Posted on 01/28/2016 12:59:57 PM PST by ken5050
Trump continues to display a galloping megalomania, a petty, vindictive, nature, and above all, a complete, total, and utter unfitness to be President of the United States.
Unable to let the slightest perceived insult escape his attention, Trump, the other day, resumed his "war" with Megyn Kelly by deciding to opt out of tonight's FOX NEWS debate. OK, while many think it's a very dumb move, and could hurt his campaign, some feel it's a brilliant stroke. We shall see.
Not a chance in hell, even if the media was “ integral functionaries of the despotic regime.”
Me either.
I hear you and agree.......
“and for thinking that Trump should just walk into an ambush, complete with an illegal immigrant, a Muslim, and a protocol in place to “escort” Trump off the stage.”
Whether or not the ‘ambush’ was aimed at Trump is not the issue.
The real issue is that the other, ‘outsider candidates’, ( read ‘outsider candidates’ as all but ‘Yeb, the chosen one’ by the GOPe/RINOs, ) will have to be subjected to the onslaught of the ‘ambushers’. They will be the ‘sacrificial lambs’ for the good of the GOPe/RINOs.
Go piss up a rope..
"I can see David Brock posting huge billboards of a NUDE Melania, in every major city, with this caption: Is THIS what we want for First Lady?"
Oh boy.
You have somehow managed to learn nothing at all about this campaign season, or about men in general. You couldn't possibly select a worse offensive strategy than this. Napoleon and Hitler attacking Russia makes more sense.
Trump will love you for handing him yet another huge victory and no-one will blame him for wiping the floor with folks that go dirty over the wives and children of a candidate. Men will naturally be enraged, women will rally to this lady, the attacker is left all alone.
All you will manage to do is unite everybody who admires Trump or is merely on the fence. And God forbid this line of attack is associated with another candidate because it will harm them greatly. Some candidates' supporters are their own worst enemy, and this is exhibit-A evidence.
I still don't know what this nude thing is about nor do I intend to go looking even though she is a pretty lady. But is this something she may have done earlier in life? Doesn't everybody realize she is from Europe where such things are far less puritan? Jeez Louise.
"Megyn Kelly is beautiful, and also intelligent. A lawyer, ..."
Well if by beautiful you mean Barby-Doll'ed up with enough makeup to be considered camouflage, and if by intelligent you mean a shrill harpy overcompensating for lack of physical height and intellectual capacity and common sense, and if by lawyer you mean an affirmative action law degree filling some quota necessary because we just don't have enough lawyers already, well then I fully agree.
Lately though, something is afoot with her. She either fired her hair and makeup people ( I'm guessing it was a straight woman ) and hired a makeover specialist ( I'm guessing a homo ) to butch up her visuals to match her out of proportion tone of voice. That new haircut may be the worse thing I have ever seen.
I don't watch her but my better half does and despises her more now than before. I can't imagine her with a lot of female fans, so her demographic must be young frustrated males which ironically is the very demographic that smut magazines target.
"Don't look now, but while our best conservative is running a political campaign, Trump is leading a rebellion. Not as a liberal or a conservative politician, but as a successful red-blooded, can-do American capitalist.", Jim Robinson
Whatever, put her a pedestal if you wish. Murdoch will have turn her on other after the big dag is gone. Got to keep that border open
“Someone putting up billboards of Melania Trump in the raw will clinch the WH for Trump...”
—
What on earth have you been smokin’?
.
There may be a person who is “unhinged” in our dialog, but it ain’t me. I don’t disagree that Trump’s marital and romantic histories are issues that could harm him. You could have made your points is a far less flamboyant manner.
I don’t consider art to be dirty. Michelangelo’s David isn’t ‘dirty’, even though it’s ‘full frontal nudity’. There are a hell of a lot of pieces that honor the human form and, yes, I would’ve been honored to be worthy to be featured in such a piece.
The rest of you prudes can cover yourselves in bedsheets and move to Iran. They share your values.
I’ll be happy with either Cruz or Trump as prez.
The “Cruz or Lose” crowd’s war on Trump is making me weary. Please, could you stick to finding things to praise about your guy? If all you can do is try to bring down Trump, it calls into question how strong a candidate Cruz is.
Yes, I’m sure. Thinking of who would play Trumps role in a movie........only one that QUICKLY came to mind Alec Baldwin............I mean to a T.
You are entitled to your personal desire to appear nude in public. I simply don’t wish to be included in among those who share it. I prefer to be clothed in public.
Ken, if you have a point, make it. Be more direct next time. :)
And I've already said repeatedly (including on this very thread), that I'm still with Cruz. But you're making a mountain out of molehill, and YOU are the delusional one if you think any of the nonsense you mentioned would hurt Trump nationally.
Ridicule the ridiculous is all he is doing, fair game.
bkmk
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.