Posted on 11/11/2019 6:39:36 PM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Concord, NH Presidential hopeful Joe Biden demonstrated his lack of basic firearms knowledge yet again on Friday, when he declared that citizens should not be able to possess a magazine with 100 clips in it.
Bidens latest baffling comment came during a campaign stop in New Hampshire.
I believe in the Second Amendment, but nobody says you can have a round a magazine with 100 clips in it! he told the cheering crowd.
100 b-bullets in it, he stammered a second later, recognizing his mistake.
Understanding basic firearms knowledge has been a struggle for Biden in the past.
During a campaign stop in Iowa in September, he called for a ban on magazines that can hold multiple bullets in them, which would essentially outlaw most handguns, The Washington Times reported.
The idea that we dont have elimination of assault-type weapons, magazines that can hold multiple bullets in them is absolutely mindless, he declared during his visit to Cedar Rapids. It is no violation of the Second Amendment. Its just a bow to the special interests of the gun manufacturers and the NRA.
Biden also demonstrated his confusion about firearms terms during a Democratic fundraiser in New York in August.
There is no rationale for us to have these assault weapons, he told the 250-member crowd, according to the Washington Examiner. Who needs a clip that can hold 100 rounds?
Presumably, Biden was attempting to refer to high capacity magazines, not the actual clips that feed magazines.
In 2013, then-Vice President Biden advocated for women including his wife to use double-barrel 12-guage shotguns for home defense instead of AR-15s.
You dont need an AR-15, he insisted, before listing off a slew of misinformation about the semiautomatic rifles.
(Excerpt) Read more at defensemaven.io ...
Please, PLEASE let this idiot be the Democrat candidate for President.
"You may mock my terminology, but my supporters know that the seriousness of the idea is the important thing. Ah, here's my limo."
The rest of you FRools can subscribe to monthly magazines with 100 clips in them.
I’ll stick with my quarterly periodicals that can hold 1,000 clips!
As I was going to St. Ives, I met a man with seven wives. Every wife had seven guns, every gun had seven mags, every mag had seven clips. Clips, mags, guns, wives, how many were going to St. Ives?
A magazine holding 100 clips would probably require a hook and ladder truck to be able to fire it. Can’t the government just ban hook and ladder trucks from civilian ownership?
(And, it should be noted, that if you're sitting there waiting your turn, their old, dogeared magazines leave a lot to be desired.)
No, no!! I meant Bomb Iran, not Idaho!
This will destroy the hair products supply publishing industry.
These jerks, and 90% of the public, do not know the difference between a clip, magazine, cartridge, bullet, primer, gun powder, shell case, brass, 1911, Glock, AR, assault weapon, Etc.
Well stated my FRiend
Half the country thinks his statement was genius.
He is pretty old.
“Stand up, Chuck! Oh, God love me, you can’t!”
Or some such.
It’s still 555-0001 (old reference).
Thank You.
I really wish that our schools would teach simple but critical history and it’s documents like they did in my day!
That was fifty years ago so I don’t have much hope!
he could get a lot of money for that, its brand new never been used..
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.