Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

OK, Donald, we get it. You’re an expert on bimbos!!! After all, you married three of ’em….
one man's opinion...

Posted on 01/28/2016 12:59:57 PM PST by ken5050

Trump continues to display a galloping megalomania, a petty, vindictive, nature, and above all, a complete, total, and utter unfitness to be President of the United States.

Unable to let the slightest perceived insult escape his attention, Trump, the other day, resumed his "war" with Megyn Kelly by deciding to opt out of tonight's FOX NEWS debate. OK, while many think it's a very dumb move, and could hurt his campaign, some feel it's a brilliant stroke. We shall see.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: 1stcanadiansenator; bimbo; kelly; kickingthemound; nation; vanitytds; whore
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-205 next last
To: ken5050
You miss the obvious.

If he does that billboard stunt, it'll be a Trump landslide.

Hint:

I mean, how are Sanders and Hillary going to compete?

181 posted on 01/28/2016 8:30:24 PM PST by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: beandog
We’ll we know that Trump didn’t marry his wives for their brains.

Few men do.

Women marry up.

182 posted on 01/28/2016 8:42:58 PM PST by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick
It never occurred to me that anyone would think that of the women of Free Republic. I want it on record that I never had the slightest desire to appear naked live in public, in photos, in paintings, drawings, or sculpture.

Whoops, that must be the sound of The Donald tearing up your phone number.

Just kidding...I know you are married with a lot o tax-chickadees... ;-)

183 posted on 01/28/2016 9:02:58 PM PST by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: CodeToad
That "we should both see other men" pic *never* grows old. My wife giggles when she sees it.
184 posted on 01/28/2016 9:04:06 PM PST by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: catfish1957
She has has now converted to Fiorina....(yuk)

Snarly Fiorina, on a thread about women and public nudity.

I think I just threw up in my mouth a little. (OK, a *lot*.)

...as for ole' Snarly -- when she was CEO, she was the one who said, "No American has a right to a job."

185 posted on 01/28/2016 9:06:15 PM PST by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick
Mrs. Trump would be the Carla Bruni of the United States.

Hi again, Tax-chick.

My later post wasn't plagiarism: I posted mine before I read this post of yours.

Great minds think alike: so consider this a hat tip.

186 posted on 01/28/2016 9:07:49 PM PST by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: trisham
Imho, Kelly probably advanced her career in ways that don't involve intelligence.

Given that they likely involved someone else's head, if the rumors be true,...

you're probably right.

187 posted on 01/28/2016 9:11:57 PM PST by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies]

To: flaglady47

Which would give Donald (or anyone else) reason to think she might be available.


188 posted on 01/28/2016 10:58:22 PM PST by TBP (Obama lies, Granny dies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers
Great minds think alike: so consider this a hat tip.

Accepted! For the record, I don't think being a nude model means Mrs. Trump (or any other) is a bad person. She's just a person whose standards of appropriateness are different from mine. The same with Ms. Kelly: I don't wear what she considers appropriate, either - not even as a nightgown.

The more things change, the more they stay the same. Mrs. Andrew Jackson was attacked as an adulteress and Mrs. James K. Polk as a high-fashion bimbo. To quote Mark Steyn, who has been playing around with his idiom lately, "Politics ain't beanbag."

189 posted on 01/29/2016 2:24:07 AM PST by Tax-chick ("This is all going to end very badly." ~ Victor Davis Hanson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver
Not really.

One divorce is acceptable but two makes you unfit?

How about they are only married once but have a mistress?

A string of mistresses?

How about never being married at all?

Is fornication before marriage acceptable as long as they get married after?

How about if they don't but don't have a child?

How about if they don't and do have a child?

You can find presidents who have done all of this and more.

190 posted on 01/29/2016 8:00:05 AM PST by Harmless Teddy Bear (Proud Infidel, Gun Nut, Religious Fanatic and Freedom Fiend)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies]

To: Harmless Teddy Bear

Reminds me of the righteous Christian Brits who hated Winston Churchill because he smoked cigars, drank whiskey, and used occasional profanity. We need an Alpha male more than ever.


191 posted on 01/29/2016 8:02:27 AM PST by AuntB (Illegal immigration is simply more "share the wealth" socialism and a CRIME not a race!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies]

To: Harmless Teddy Bear

Are morals important?

Is commitment to the family important?

Do you think being divorced twice and married three times is a good thing?


192 posted on 01/29/2016 8:08:07 AM PST by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver
Answer my questions first and I will answer yours.
193 posted on 01/29/2016 8:14:41 AM PST by Harmless Teddy Bear (Proud Infidel, Gun Nut, Religious Fanatic and Freedom Fiend)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies]

To: Harmless Teddy Bear

” One divorce is acceptable but two makes you unfit?”

One is bad, two is a trend.

“How about they are only married once but have a mistress?”

bad

“A string of mistresses?”

Deplorable

“How about never being married at all?”

Depends, but generally shows they are poorly adjusted individuals.

“Is fornication before marriage acceptable as long as they get married after?”

Its a sin right?

“How about if they don’t but don’t have a child?”

huh

Multiple divorces is an important tell for any individual. It shows poor judgement or significant personality issues at the least.


194 posted on 01/29/2016 8:40:22 AM PST by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver
Are morals important?

Is commitment to the family important?

Do you think being divorced twice and married three times is a good thing?

So much wrong here, where to begin. Considering Marriage and Divorce, there are only five mutually exclusive evidential data points possible for a given person ...

Objective reasoning should prevent any intelligent person from jumping to conclusions at this level of data collection as each of those categories can contain anyone from the most "moral" person to the most immoral.

I started to bullet list examples under each of those 5 categories but it quickly ran long, really long. There are practically infinite possibilities for each ranging from perfectly moral folks in bad marriages, cutting loose gold-diggers or cheating spouses, someone murdering their spouses, to immoral degenerate homos staying unmarried or faking it with illusory marriage. That's the tip of the iceberg.

So I'll sum up with simple question ... Which of those 5 scenarios is the moral one? And why can you not quickly disprove this moral judgment through a simple counter example?

To make moral judgments with this bare level of evidence requires one of two things, Amazing Kreskin level of clairvoyance or complete lack of objectivity.

195 posted on 01/29/2016 5:40:59 PM PST by Democratic-Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies]

To: Democratic-Republican

God condemns divorce except in limited cases but I guess you know better.

Yes 2 divorces is all the evidence needed.


196 posted on 01/29/2016 6:54:38 PM PST by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver
God condemns divorce except in limited cases but I guess you know better.

Yes 2 divorces is all the evidence needed.

Know better than God? Hardly. I am an imperfect human being stuck on Earth just like you. But I asked which of those five scenarios represents a moral person? I don't see a clear answer there in your reply. But you have now inspired other questions ...

Let him who is without sin ...

May I suggest for you an awesome FReeper handle ... StoneCaster?

197 posted on 01/29/2016 8:44:55 PM PST by Democratic-Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 196 | View Replies]

To: Democratic-Republican

You utter nothing but nonsense. No difference from liberals who refuse to call evil evil and instead say the person made poor decisions.

Judging the moral fitness of our government representatives is part of what we are instructed to do.


198 posted on 01/30/2016 4:53:19 AM PST by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 197 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver
You utter nothing but nonsense. No difference from liberals who refuse to call evil evil and instead say the person made poor decisions.

Judging the moral fitness of our government representatives is part of what we are instructed to do.

You didn't judge when you had the chance up in post #195. Let's try again.

The five different possibilities for any potential candidate are ...

Okay, now judge. Who's kosher for us to vote for?

199 posted on 01/30/2016 5:11:09 AM PST by Democratic-Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies]

To: Democratic-Republican

More nonsense


200 posted on 01/30/2016 5:17:53 AM PST by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-205 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson