Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pope Says, Jesus 'Pretends'
Fr. Ray Blake's Blog ^ | 12/2/13 | Fr. Ray Blake

Posted on 12/02/2013 7:06:42 PM PST by marshmallow

Jes·u·it·i·cal

adjective

of or pertaining to Jesuits or Jesuitism.
( often lowercase ) practicing casuistry or equivocation;
using subtle or oversubtle reasoning; crafty; sly; intriguing.

Or as the say you can take the Jesuit out of the Jesuits but not the Jesuit out of the Jesuit.

On Saturday, Radio Vatican said Pope Francis had said,

“In the Gospel, Jesus does not become angry, but pretends to when the disciples do not understand him,”

The ancient Fathers would baulk at such a suggestion, I can't think of one who would be be comfortable with the idea that the Gospels did not reveal the plain meaning of what Jesus said and did, it is only the Jesuits of the 17th century who would begin to suggest otherwise.

There is no suggestion in the Gospels that Jesus feigns, or pretends anything. On the contrary he is the 'Truth'. He says, "Let your 'yes' mean 'yes' and your 'no' mean 'no'". His Kingdom stands in contradistinction to that of the kingdom of the Father of Lies.

If Jesus really does 'pretend' to be angry but isn't really what else does he pretend? Is he really just 'acting' in other emotional responses, when he sighs, when he weeps, when he rails against the Pharisees. Is he really grinning broadly when he calls Simon Peter, 'Satan'?

I do not agree with Pope Francis on this, we do not need smiley or angry face marks to interpret the Gospels. Perhaps this says more about the Pope than it does about Jesus. Rather than Jesus pretending, is Pope Francis 'pretending'? After all if one believes the Son of God can and does 'pretend', why shouldn't the Pope? And if the Pope can 'pretend', why not the Church?

(Excerpt) Read more at marymagdalen.blogspot.com ...


TOPICS: Catholic; Evangelical Christian; Mainline Protestant; Ministry/Outreach; Theology
KEYWORDS: catholic
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 161-179 next last
To: NKP_Vet
If you’re not a Catholic what gives you the right to say anything about the Catholic Church? Criticize your own faith and clean it up.

HMMMmmm...

It appears that your second statement is not obeying your first one.

101 posted on 12/03/2013 12:28:32 PM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: metmom

http://songmeanings.com/songs/view/3458764513820548037/


102 posted on 12/03/2013 12:30:34 PM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: dangus

So either way, he still asserts that Christ was pretending to be angry. Christ deceived his Apostles.

mmmmmkay.


103 posted on 12/03/2013 1:02:58 PM PST by piusv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Arthur McGowan
A layman may think or say anything he likes about the Pope and the Pope’s pronouncements anytime the Pope is not speaking ex cathedra on dogma or morals.

Actually, the Catholic layman is required to submit his mind and will to every Papal teaching:

This religious submission of mind and will must be shown in a special way to the authentic magisterium of the Roman Pontiff, even when he is not speaking ex cathedra; that is, it must be shown in such a way that his supreme magisterium is acknowledged with reverence, the judgments made by him are sincerely adhered to, according to his manifest mind and will. His mind and will in the matter may be known either from the character of the documents, from his frequent repetition of the same doctrine, or from his manner of speaking.

DOGMATIC CONSTITUTION ON THE CHURCH LUMEN GENTIUM SOLEMNLY PROMULGATED BY HIS HOLINESS POPE PAUL VI ON NOVEMBER 21, 1964
104 posted on 12/03/2013 1:58:04 PM PST by armydoc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: armydoc

Okay. Not merely ex cathedra.

But the authentic magisterium. Not just anything he says in a homily. And the subject matter must be a matter of faith or morals, and this does not include opinions about the causes of poverty.


105 posted on 12/03/2013 2:55:16 PM PST by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: Elsie

Her body and soul is alive in heaven. Otherwise, don’t you think they would have discovered her tomb?


106 posted on 12/03/2013 3:09:07 PM PST by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: Arthur McGowan
Poverty, its causes and our responsibility to address it does not involve morals?? Also, your position puts the lay Catholic in a very curious seat of judgement over every Papal statement. Ex-cathedra? nope. Magisterial? nope. Faith/morals? nope. Result? circular file.

I find it fascinating that a Catholic could be comfortable dismissing or even ridiculing a statement by the Vicar of Christ.
107 posted on 12/03/2013 3:14:10 PM PST by armydoc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: dangus

dangus says
“That said, I am completely scandalized by the Pope’s abandonment of the principle of subsidiarity, a Catholic social doctrine which directly opposes statism.”

Maybe he hasn’t forgot subsidiarity. From the same American Thinker article quoted elsewhere:

“Pope Francis also says in the exhortation that politicians should not pander to or prey on the poor for votes, that countries with high debt are doing a disservice to the poor, and that welfare programs are not the answer to the problem of poverty. He also calls for a greater emphasis on Catholic teaching on the principle of subsidiarity, which is absolutely opposed to all forms of “collectivism.” So while Pope Francis is criticizing capitalism’s negatives, he is certainly not endorsing socialism.”


108 posted on 12/03/2013 4:13:40 PM PST by TNMountainMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: armydoc

I’m more fascinated that Catholics can continuously defend at the very least potentially heretical statements by the man who is supposed to be Pope.


109 posted on 12/03/2013 4:30:53 PM PST by piusv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: armydoc

You have a far too expansive notion of the subject matters that the magisterium of the Church can address with authority.


110 posted on 12/03/2013 4:52:45 PM PST by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: Zionist Conspirator

An overall insightful analysis.


111 posted on 12/03/2013 5:24:26 PM PST by daniel1212 (Come to the Lord Jesus as a contrite damned+destitute sinner, trust Him to save you, then live 4 Him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: smvoice

But I’ve never seen such a continual questioning of this man’s “true” meanings of what he’s said. A person simply cannot screw up that often, like EVERY time he opens his mouth. How many points is he going to be spotted before his game actually counts?


Well.....yeah....What else can be said?


112 posted on 12/03/2013 5:30:58 PM PST by chasio649
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: NKP_Vet; metmom; boatbums; caww; presently no screen name; smvoice; Greetings_Puny_Humans; ...
What evangelical “church” believes in NO ABORITON ANY KIND, FOR ANY REASON. NO WOMEN PREACHERS, AND WILL NOT ORDAIN OPENLY HOMOSEXUAL MEN.

As said, you are the one promoting a church as the supreme authority, while i am defending what i see Scripture teach. And since that is not your supreme authority, but Rome is, and you are not to objectively examine the Scriptures to ascertain the veracity of what Rome teaches, thus all you can really do is engage in argument by assertion of Rome's claims. Thats it!

I just described the Catholic Church. I defy you to tell me those morale issues are liberal. Ask the liberal media how “liberal” the Catholic Church is.

No you did not describe the Catholic Church, esp the RCC, but largely a paper one, unless you do not believe what James said, "I will shew thee my faith by my works." (Ja. 2:18) Talk is cheap, for what we really believe is shown by what we do, and what Rome effectually teaches is liberalism, from the Bible scholarship it posts right on the Vatican web site to the treatment of liberals as members in life and in death.

And I could give a rats ass about what some moron that claims to be “catholic” says he believes in.

Of course you do, since you must defend your fantasy of Rome, and deny that what you believe is shown by what you do, and what Rome shows is that liberal - her majority - are members in life and in death, even men like Teddy K, and that long as you die in her arms as a Catholic is what is most essential. Converts to conservative evangelicalism are to be attacked.

Now want to tell you all about the protestant churches that believe in sodomite “marriage”,

We censure them to, but once again, unlike you, i am not promoting such a church, which you zealously are, thus the denial, and unlike you i can leave a liberal church do joined one in which i am not a fellow member with known liberals.

Ask the liberal media how “liberal” the Catholic Church is.

Gladly:


113 posted on 12/03/2013 6:19:54 PM PST by daniel1212 (Come to the Lord Jesus as a contrite damned+destitute sinner, trust Him to save you, then live 4 Him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: daniel1212

Daniel - an excellent post that demonstrates the fallacy of RCC, as put forth on these threads. What percent of RCCs are actually Christians? Based on the broad swath of statistical evidence of a changed life, it does not appear to be many. Sadly. I wish it were otherwise. It is up to Him to open eyes and hearts.


114 posted on 12/03/2013 6:28:57 PM PST by aMorePerfectUnion (I grew up in America. I now live in the United States..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: Salvation
Her body and soul is alive in heaven. Otherwise, don’t you think they would have discovered her tomb?

No. Bones are bones. No way of telling whose they are just by looking at them and DNA testing can't prove anything.

115 posted on 12/03/2013 6:29:45 PM PST by metmom ( ...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: metmom

was everyone buried in tombs back then? even the poorest?


116 posted on 12/03/2013 6:33:23 PM PST by GeronL (Extra Large Cheesy Over-Stuffed Hobbit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: daniel1212

Wow! What telling bunch of statistics.


117 posted on 12/03/2013 6:44:47 PM PST by CynicalBear (For I decided to know nothing among you except Jesus Christ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: daniel1212

So one more time. And once more, I could give a rats ass what some skewed poll says. Not my fault that the Catholic Church is full of hypocrites (like any protestant denomination). The teachings of the Catechism of the Catholic Church is what it’s all about. Not the individual desires of anyone.

What evangelical “church” believes in NO ABORITON OF ANY KIND, FOR ANY REASON. NO WOMEN PREACHERS, AND WILL NOT ORDAIN OPENLY HOMOSEXUAL MEN.

And if you think the media that constantly blasts the Catholic Church for not ordaining women, their stance on abortion, and no homosexual clergy and no same-sex “marriage”, thinks the Catholic Church is liberal you need a reality check. Your hated of the Catholic Church clouds reality.

Lastly, ignoring the morons that call themselves Catholic and voted for Obama, the number of devout practicing Catholics that abide by their church’s teachings, voted for Romney 60% to 42 for Obama. The number of Catholics that voted for the conservative candidate dwarfs any protestant denomination in the country.

But one more thing before I go. Catholic Charities is the biggest faith based charity in the United States. And the Knights of Columbus does more than any protestant fraternal organization. Would you like for me to tell you how many Catholic hospitals there are in the United States. Catholics started the first hospitals in the country. I could go on, but I’m getting tired.


118 posted on 12/03/2013 7:04:15 PM PST by NKP_Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: daniel1212

I noticed you posted some sources but didn’t on others....hmmm. It would sure be nice if the sources could be live links.


119 posted on 12/03/2013 7:22:05 PM PST by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: daniel1212

I also noted that most of your sources were non-Catholic or even anti-Catholic. Tell me your not biased, please.


120 posted on 12/03/2013 7:22:58 PM PST by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 161-179 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson