Agreed. Although this does not pertain to the inherent incongruity I pointed out -- i.e., the claim that introduction of an unexplained and inexplicable supernatural agency is consistent with Occam's Razor.
In fact, it is evolutionists who throw up their hands and say "We don't know, and what cannot know, what is behind this mere 'appearance' of organization."
Really? You mean, for example, that crystallization is explained by the "mere appearance of organization"? That growth from seed or embryo to full biological maturity is explained by the "mere appearance of organization"? That hurricane formation is explained by the "mere appearance of organization"? I had no idea that magic was such a central concept in science.
No. That the cause behind the process is beyond the grasp of science.