Skip to comments.
Biden Calls For Ban On Magazines That Hold '100 Clips'
Blue Lives Matter (Defense Maven) ^
| November 11, 2019
| Holly Matkin
Posted on 11/11/2019 6:39:36 PM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Concord, NH Presidential hopeful Joe Biden demonstrated his lack of basic firearms knowledge yet again on Friday, when he declared that citizens should not be able to possess a magazine with 100 clips in it.
Bidens latest baffling comment came during a campaign stop in New Hampshire.
I believe in the Second Amendment, but nobody says you can have a round a magazine with 100 clips in it! he told the cheering crowd.
100 b-bullets in it, he stammered a second later, recognizing his mistake.
Understanding basic firearms knowledge has been a struggle for Biden in the past.
During a campaign stop in Iowa in September, he called for a ban on magazines that can hold multiple bullets in them, which would essentially outlaw most handguns, The Washington Times reported.
The idea that we dont have elimination of assault-type weapons, magazines that can hold multiple bullets in them is absolutely mindless, he declared during his visit to Cedar Rapids. It is no violation of the Second Amendment. Its just a bow to the special interests of the gun manufacturers and the NRA.
Biden also demonstrated his confusion about firearms terms during a Democratic fundraiser in New York in August.
There is no rationale for us to have these assault weapons, he told the 250-member crowd, according to the Washington Examiner. Who needs a clip that can hold 100 rounds?
Presumably, Biden was attempting to refer to high capacity magazines, not the actual clips that feed magazines.
In 2013, then-Vice President Biden advocated for women including his wife to use double-barrel 12-guage shotguns for home defense instead of AR-15s.
You dont need an AR-15, he insisted, before listing off a slew of misinformation about the semiautomatic rifles.
(Excerpt) Read more at defensemaven.io ...
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Political Humor/Cartoons; Politics/Elections; US: Delaware
KEYWORDS: 2ndamendment; ar15; banglist; biden; bidengaffes; bloggers; bullets; clips; clowncar; clowncarjoe; delaware; democrats; election2020; guncontrol; joebiden; joeclowncarbiden; magazines; nra; police; rifles; rkba; secondamendment; shotguns; sidebarabuse
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-53 next last
To: 100American; 3D-JOY; abner; Abundy; AGreatPer; Albion Wilde; AliVeritas; alisasny; ...
2
posted on
11/11/2019 6:40:17 PM PST
by
Tolerance Sucks Rocks
(Show me the people who own the land, the guns and the money, and I'll show you the people in charge.)
To: bang_list
3
posted on
11/11/2019 6:40:33 PM PST
by
Tolerance Sucks Rocks
(Show me the people who own the land, the guns and the money, and I'll show you the people in charge.)
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
If pushed, I’ll give up all my magazines that hold 100 clips... but I will ONLY agree to this, if he doesn’t go after all my clips that hold 100 magazines.
4
posted on
11/11/2019 6:43:33 PM PST
by
C210N
(If you dislike productive billionaires, be 1,000 times more suspect of one confiscatory trillionaire)
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
It’s not for The Idiot Biden to decide what I need to defend myself.
His idea of firing off both barrels of a shotgun leaves one defenseless.
5
posted on
11/11/2019 6:44:03 PM PST
by
Lurkinanloomin
(Natural Born Citizens Are Born Here of Citizen Parents_Know Islam, No Peace-No Islam, Know Peace)
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Yeah, I’m for that. Imagine how heavy that would be?
6
posted on
11/11/2019 6:44:06 PM PST
by
SkyDancer
( ~ Just Consider Me A Random Fact Generator ~ Eat Sleep Fly Repeat ~)
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Oh yeah, THAT is a man you want to have in charge!
Good grief
7
posted on
11/11/2019 6:45:50 PM PST
by
McGavin999
(“Look into it” does not mean dig up dirt, it means find the truth)
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Its a reasonable request...
8
posted on
11/11/2019 6:45:51 PM PST
by
EEGator
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Then he fondled a small child and his teeth fell out.
10
posted on
11/11/2019 6:47:47 PM PST
by
The Toll
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
There is no rationale for us to have these assault weapons,Good thing this guy wasn't around in 1773.
Or was he?
11
posted on
11/11/2019 6:51:43 PM PST
by
Texas Eagle
(If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would be have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
People like Biden are either a liar or ignorant when it comes to the Constitution!
The vast majority of people who believe that the government has the right to regulate gun ownership by passing new laws ... have a poor understanding of our Constitution!
Most of the arguments about the Second Amendment ... made by both sides, revolve around a single assumption - that the Second Amendment grants a citizen the right to bear arms.
What both sides fail to understand is that the Second Amendment grants no such right, in fact, the Constitution grants no rights at all!
What the Constitution does do is identify what powers the people grant to the government.
This is the whole purpose of the Constitution - to tell the government what it can and cannot do, our Constitution is a limit on government.
That is why Marxists, Socialist, Progressive Democrats, et al. have such a disdain for our Constitution ...
It is a limitation on Government not a limitation on We The People.
Read the Second Amendment closely.
Nowhere does it state that the people have a right to bear arms but rather that the government cannot infringe on that right.
The framers of our Constitution believed that our right to bear arms is a natural right , not a right to be given to us by government.
Amendment II
A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.
Thats it, that is the whole 2nd Amendment. Where does it say that the government gives us any right? It doesnt, it only says that the government cannot infringe on this right. And when the often used argument arises that we will all be safer if we pass (another) gun law .. I am reminded on how our nations leading members at the time would respond to that ..
"No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms.
(Thomas Jefferson, Virginia Constitution, Draft 1, 1776)
"I prefer dangerous freedom over peaceful slavery".
(Thomas Jefferson, letter to James Madison, January 30, 1787)
(Put another way: I prefer the tumult of liberty to the quiet of servitude..)
Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed, as they are in almost every country in Europe. The supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword; because the whole body of the people are armed, and constitute a force superior to any band of regular troops.
(Noah Webster, An Examination of the Leading Principles of the Federal Constitution, October 10, 1787)
The Constitution shall never be construed to prevent the people of the United States who are peaceable citizens from keeping their own arms.
(Samuel Adams, Massachusetts Ratifying Convention, 1788)
There are a ton more references that can be found but the following sums it all up rather nicely ...
Today, when a concerted effort is made to obliterate this point, it cannot be repeated too often that the Constitution is a limitation on the government, not on private individuals- that it does not prescribe the conduct of private individuals, only the conduct of the government- that it is not a charter for government power, but a charter of the citizens protection against the government.
(Ayn Rand)
12
posted on
11/11/2019 6:54:01 PM PST
by
justme4now
(Falsehood flies, and the Truth comes limping after it)
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Well just about any magazine with ten pages or more, can hold up to 100 (paper) clips.
That must be what he was talking about, because nothing else makes even a smidgen of sense.
13
posted on
11/11/2019 6:54:17 PM PST
by
DoughtyOne
(Pledge: "...and to the Democracy for which it stands..." I give up. Use the democRat meme...)
To: EEGator
Wonder how many shells his double barrel holds in its magazine? