Posted on 10/03/2005 6:22:51 AM PDT by PatrickHenry
After a weekend break from a court case involving intelligent design, the Dover school board officials will face business as usual. The board today will hold its first school board meeting since the trial began.
On Sunday, Dover school board member David Napierski said he sympathized with the time fellow members Shelia Harkins and Alan Bonsell have spent on the court case.
I really havent seen it erode them from their duties, he said. It definitely has taken a lot of their time . . . I think it is sapping some of the people, too.
The trial began Sept. 26 in U.S. Middle District Court in Harrisburg. It resumes Wednesday.
Napierski hopes to attend at least one day per week of the trial.
Were seeing one side of the whole picture right now, he said. I think its going to go all the way up to the Supreme Court.
He said dealing with the court case while running the school district is a double-edged sword.
I just hope and pray that our focus will stay on business, he said.
School district residents might have a difficult time resuming day-to-day life as it was before the trial began.
Lonnie Langioni left his position as a school board member in Dover in 2003. He said the issue has divided the community and he wants folks to again be friends.
Were just going to have to let it run its course, he said about the trial. Im just waiting for the day that this is all over and that the people of Dover can go back to talking to each other again.
He said he follows the case and reads newspapers and articles online.
Its crossed all kinds of lines, he said of the trial. Dover is a great community. We all need to respect each others viewpoints.
Former Dover school board member Barrie Callahan, a plaintiff in the court case, is ready to spend more time in court this week.
The case needs to proceed, she said Saturday. I know the issue. To see it through the process is truly fascinating.
Youre seeing the best of the best, she said about attorneys. It is an honor to be in their presence.
She said shes been following news of the trial posted online.
Its not about little tiny Dover, she said. This case really, really is important.
UPDATE
Trial schedule: The trial resumes Wednesday and Thursday in U.S. Middle District Court in Harrisburg and is scheduled to continue Oct. 12, 14, 17 through 21, 24, 27 and Nov. 2 through 4.
At stake: Its the most significant court challenge to evolution since 1987, and its the first time a court has been asked to rule whether intelligent design can be taught in public schools. Experts say the cases outcome could influence how science is defined and taught in schools across the country. The lead defense lawyer said he wanted to take the case to the U.S. Supreme Court.
Coming this week: Among the scheduled witnesses: Dover school district science teacher Bertha Spahr and Jennifer Miller and plaintiffs Cynthia Sneath, Joel Leib and Deb Fenimore.
Barbara Forrest, a professor of philosophy at Southeastern Louisiana University, also is scheduled. Forrest co-authored Creationisms Trojan Horse, subtitled The Wedge of Intelligent Design.
So humans exist to make the universe taste better to whomever is going to eat it?
But does it mix well with vodka?
That sounds about 50 IQ points higher than Hedy Lamarr.
That's probably why the great composer, Johann Gambolputty de von Ausfern-schplenden-schlitter-crasscrenbon-fried-digger-dingle-dangle-dongle-dungle-burstein-von-knacker-thrasher-apple-banger-horowitz-ticolensic-grander-knotty-spelltinkle-grandlich-grumblemeyer-spelterwasser-kurstlich-himbleeisen-bahnwagen-gutenabend-bitte-ein-nürnburger- bratwustle-gerspurten-mitz-weimache-luber-hundsfut-gumberaber-shönedanker-kalbsfleisch-mittler-aucher von Hautkopft of Ulm, changed his stage name to Fred.
"I've had a catfish live for 36 hours out of the water. I forgot about it and was suprized to find it still alive. A tough fish isn't evidence of evolution though.
I take it that the way biologists (ichthyologists) check for lungs or float bladders by chasing fish across land to see how long they survive? I thought they dissected the fish and analyzed what they found within it before making claims.
Oh, btw, do the snakeheads die of asphyxiation or dehydration.
Is it necessary for a transitional organism to have fully developed lungs that allow it to survive totally on the oxygen from the air or should it have partially effective lungs that allow it to survive for a limited time out of water?
That's a bit overly literal. Anyway, your comment brought it to mind and I thought it an interesting twist.
Hey, she liked colors and she was an actress. What's to invent?
Sorry, bad habit of mine. I admonish all my countrymen who have a tendency to do so, not to overgeneralize about Americans. It's OK to attack the policies of a government, but not the general population. IMHO.
Which ones?
One of these days I'm going to record the various kinds of arguments/posters I've come across on these threads.
actually the main stream consensus view is that we were created, and did not evolve
I attempted something like that, a few years ago. I think it's buried in one of your early compendiums (or compendia).
"actually the main stream consensus view is that we were created, and did not evolve"
Not among people who actually study science. Most people don't know what a molecule is either.
"Do you personally believe in the existence of each of the following? . . . "
UFOs 34%
Ghosts 34%
Astrology 29%
Reincarnation 25%
Witches 24%
It's down near the bottom. To find it, search on "ghosts."
I find it interesting that only one evolutionist bothered to reply to your most detailed post; and it wasn't very coherent.
Seems to me that if you were wrong in your citations of Darwin, Gould, and others; they would have pointed it out.
Actually, I believe the mainstream consensus is that you were born from parents in an evolving population.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.