Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Newly found species fills evolutionary gap between fish and land animals
EurekAlert (AAAS) ^ | 05 April 2006 | Staff

Posted on 04/05/2006 10:32:31 AM PDT by PatrickHenry

Paleontologists have discovered fossils of a species that provides the missing evolutionary link between fish and the first animals that walked out of water onto land about 375 million years ago. The newly found species, Tiktaalik roseae, has a skull, a neck, ribs and parts of the limbs that are similar to four-legged animals known as tetrapods, as well as fish-like features such as a primitive jaw, fins and scales.

These fossils, found on Ellesmere Island in Arctic Canada, are the most compelling examples yet of an animal that was at the cusp of the fish-tetrapod transition. The new find is described in two related research articles highlighted on the cover of the April 6, 2006, issue of Nature.

"Tiktaalik blurs the boundary between fish and land-living animal both in terms of its anatomy and its way of life," said Neil Shubin, professor and chairman of organismal biology at the University of Chicago and co-leader of the project.

Tiktaalik was a predator with sharp teeth, a crocodile-like head and a flattened body. The well-preserved skeletal material from several specimens, ranging from 4 to 9 feet long, enabled the researchers to study the mosaic pattern of evolutionary change in different parts of the skeleton as fish evolved into land animals.

The high quality of the fossils also allowed the team to examine the joint surfaces on many of the fin bones, concluding that the shoulder, elbow and wrist joints were capable of supporting the body-like limbed animals.

"Human comprehension of the history of life on Earth is taking a major leap forward," said H. Richard Lane, director of sedimentary geology and paleobiology at the National Science Foundation. "These exciting discoveries are providing fossil 'Rosetta Stones' for a deeper understanding of this evolutionary milestone--fish to land-roaming tetrapods."

One of the most important aspects of this discovery is the illumination of the fin-to-limb transition. In a second paper in the journal, the scientists describe in depth how the pectoral fin of the fish serves as the origin of the tetrapod limb.

Embedded in the fin of Tiktaalik are bones that compare to the upper arm, forearm and primitive parts of the hand of land-living animals.

"Most of the major joints of the fin are functional in this fish," Shubin said. "The shoulder, elbow and even parts of the wrist are already there and working in ways similar to the earliest land-living animals."

At the time that Tiktaalik lived, what is now the Canadian Arctic region was part of a landmass that straddled the equator. It had a subtropical climate, much like the Amazon basin today. The species lived in the small streams of this delta system. According to Shubin, the ecological setting in which these animals evolved provided an environment conducive to the transition to life on land.

"We knew that the rocks on Ellesmere Island offered a glimpse into the right time period and the right ancient environments to provide the potential for finding fossils documenting this important evolutionary transition," said Ted Daeschler of the Academy of Natural Sciences in Philadelphia, a co-leader of the project. "Finding the fossils within this remote, rugged terrain, however, required a lot of time and effort."

The nature of the deposits where the fossils were found and the skeletal structure of Tiktaalik suggests the animal lived in shallow water and perhaps even out of the water for short periods.

"The skeleton of Tiktaalik indicates that it could support its body under the force of gravity whether in very shallow water or on land," said Farish Jenkins, professor of organismic and evolutionary biology at Harvard University and co-author of the papers. "This represents a critical early phase in the evolution of all limbed animals, including humans--albeit a very ancient step."

The new fossils were collected during four summers of exploration in Canada's Nunavut Territory, 600 miles from the North Pole, by paleontologists from the Academy of Natural Sciences in Philadelphia, the University of Chicago and Harvard University. Although the team has amassed a diverse assemblage of fossil fish, Shubin said, the discovery of these transitional fossils in 2004 was a vindication of their persistence.

The scientists asked the Nunavut people to propose a formal scientific name for the new species. The Elders Council of Nunavut, the Inuit Qaujimajatuqangit, suggested "Tiktaalik" (tic-TAH-lick)--the word in the Inuktikuk language for "a large, shallow water fish."

The scientists worked through the Department of Culture, Language, Elders and Youth in Nunavut to collaborate with the local Inuit communities. All fossils are the property of the people of Nunavut and will be returned to Canada after they are studied.

###

The team depended on the maps of the Geological Survey of Canada. The researchers received permits from the Department of Culture, Language, Elders and Youth of the Government of Nunavut, and logistical support in the form of helicopters and bush planes from Polar Continental Shelf Project of Natural Resources Canada. The National Science Foundation and the National Geographic Society, along with an anonymous donor, also helped fund the project.


