Posted on 02/25/2013 9:25:42 PM PST by Seizethecarp
Today, I had a conversation with an investigator from the Cold Case Posse in AZ. We talked and I expanded on several dossiers filled with evidence for over an hour. They asked for all of my relevant information on Obama, the Harry Bounel alias evidence, and the dossiers I completed on Stanley Ann Dunham, her parents, and Michelle Obama as well. They have it all. BTW they also say that it looks like my information cannot be disproved and will be useful.
I have proof, definitive proof that Stanley Ann Dunham was in WA state in "1961" as per the issuance of a SSN numident in her name with the SSN 535-40-8522. There is no way that she was in HI and I have proof because in the fall she was in college in WA, not HI.
(Excerpt) Read more at obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com ...
Great news...good to see the Posse still active.
Of course, the so called “conservative” media will refuse to report this....too busy with talking about Michelle’s booty and the MSNBC hyped squester. Sad we have so many PhonyCon Obama Supporters (I’m looking at you Hannity, Levin, Coulter, Malkin, et al) who continue to give Obama a pass on eligibility
“There is no way that she was in HI and I have proof because in the fall she was in college in WA, not HI.”
Al Hendershot says he has confirmed Arpaio Posse interest in his Harry Bounel file and the links to Mooshell.
While Hendershot has been an able investigator of Barry’s SS# trail it appears that it is news to Hendershot that Barry’s mom was in WA in the fall of 1961. Being in HI in the fall of 1961 does NOT prove that SADO was not in HI earlier in the year, of course.
Bump
It might prove she wasn’t in Hawaii on Aug. 4, 1961??
It might prove she wasn’t in Hawaii on Aug. 4, 1961??
Do you have any information on the unwed Mother’s home in WA?
It may have been connected to the church they attended there...Unitarian?
I had read that they were on the Canadian border and used a Canadian hospital for deliveries for cost savings.
I have read nothing on this for a year or so.
Do you have any information on the unwed Mother’s home in WA?
It may have been connected to the church they attended there...Unitarian?
I had read that they were on the Canadian border and used a Canadian hospital for deliveries for cost savings.
I have read nothing on this for a year or so.
oops, sorry for double post. don’t think I did it.
Everyone knows she was in WA state in the fall of 1961, it’s part of her wiki biography.
This is a big so what.
That's what upsets me about your post. You slander some folks, like Levin and Malkin, for being “PhonyCon” Obama supporters. Levin and Malkin are both great spokespeople for conservative causes. They aren't “Obama Supporters” simply because they disagree with you on eligibility.
While Hendershot has been an able investigator of Barry’s SS# trail it appears that it is news to Hendershot that Barry’s mom was in WA in the fall of 1961. Being in HI in the fall of 1961 does NOT prove that SADO was not in HI earlier in the year, of course.
One thing to note: If SAD was in WA state the fall of ‘61...she would have had to been on the mainland for a while.
The airlines back them did not allow pregnant women 6 mos or more preg. to fly back then...especially an unaccompanied young pregnant women. Also, they were very strict on flying with relatively newborn children...and would have definitely raised alarm with an unaccompanied white women with a black/mixed race baby....even a liberal state like Hawaii would have prevented such travel
My mother experienced this when we had to go back overseas on an accompanied tour of Germany, and they tried to prevent my mom from traveling, as she was 6 mos along w my brother.
“Do you have any information on the unwed Mother’s home in WA?”
No. And I am not inclined to believe she and her family were portraying herself as unwed.
I accept the FOIA documentation as most likely genuine (it destroys Barry’s Dreams narrative). In those documents U of HI staff informed INS that BHO Sr. had impregnated and reportedly “married” a coed on the exact date claimed in the HI marriage record and divorce document, a coed who was living with her parents.
BHO Sr. was already suspected by INS and U of HI (and later Harvard) of being married and also that there was discussion of putting the child up for adoption with the Salvation Army likely due to SADO’s age and BHO Sr’s student status (and the baby’s race?).
Bottom line I don’t see a shameful hiding away in an unwed home, especially when the grandparents announce the birth in the newspaper (I am inclined to regard those announcements as genuine although they do not prove HI birth).
Other than it’s interesting, what difference will it make? No one will confront Obama about more egregious elements of his shady past than this.
That’s what upsets me about your post. You slander some folks, like Levin and Malkin, for being “PhonyCon” Obama supporters. Levin and Malkin are both great spokespeople for conservative causes. They aren’t “Obama Supporters” simply because they disagree with you on eligibility.
Had they taken Obama Eligibility seriously, and not wasted their time and media sphere on piddling issues (who sits on an NRLB is trivial compared to the constiutional eligiblity of the President, Mr Levin)....Obama definitely would not have won a second term, possibly not even finished his first.
And, Michelle Malkin actually attacked the Cold Case Posse in some of her articles....referrring to the Posse and Obama Eligibility people as “Truthers” and comparing them to 9/11 Truthers. And you call that “good for conservative causes”?
It is more than indifference...some of these people have attacked Obama Eligibility folks as bad as MSNBC has (esp Malkin and Coulter). Levin always brags about his “Landmark Legal Foundation got Clinton’s law license revoked in Arkansas”....hey a President who is not eligible is much more important than one who got busy with an intern
They spend more time talking about Michelle Obama’s butt than they do on her husbands eligibility
BTTT.
Bottom line I don’t see a shameful hiding away in an unwed home, especially when the grandparents announce the birth in the newspaper (I am inclined to regard those announcements as genuine although they do not prove HI birth).
A mixed race black/white baby in 1961 would something even the most liberal family would not want out in public. Even in liberal states back in the early ‘60s that was really frowned upon. Something that today would not be an issue....but 50 yrs ago would be
Is Obama’s eligibility so important that it’s worth tearing the country apart? You might think it’s worth it, but most people, even good conservatives, probably wouldn’t.
If it is a blatant breaking of the constitution, YES IT IS!!!
Some principles are worth suffering and even dying for, the TRUTH is one of those.
You make it sound like the country isn’t being torn apart now.
I think we'll find out more about President Obama after he's out of office, but the man's not going to be impeached. I think that's part of the reason why some conservatives aren't interested in pursuing “Truther” discussions. Pragmatically speaking, no one is going to remove a sitting president from office over the sort of “evidence” that's been presented so far or is likely to be found in the future.
As far as conservative pundits making fun of “Truthers,” some Truthers are nutjobs. Sorry. I've read some Obama eligibility theories that border on the absurd. I thought the Cold Case Posse did good work, but even they didn't say Obama’s documents were definite frauds. They only said the documents appeared fake. That's not conclusive evidence that Obama is ineligible.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.