DOH indirectly confirms: Factcheck COLB date filed and certificate number impossible

Butterdezillion | Feb 23, 2010 | Butterdezillion

[butterdezillion]

I've updated my blog to include the e-mail from Janice Okubo confirming that they assign birth certificate numbers in the state registrar's office and the day they do that is the "Date filed by state registrar".

The pertinent portion from Okubo's e-mail:

In regards to the terms “date accepted” and “date filed” on a Hawaii birth certificate, the department has no records that define these terms. Historically, the terms “Date accepted by the State Registrar” and “Date filed by the State Registrar” referred to the date a record was received in a Department of Health office (on the island of O’ahu or on the neighbor islands of Kaua’i, Hawai’i, Maui, Moloka’i, or Lana’i), and the date a file number was placed on a record (only done in the main office located on the island of O’ahu) respectively.

MY SUMMARY: As you can see, Okubo said that the “Date filed by the State Registrar” is the date a file number was placed on a record (only done in the main office).

There are no pre-numbered certificates. A certificate given a certificate number on Aug 8th (Obama’s Factcheck COLB) would not be given a later number than a certificate given a number on Aug 11th (the Nordyke certificates).

There is no way that both the date filed and the certificate number can be correct on the Factcheck COLB. The COLB is thus proven to be a forgery.

[EnderWiggins]

"And how could it be on your site if it wasn’t on your computer?"

I guess you must not know how the internet works? I don't have a site. It's on another computer, not mine... a free file hosting website. I uploaded it there so I could share it, since I can't upload to FR from my computer.

It's really very simple.

[Las Vegas Ron]

It wasn't scanned. It is a digital photograph.

Did you take it or get it from another source?

[EnderWiggins]

Post 2,434 Ron.

[little jeremiah]

Couldn’t clicking a link make it so that our ISPs or other info is noted.

I’m a techtard so I know nothing about this kind of stuff.

[Darksheare]

LOL, more misdirection from the troll.

Hey, as an aside, how about those weather underground morons who were more successful at blowing themselves up instead of anyone else?
You remind me of them.

[Darksheare]

Yes.
And tif files can be poisoned to run malicious code.

[DJ MacWoW]

Couldn’t clicking a link make it so that our ISPs or other info is noted.

YES!

[KenyanBCPunkster]

You made a fake BC and can’t remember the names you put on it?!

Of course I remember the names I put on it.

Again, what was the question being asked when he said "You mean the E.F. Lavender document..."?

[KenyanBCPunkster]

If you want good quality, you scan it. Digital camera leads to too many artifacts.

I didn't want a scanned image. I wanted a photographic image of a three dimensional document under natural light.

[Darksheare]

He got it off the interwebs.

[Darksheare]

You get two dimensions regardless.
And quality is better, trust me on this.

[Candor7]

Prove it PUNK!

[Darksheare]

Don’t you know?
YOU supposedly made it.

[DJ MacWoW]

Of course I remember the names I put on it.

Apparently not.

[Darksheare]

Annnd... busted.

[EnderWiggins]

He’s pointing out that it wasn’t a question.

It was a statement.

So, what question are you suggesting he answer when there wasn’t a question to begin with?

[Las Vegas Ron]

He got it off the interwebs.

He's also wasting our time.

[Darksheare]

LOL, yes, it was a question.
If you don’t uderstand it, then that is entirely your problem.

[Las Vegas Ron]

Got it

[EnderWiggins]

You might have noticed... Orly’s photo was not a scanned image, t was a digital photograph.

Or did you miss that?