Great news...good to see the Posse still active.
Of course, the so called “conservative” media will refuse to report this....too busy with talking about Michelle’s booty and the MSNBC hyped squester. Sad we have so many PhonyCon Obama Supporters (I’m looking at you Hannity, Levin, Coulter, Malkin, et al) who continue to give Obama a pass on eligibility
“There is no way that she was in HI and I have proof because in the fall she was in college in WA, not HI.”
Al Hendershot says he has confirmed Arpaio Posse interest in his Harry Bounel file and the links to Mooshell.
While Hendershot has been an able investigator of Barry’s SS# trail it appears that it is news to Hendershot that Barry’s mom was in WA in the fall of 1961. Being in HI in the fall of 1961 does NOT prove that SADO was not in HI earlier in the year, of course.
Everyone knows she was in WA state in the fall of 1961, it’s part of her wiki biography.
This is a big so what.
Other than it’s interesting, what difference will it make? No one will confront Obama about more egregious elements of his shady past than this.
BTTT.
Harry Bounel
Sounds tres francais.
Is it a giant white rabbit?
Wasnt Malcolm in Seattle for some convention in 1961?
Sealed OLFBC due to an adoption may be obtained by adult adoptees in some states. To minimize the risk the OLFBC will marked with a statement indicating it is not a legal document.
In Alabama, an unsealed OLFBC is clearly marked with "THIS IS NOT A LEGAL DOCUMENT" to prevent it from being used as identification.
Obama had to edit his OLFBC before posting it to remove "THIS IS NOT A LEGAL DOCUMENT" from it so he could continue the lie he was not adopted by Lolo Soetoro.
Bttt
For those following this thread, forgive my repeated misuse of Truther. People who deny Obama’s eligibility are called Birthers. I don’t typically use either of those labels, so forgive me for using the wrong one in this thread.
Yes, we do know already that Stanley Ann Dunham was in Washington State by late August in 1961, as seen in Dr. Jerome Corsi's book, "Where's the Birth Cirtificate?", published about two years ago. And we do know that she attended the University of Washington in Seattle in the Fall 1961 semester and can also place her at a specific Seattle address at that time. Furthermore, there wasn't much of a controversy about her Social Security number, which is listed with her name in the Social Security Death Index and was issued to her in Washington State.
But even with that info in hand, it is still possible that Stanley Ann was elsewhere, either within the US or in another country. at the time of baby Barack's purported birth, Aug. 4, 1961.
Sincerest best wishes to the Cold Case Posse for ultimate success in solving the Barack Obama birth mystery.
Bookmarked.
I’m having trouble comprehending how you arrive at the conclusion that Stanley Ann was in Washington in 1961. The document to which you link indicates the Social Security number was issued from 1959-1961.
Am I missing something?
She left Hawaii after Obama was born and moved to Washington State to go to school.
Thank you for posting this thread. It led to an epiphany. First, a little background. I have been active on this site for quite some time, and I’ve been a birther for a very long time. As such, I made a lot of online friends who are active in the FR birther community. Some have been pretty good friends: fun, funny, witty, and just overall enjoyable people to know. Others were just brothers-in-arms, but as such they were solid compatriots and really decent people.
But of course I’m speaking about these people in the pre-SADO-Not-The-Mother-Theory [SNTMT] days. One by one, as my good friends embraced this theory, they changed. They went from friendly, collegial and engaging people to hostile, vicious and aggressively uncivil people. They turned on old friends on a dime, and attacked them w abusive posts of the type formerly not even allowed on FR. The rest (of the SNTNT subscribers) looked on w approval. All because one nonbeliever or another questioned their theory.
So I asked myself, how can a person’s personality change so much? What can take a formerly decent, pleasant individual and turn him/her into a rabid attack dog?
What did it in this case is what amounts to ‘birther enlightenment’. They discovered ‘the truth’. A truth known only on FR—it has not one single proponent on the Net’s preeminent birther site, BirtherReport/ObamaReleaseYourRecords. Not one. The only place on the entire Net where this truth has a toehold/even-a-very-limited-following is on FR.
Now here’s the really interesting part. Once a person sees the light/embraces this particular truth, they turn vicious. It doesn’t matter how long they may have known a good, solid conservative, or how friendly they were w that person in the past. If that person fails to embrace the SNTMT, they become The Enemy. They are brutally and very personally attacked. What’s even more interesting is this: no matter how vile and protracted the attack, none of that person’s former friends ever, not once, intervenes. I.e.: no one [who embraces SNTMT, anyway] says, ‘Hey, that is a good conservative and a long-time Freeper. How about lightening up a little on the personal stuff?’
Rather, once a person knows the real birther-truth, no personal attack on a nonbeliever is over the top. The goal is to destroy the nonbeliever, and to that ends any degree of nastiness and even dishonesty is condoned.
So I asked myself, what other truth has this effect on its believers? I couldn’t think of any. Normally, when a person discovers a great truth—such as that Jesus really is the Lord and Savior—they become nicer, not meaner. They care more for their friends, not less. Disloyalty and abusive behavior don’t replace kindness and caring.
So what is it that is so unique about the SNTMT that causes such a vicious reaction in its proponents? Why does this truth singularly convert warmth and friendship into hatred and abuse?
The truth may be found in a post written by FN. Here it is the revelatory part:
[me] “ ‘...You may disagree w Edge, but a more staunch defender of the Constitution you will not find. Just a little something to think about, when the rhetoric turns heated.’
[FN] Deserves an answer...I’ll remind you I am an Australian. What I have seen so far is that your precious constitution hasn’t been able to save you from your current situation. The truth might.”
Notice the pejorative toward our Constitution. It’s ‘precious’ in a demeaning sense, and it hasn’t ‘saved’ us from our current situation/crisis. But the truth might.
And there it is in a nutshell. To the proponents of birther-enlightenment, what they have discovered trumps even the US Constitution. It rises to such a level of criticality, it may end up saving us as a nation, as opposed to the Constitution which has failed.
Obviously any truth of this magnitude is going to trump all else: friendship, kindness, decency, you name it. The truth becomes everything. Once you come to the place where the truth (re: Barry/Barack’s parents) supercedes even the US Constitution, of course you have to browbeat, attack and destroy anything that gets in the way. The survival of the nation is at stake, and only true believers can save it. No amount of collateral damage is too high a price to pay. Thus former friends do indeed become The Enemy, and no kind or degree of personal attack, no matter how dishonest or vile, is over the top. This is the real truth of SNTMT. Nothing less explains it. Period.
Really happy to see that this is still being investigated.
Quote from Al Hendershot’s blog:
“....I have proof,definitive proof that Stanley Ann Dunham was in WA state in “1961” as per the issuance of a SSN numident in her name with the SSN 535-40-8522. There is no way that she was in HI and I have proof because in the fall she was in college in WA,not HI......”
Would love to know the date on that doc, so we know if she was in Washington state in the entire year of 1961.
That doesn’t preclude a possible visit to Hawaii for the Christmas break in 1959 and possibly going to some parties and possibly encountering 0 SR.
Now when was it that she met him?
(.....searching......)