To: Nathan Zachary
I find it interesting that only one evolutionist bothered to reply to your most detailed post; and it wasn't very coherent.
Seems to me that if you were wrong in your citations of Darwin, Gould, and others; they would have pointed it out.
To: Nathan Zachary
100 million fossils of 250,000 different species. .. should permit objective investigators to determine if Darwin was on the right track. .. The gaps between major groups of organisms have been growing even wider and more undeniable. They can no longer be ignored or rationalized away with appeals to imperfection of the fossil record.
Powerful material quoted Nathan Zachary, thank you for bringing it here.
Wolf
303 posted on
10/03/2005 5:00:29 PM PDT by
RunningWolf
(tag line limbo)
To: connectthedots; Nathan Zachary
"I find it interesting that only one evolutionist bothered to reply to your most detailed post; and it wasn't very coherent. " NZ was trying to use quote-mining to show that Darwin, Gould and Patterson, as well as others, were contemplating the rejection of the ToE. I showed that he based his interpretation of the quotes on incorrect assumptions.
You will also note that no creationists responded to my 'less than coherent' post.
311 posted on
10/03/2005 5:23:18 PM PDT by
b_sharp
(Science adjusts theories to fit evidence, creationism distorts evidence to fit the Bible.)
To: connectthedots
I find it interesting that only one evolutionist bothered to reply to your most detailed post; and it wasn't very coherent
Perhaps it's because we're weary of debunking the same dishonestly pulled-out-of-context quotes.
Seems to me that if you were wrong in your citations of Darwin,
You mean that dishonest out of context quote to make it seem like Darwin was doubting the possibility of the evolution of the eye, when really he wasn't?
Connectthedots, you've been on these discussion long enough; you should
know that quote is taken out of context and that any attempt to present it as an argument against evolution is founded in dishonesty or ignorance. Why are you still acting as cheerleader to someone who has done nothing but present a false definition of evolution supported with out-of-context quotes and who insults anyone who explains that his understanding of evolution is incorrect?
339 posted on
10/03/2005 6:58:38 PM PDT by
Dimensio
(http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson