, nothing can have value, yet you assign it value anyway. That is precisely the hopeless dichotomy I was talking about.

3,209 posted on 01/06/2003 12:08:31 PM PST by exmarine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3203 | View Replies]

To: Alamo-Girl
I can't spell. I was thinking of this Georg Cantor
3,210 posted on 01/06/2003 12:08:45 PM PST by js1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3205 | View Replies]

To: js1138
Plural . . . the Creator has parts - - - specialities!
3,211 posted on 01/06/2003 12:10:05 PM PST by f.Christian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3204 | View Replies]

To: f.Christian
You were an altar boy? So was I -- until I got too big to wear the cassock...
3,212 posted on 01/06/2003 12:13:03 PM PST by Junior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3208 | View Replies]

To: exmarine
That is precisely the hopeless dichotomy I was talking about.

Once again, you fail to see or understand any viewpoint but your own. So, why even discuss it?

3,213 posted on 01/06/2003 12:14:03 PM PST by balrog666
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3209 | View Replies]

To: exmarine
I see, so Balrog of course cannot be religious in any way shape or form because he chooses to understand the scientific value and pursuit of evolution.

I get it now, if you believe in evolution you are an atheist/communist/materialist etc etc ad nauseum.

If you believe that evolution is the best scientific explanation for what we are today, you must believe that god does NOT exist, and that NO one has a soul, that everyone is just a piece of the celestial rock that happens to think.

Get a clue Exmarine, get a clue.
3,214 posted on 01/06/2003 12:14:25 PM PST by Aric2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3209 | View Replies]

To: Alamo-Girl
If we agree that the universe IS space/time, then there is no point in asking how it was created. It is the same question as asking how God was created. If there is no time outside the existence of the universe, then there is no BEFORE the universe and no reason to attempt to explain its existence. Same goes for
God. There is no rational reason to separate the universe and
God, certainly no evidence.
3,215 posted on 01/06/2003 12:14:31 PM PST by js1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3205 | View Replies]

To: balrog666
Then let the oil, electricity, clean water, and food distribution networks break down and see what happens to our wonderful little civilization and all our loving, considerate, god-fearing, moral people.

First, what people is done because people are basically evil. Who said our people were God-fearing? We live in a nation far removed from the God-fearing nation it was in the 1600s. That being said, it is first and foremost Christians who feed the starving, hurting people worldwide today. Who is the first in after an earthquake or hurricane - Christian organizations. See any muslims or hindus doing this worldwide? Not on your life. In fact, it was Christians who opened the first hospitals and orphanages in the West, and it was the Puritans who introduced universal education for children.

On the other hand, what has atheism contributed to the world - Stalin, Mao, hundreds of millions of dead in this century alone. Atheism produces only ugliness becuase it is empty and devoid of any values. Human beings have no worth if they come from rocks.

3,216 posted on 01/06/2003 12:16:49 PM PST by exmarine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3203 | View Replies]

To: Aric2000
I get it now, if you believe in evolution you are an atheist/communist/materialist etc etc ad nauseum.

Stop assigning things to me I didn't say. It was true in his case. Is it true in yours? There are people who claim to believe in God and evolution - they are the saddest case of all.

If you believe that evolution is the best scientific explanation for what we are today, you must believe that god does NOT exist, and that NO one has a soul, that everyone is just a piece of the celestial rock that happens to think.

It seems you are now less dogmatic about evolution. Now, you say you believe in it. Tell me, where do human beings get their value? hmmm? Do they have value? If they do, where does that value come from? Certainly not from evolutionary theory! Where?

3,217 posted on 01/06/2003 12:20:33 PM PST by exmarine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3214 | View Replies]

To: Aric2000
Questions for you to ponder: Can you explain in terms of evolutionary theory how: Consciousness came from unconsciousness; personality came from non-personality?
3,218 posted on 01/06/2003 12:23:03 PM PST by exmarine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3214 | View Replies]

To: balrog666
Balrog666,

Don't you get it? Since you believe in the science of evolution, you must be an atheist/communist/materialist.

Life is nothing but an accident, therefore it must mean nothing to you, but since he is a christian and has morals and cannot in good faith believe in such things as evolution because it goes against his belief in creationism, he is a good moral person and believes in the sanctity of life, but you can't, because you believe in evolution.

You are such a terrible human being!! How dare you believe in evolution!! You immoral, athiestic communist materialist!!

Don't you know? GODDIDIT

That IS the answer.

You know that bacteria that has become immune to antibiotics? THat's NOT eveolution.

GODDIDIT

You know all those fossils in the ground? Those aren't real? The tree of evolution is NOT there, GODDIDIT to fool us mortal men and take them away from his grace.

Didn't you know that?

Ok, I am taking off my tinfoil beannie now.

Sorry, I just couldn't help myself!! ;)
3,219 posted on 01/06/2003 12:23:22 PM PST by Aric2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3203 | View Replies]

To: exmarine
We live in a nation far removed from the God-fearing nation it was in the 1600s.

Thank God for that. Do you wish to bring back the Cristian Taliban?

3,220 posted on 01/06/2003 12:24:32 PM PST by js1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3216 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 3,181-3,2003,201-3,2203,221-3,240 ... 7,021-7,032 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson