Posted on 09/05/2011 6:31:23 AM PDT by vasnas
Reading a skan-original "first printed" of the Ostrozhsky (OstRih) Bible of 1581 y. (see - Sources), auxiliary I've used traditional Synodal (RST) and Church-slavic (CS) versions. Soon I began to notice a difference of senses in texts of Bibles. Reading, only for the sake of acquaintance with a curiosity, has turned to the most fascinating detective research. The book "Exod", in (RST), (CS), (OstRih), (Torah), and parts of other books, a line by a line - in parallel, has been read, and the differential table is made. (drafts: bible-exodus.narod.ru) Gradually I linked up other canonical and uncanonical Bibles to comparison (see Sources), including, electronic versions of Bibles of 'The Sword Project'. The intention of my researches was not to prove something, being based on "indisputability" of the selected sources, but only to draw the attention to an informative difference of their texts. And usually, there where it was, opened new, was cleared up dim ... At this stage trustworthiness of sources of absolute value had no. Soon behind a difference of texts which could be accepted sometimes for a typing error, the tendency of deliberate distortions began and overwondering to come to light. For example, if in the majority of old canonical Bibles, the Moses led the people (KJV) "into the midst of the sea upon the dry" - (AB) "the waves were congealed in the midst of the sea", but in the Bible of 2000 (RBC) it is already unambiguously specified "on a sea floor". It happened a qualitative turn in perception of annals of Exod with accumulation of the material . Obvious distortions have served as a key to restoration of initial sense of all.. The appearenced picture grasped, before unknown, feeling of almost visual vision of ancient events. Vitally natural, they, followed one another, proceeding one from another, as links of one indissoluble chain. Developing interest forced me to go further and further in clearing up of this ancient, and now such close truth of a life. Eventually, I reconstructed, an outline of events obvious to me, and I bring to your attention the first of reviews - 'The plagues of Egypt' - a volcanic winter.
Please go to the link
http://new.chronologia.org/polemics/poltavsky/the_10_plagues_of_egypt_is_a_volcanic_winter_exodus_crimea_en.html
Bravo.
That’s horrible Russian, and worst phonetic English.
Oh yeah? I’m sure I would suck even worse at being a communist.
I’m such a failure. Hangs head, wrings hands...
teehee
Welcome to Free Republic, and ultimately, good bye.......
Loved this guy in Babylon 5.
>>>Moseses?
Ten hot little Moseses
Running through hoseses
Wetting their toeseses;
Their frazzled Mommieses
Counting their noseses.
I think he beat up Spell Check and took his lunch money.
It’s just too bad this couldn’t have been the Friday Undead Thread.
The figure I read would put Exodus well before the reign of Ramases the great. Who I figure was strong enough to swat down those pesky slaves. I see it as happening around the time of Hatshepsut (1473-1458) and Tutmosis III (1479-1425) -- Eighteenth Dynasty, dates approximate.Speaking of chronology revisions and pseudochronologies, the New Kingdom dates are off. This has been confirmed at least twice using RC dating -- which is why Zahi Hawass (among others) claim that RC dating doesn't work right on Egyptian artifacts. The actual canopic jars of Ramses II had their contents (his guts) RC dated a few years back, and (just as Velikovsky wrote in the 1970s) the conventional date is wrong by over 700 years.
Oh, I think we may have gotten well beyond WTF. ;’)
Gotta give him an E for effort though. Or an F for FUBAR.
What 1rudeboy said.
I can’t believe this poster hasn’t gotten the zot. The mods must not have noticed him yet. ....Probably off enjoying their labor day....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.