TOPICS: Heated Discussion
KEYWORDS: 375millionyears; coelacanth; crevolist; lungfish; tiktaalik; transitional
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 761-780781-800801-820 ... 1,501-1,512 next last
To: jec41
I agree about them being separate because of methods. Actually, the whole philosophical reasoning by logic makes absolute sense to me. If I'm going to engage in a debate. I pretty much follow this line of thinking. But, as for me personally, it seems that we loose something when we try to me so methodical. I'm not referring to philosophy, or science as a profession, but as people, in our daily lives. I guess I just don't agree, from a personal perspective, that faith is irrational. It can be! I think it's wrong to generalize it though. Many people have had "experiences" in life where faith has been the only thing to guide them through a course of action. Sometimes we do illogical things, because of faith, because we believe that it's what's right. Humans are emotional beings. Philosophy doesn't rule out emotion, but nearly. Emotions are only rational if they can be reasoned. If you go along that line of thinking, then love is very often an illegitimate emotion. It hurts us, at times, we will sacrifice far more for it then is reasonable, it clouds our judgment, it's unpredictable, yet we crave it. For most people, it's needed. There is something about us that is elusive when it comes down to mapping the thought process in a logical manner. I dare say that it could be "spirituality". I don't know! We just seem to become very flat, two dimensional, when we try to capture, reason, and understand everything about us. I think there is a great deal about humanity that we do not know.

I have a good story to go along with this, but before I tell it let me add that I do not believe I'm psychic.

My son got a tent for his 11th birthday. We lived, at the time, in a gated subdivision with a neighborhood watch, and a zealous homeowners association. My son was so excited about the tent. He couldn't wait to sleep in it. So, he asked if it would be okay to sleep in the back yard. I told him yes. He happily set it up, and then prepared his little camp site for that evening. As it got closer to bed time, I began to have this almost sick feeling. It was kind of like something pounding in my head and twisting my gut. I just really felt "wrong" about him sleeping outside. I had no reason to! He'd done it before with an older tent. This feeling would not go away. I called him into my room and told him that I preferred he not sleep outside this particular night. He asked why, and all I could say was, "I don't know. For some reason my Mommy Alarm is going off." Pretty silly huh! Mommy alarm, how logical is that? Anyhow, he's a good boy. He giggled at my new term, and then said,"Okay." He didn't fuss with me. Which was a good thing, since I had no logical reason, I probably would have let him. The following morning his tent was gone. It had not been windy. We looked all over. there was no sign of it. I felt quite glad about him sleeping inside that night.
Now this was a mystery. I did believe the tent had been stolen, but I had no clue who would have done it, or if my son would have been in harm's way had he slept in the tent. We have moved since then, but about 4 months ago, my former neighbor told me about some incidents with a 19 year old boy in the house behind our former residence. His family moved into the subdivision about a year before we moved away. It seems this young man had some mental problems. He had been caught stealing stuff from other neighbors yards in the past. This would have been around the same time as my son's tent, I was just unaware of this. Apparently things had escalated with him though. His neighbor's house, which was directly behind my former neighbor's house, had a very nice outbuilding full of all kinds of stuff. One night while the family was asleep in their house, their outbuilding was set ablaze. It burned to the ground, burned a good portion of the house, and also caught the boat on fire. The young man was arrested for arson. It turns out that this was not this young man's first incident with the law. He had, as a stated before, mental issues, and had been in and out of treatment. I believe that some of his prior incidents were attributed to his mental condition. They did involve violence. There are other things that I have heard about him as well, but I know that unsubstantiated rumors tend to fly around in cases like this. I don't know if this young man was the one who took my son's tent, or if he would have harmed him in the process. That same gut feeling says that both of those things would have been so. Either way, I was quite thankful for my Mommy Alarm that night. It would not have been worth finding out whether or not I was wrong.



Having said all this about faith, and intuition, because it is what I personally "feel", I don't know another way to reason through subject matter with others then through philosophy. It's good to be free to depart from time to time in my own life though.
781 posted on 04/06/2006 9:53:05 AM PDT by Conservative Texan Mom (Some people say I'm stubborn, when it's usually just that I'm right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 597 | View Replies]

To: William Terrell

Thank you for your admission that you have absolutely no evidence or facts to present for your claims.


782 posted on 04/06/2006 9:53:06 AM PDT by Dimensio (http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 770 | View Replies]

Useless to further discuss this placemarker.


783 posted on 04/06/2006 9:54:49 AM PDT by js1138 (~()):~)>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 775 | View Replies]

To: CarolinaGuitarman
You have it a%^-backwards. You want the law of the land to recognize your clearly subjective claim (ID).

I am not the one asking for exclusivity of a philosphy by law. You and your buddies are.

784 posted on 04/06/2006 9:59:33 AM PDT by Fester Chugabrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 776 | View Replies]

Workin' in a quote mine
Goin' down down down
Workin' in a quote mine
Whop! about to slip down
Workin' in a quote mine
Goin' down down down
Workin' in a quote mine
Whop! about to slip down
Five o'clock in the mornin'
I'm all ready up and gone
Lord I am so tired
How long can this go on?


785 posted on 04/06/2006 10:00:59 AM PDT by js1138 (~()):~)>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 783 | View Replies]

To: Fester Chugabrew
"I am not the one asking for exclusivity of a philosphy by law."

Science isn't philosophy; evolutionary biology is science, not philosophy. You are trying to get a philosophical/theological claim (ID) forced into a science classroom. The affect will be to weaken rational thinking. It's a direct assault on Man's reason.
786 posted on 04/06/2006 10:06:21 AM PDT by CarolinaGuitarman ("There is grandeur in this view of life....")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 784 | View Replies]

To: Fester Chugabrew

As we all tend to view new information in terms of our persuasion, and how it relates to it. It would be interesting to see what new hypothesis might arise if there was no theory of evolution. Perhaps this fossil would lead to that very theory, or not?
Just a thought.


787 posted on 04/06/2006 10:09:12 AM PDT by Conservative Texan Mom (Some people say I'm stubborn, when it's usually just that I'm right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 629 | View Replies]

To: Fester Chugabrew
IOW, the simplest explanation is not necessarily the truest one.

Agreed. Although this does not pertain to the inherent incongruity I pointed out -- i.e., the claim that introduction of an unexplained and inexplicable supernatural agency is consistent with Occam's Razor.

In fact, it is evolutionists who throw up their hands and say "We don't know, and what cannot know, what is behind this mere 'appearance' of organization."

Really? You mean, for example, that crystallization is explained by the "mere appearance of organization"? That growth from seed or embryo to full biological maturity is explained by the "mere appearance of organization"? That hurricane formation is explained by the "mere appearance of organization"? I had no idea that magic was such a central concept in science.

788 posted on 04/06/2006 10:11:57 AM PDT by atlaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 763 | View Replies]

To: Zavien Doombringer
ANd you have a source for this where... You are hoping that the Bible is all mythology... that is not true, it is an accurate history book. Being a SCIENTIST, you must have your evidence of this fact you state.

I need "prove" nothing. Please provide the scientific qualifications of the authors of your text. "God" is not a scientific answer.

789 posted on 04/06/2006 10:14:59 AM PDT by freedumb2003 (Don't call them "Illegal Aliens." Call them what they are: CRIMINAL INVADERS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 615 | View Replies]

Nuts-and-ID-flakes placemarker.


790 posted on 04/06/2006 10:17:32 AM PDT by balrog666 (Irrational beliefs inspire irrational posts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 785 | View Replies]

To: Zavien Doombringer
The truth would be that the two boards can be joined, not in the how.

Which only serves to prove my point. Truth is not absolute in all, or even most, conceptual or practically applicable circumstances.

791 posted on 04/06/2006 10:17:58 AM PDT by atlaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 762 | View Replies]

To: TitansAFC
Wow. This is a great find! Now we know how animals went from living on land to living in the seas! Their forearms, shoulders, and wrists eventually gave way to fins!

By taking that one sentence out of context, I can see how one could arrive at this conclusion. But, the rest of the article makes it clear that, with this fish, at least, it happened the other way around.

Now, whales on the other hand, did adapt from living on land to living in the sea. (See: Living whales found with hindlimbs)

792 posted on 04/06/2006 10:22:25 AM PDT by Ol' Dan Tucker (Karen Ryan reporting...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 550 | View Replies]

To: Dimensio

Darwinism and evolution are a joke and a sick one at that. That should be simple enough for you to understand.


793 posted on 04/06/2006 10:35:28 AM PDT by eleni121 ('Thou hast conquered, O Galilean!' (Julian the Apostate))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 559 | View Replies]

To: eleni121
Darwinism and evolution are a joke and a sick one at that. That should be simple enough for you to understand.

Why is evolution a joke?
794 posted on 04/06/2006 10:37:06 AM PDT by Dimensio (http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 793 | View Replies]

To: Conservative Texan Mom
It would be interesting to see what new hypothesis might arise if there was no theory of evolution.

Feel free to make one. Hypotheses are made, not discovered.

795 posted on 04/06/2006 10:37:25 AM PDT by js1138 (~()):~)>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 787 | View Replies]

To: eleni121
"Darwinism and evolution are a joke and a sick one at that. That should be simple enough for you to understand."

Now that was a deep and penetrating analysis. lol

796 posted on 04/06/2006 10:38:04 AM PDT by CarolinaGuitarman ("There is grandeur in this view of life....")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 793 | View Replies]

To: js1138; betty boop
My beef is with those who distort or deny physical evidence in an attempt to prove something that they cannot possibly know.

Indeed. Thank you for your reply!
797 posted on 04/06/2006 10:40:28 AM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 733 | View Replies]

To: CarolinaGuitarman; Dimensio

You guys work in tandem. LOL


798 posted on 04/06/2006 10:40:33 AM PDT by eleni121 ('Thou hast conquered, O Galilean!' (Julian the Apostate))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 796 | View Replies]

To: eleni121
"You guys work in tandem. LOL"

Brilliant rebuttal! lol
799 posted on 04/06/2006 10:41:34 AM PDT by CarolinaGuitarman ("There is grandeur in this view of life....")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 798 | View Replies]

To: CarolinaGuitarman
Not all Christians worship the Bible like it's some kind of idol.

Your statement is false on the face of it.

800 posted on 04/06/2006 10:44:53 AM PDT by muawiyah (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 755 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 761-780781-800801-820 ... 1,501-1,512 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson