Posted on 02/25/2013 9:25:42 PM PST by Seizethecarp
Today, I had a conversation with an investigator from the Cold Case Posse in AZ. We talked and I expanded on several dossiers filled with evidence for over an hour. They asked for all of my relevant information on Obama, the Harry Bounel alias evidence, and the dossiers I completed on Stanley Ann Dunham, her parents, and Michelle Obama as well. They have it all. BTW they also say that it looks like my information cannot be disproved and will be useful.
I have proof, definitive proof that Stanley Ann Dunham was in WA state in "1961" as per the issuance of a SSN numident in her name with the SSN 535-40-8522. There is no way that she was in HI and I have proof because in the fall she was in college in WA, not HI.
(Excerpt) Read more at obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com ...
This has turned out (as of 200 posts, of which I’ve read all) to be an interesting thread. Thanks again for the Ping to it.
Rather odd to have two numbers. I don't know anyone who has two.
Maybe she couldn't find her number and applied for a second. Would have to assume there was a gap of time between the numbers. Maybe when she returned to Washington and applied a second time.
I'm still thinking that something will out Obama as the son of FMD. A DNA test maybe. Get a hair from one of the Davis kids, and something from Obama. Maybe a hair or a Kleenex tissue. A used razor. It should be possible. Thomas Jeffersons DNA has been traced, why not Obamas.
CSS is national function of the Catholic Church. It has been in the refugee assistance role for a long time. I do not have specifics but below is an example of the service as it currently exist.
http://www.catholiccharitieshawaii.org/site/384/immigrant___refugee_services.aspx
http://www.ccs-soaz.org/Catholic-Social-Service-Migration-and-Refugee-Services.html
The basic question is -
Who was Obama’s legal guardian as of January 1972?
It was not Stanley Ann Dunham, Lolo Soetoro or Barack Obama. That is a fact beyond reproach.
So who was it? Only one explanation has ever come forward. If you remove it it needs to be replaced. As Einstein once said - “Nature abhors a vacuum”. And thus far, only one single explanation of the vacuum of guardianship has come forward. But before debunking the story hard facts that contradict the story MUST come forward. Until they do - Sven’s ‘call on the field’ is, at worst, still under review.
I find this long distance connection to a social security number issued in March of 1977 a stretch and understand the question. But assuming the number is valid and not from an act of brazen identity thief (that Ayers & company were very good at) then the story is about the only one that makes sense.
I've given you the link to the FOI docs compiled by the source. That's all I know.
Bookmarked.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/2040486/posts?page=7679#7679
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/2040486/posts?page=7690#7690
I remember...and there’s lots more on that thread, but there are some freepers who weren’t around at the time and if they didn’t see it, they won’t believe it. Waste of time.
OK is there any reason the grandparents (Stanley and Madelyn) could not have had legal custody?
Other question:
Why would a minor get a s.s. # back then?
I only remember kids getting # because a parent had died and there was money coming in for support, which went into an account that they couldn’t touch till they were of age.
Proof that she was in WA in September is not proof that she was not in HI in August. How hard is that to understand?
Chaos? I'll see you "chaos" and raise you "muz/commie revolution with coast to coast tyranny, economic collapse, re-education camps and worse". So because he got away with breaking laws it's ollie ollie in free?
You have no idea what "conservative" means. "Is 0bastard's eligibility so important that it's worth tearing the country apart?" What kind of steaming pile of excrement is that statement? You think he and his cabal of revolutionaries are not busy tearing the country apart this very minute, with much worse ahead? So in your opinion, criminals who get away with crimes should just get a free ride.
Your attitude makes me want to vomit.
You should re-read your tagline.
Truth is Good. You seem to think truth doesn’t matter.
I can’t believe the numbers of trolls/and/or/idiots on these threads.
Obama’s supporters turning on him? I’ll go on record as saying it will never, ever happen. Their loyalty borders on frightening.
And I can’t believe how many of them there are in the US! That must be how you got a muzzie-loving marxist for POTUS...he’s just a lovable cuddly teddy-bear, what difference does it make if his name is muhammad? (Let him serve out the term he was elected for, and then look around and see if there’s anything left worth trying to salvage...as long as no one gets hurt, nod nod wink wink.)
Who cares if you don’t know where he was born, when he was born, who his parents were...or where his loyalties lie. He’s clean and articulate, remember?
Mussolini had the Black Shirts, he’s got the Black Panthers and all’s well with the world as long as you don’t rock the boat and call him a dictator whose ID is a deep black hole.
Relax. Take it easy. Stay cool. /s.
I’m really not taking this well.
I should just back off of news for a while and embroider or something.
Someone (more than one person) has a copy of the original newspaper (Advertiser and/or Star Bulletin) from August 1961. They're silent about it because to speak would be a death warrant.
No dependent on fed tax return, one dependent on state tax return.
Looks like he lied to the feds.
Wonder why....
It’s too much for me too, closing down for a while. Take care, smell the roses, get some fresh air.
I’m sick so have no energy for anything useful, so spending time on FR. Not a good thing to do right now. I need to get away from this stuff.
Sigh....
At least your country isn’t ruled by a muzzie/commie/fag cabal mentored by Bill Ayers... I really should look into emigrating but I’m too old, I think NZ and OZ have age restrictions on people emigrating there.
“....In 1973, Obama was in the legal custody of Catholic Social Services of Connecticut. It was Catholic Social Services of Connecticut that applied for Obama’s SSN in 1977 as his legal custodian.
I don’t post copies of any evidence I have proving Obama is ineligible because OBOTS begin to scrub the evidence from government offices and manipulate the narrative as soon as its posted. The best approach is to publicly state why Obama is ineligible and then overwhelm the opposition after all Motions to Dismiss are overcome.”
Questions:
Can the govt scrub a religious organizations archives?
Anybody have connections to C.S.S.?
See post #187 this thread. Has tons of info.
On one of the pages, SADO puts down “Ann Obama” on a document/letter/form (don’t remember which one).
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.