Posted on 02/23/2010 8:02:16 AM PST by butterdezillion
I've updated my blog to include the e-mail from Janice Okubo confirming that they assign birth certificate numbers in the state registrar's office and the day they do that is the "Date filed by state registrar".
The pertinent portion from Okubo's e-mail:
In regards to the terms “date accepted” and “date filed” on a Hawaii birth certificate, the department has no records that define these terms. Historically, the terms “Date accepted by the State Registrar” and “Date filed by the State Registrar” referred to the date a record was received in a Department of Health office (on the island of O’ahu or on the neighbor islands of Kaua’i, Hawai’i, Maui, Moloka’i, or Lana’i), and the date a file number was placed on a record (only done in the main office located on the island of O’ahu) respectively.
MY SUMMARY: As you can see, Okubo said that the “Date filed by the State Registrar” is the date a file number was placed on a record (only done in the main office).
There are no pre-numbered certificates. A certificate given a certificate number on Aug 8th (Obama’s Factcheck COLB) would not be given a later number than a certificate given a number on Aug 11th (the Nordyke certificates).
There is no way that both the date filed and the certificate number can be correct on the Factcheck COLB. The COLB is thus proven to be a forgery.
What do you actually KNOW about him that he hasn't told you?
no thats wrong.
born in country=citizen=natural born subject
Thats the UK system, any citizen can be Prime Minster. I should know I live here.
You cant say because Wong Kim Ark quotes UK common law in a cite that the US suddenly adopted UK common law.
There is no Common Law in the US.
There is the US constitution and statute law.
The US constitution says natural born citizen not natural born subject. You must look backwards for the definition, not forwards, unless the US supreme court defines Article II NBC *exactly and specifically*.
Its meaningless to quote a case about the hapless Kim Wong Ark, which is about making the man an exception to the chinese exclusion laws. It made him a citizen *not* a natural born citizen.
“There is no Common Law in the US.”
Yes there is. It is all over the place here, maybe less in Louisiana. Look up something called “reception statutes”
parsy, who just found out Reagan was an illegal president...
Plus, look at Wong and that Indiana case. Why is all that English stuff in there. Plus, you might want to research/google “Blackstone America influence”
parsy
Plus, look at Wong and that Indiana case. Why is all that English stuff in there. Plus, you might want to research/google “Blackstone America influence”
parsy
Parsifal // Dec 23, 2009 at 7:49 pm
What does it say about us that all of our Founding Fathers were of the political class, none more so than James Madison (virtually the Federalist Papers personified), and looked upon themselves as born to reign and others to obey? Perhaps it is heartening that somehow we managed to survive them.
Don’t recall it ????
paesy...
My father would have done all the paper work after my birth.
BC info and such.
My mother was basically telling me that no one asked at the hospital about putting the birth announcement in the paper or they would have given them the info.
And neither my father or mother took any action to contact the local papers to give the info.
So my mother was saying because she didn’t give nor was asked for the birth info, no announcement made it in the papers.
And if one was put in any of the papers anyway they (mom or dad - news junkies) would have noticed it and clipped it out.
Then you don’t hold the Founders in high regard.......?
?????
parsy
I don’t play the Loyalty Test Gotcha Game. I put words in my own mouth.
parsy. who says you have been acting strange since you discovered Reagan was not an NBC according to Birther logic
Is that your post?
?????
parsy
It’s a sad state of affairs in the US of A when communist ideas run rampant without being checked for generations.
Parsifal // Dec 24, 2009 at 12:00 am
Their concern was not the desire to frame a form of limited government but one that would protect them from “mobocracy.” They so feared that the “mob” might not look up to them for the guidance they were certain they were the only ones qualified to give that they created a cockamamie, increasingly creaky electoral system to ensure that their political class would have the best chance at continued power.
Yes it is.
?????
parsy, who asks what part of ????? do you not get? WTF are you talking about????
Common sense says that if you didn’t write it, you’d say so.
Did that change when your sister was born? How did they do it when she was born, and how many years apart were your births?
Not wanting to snoop or anything... ;)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.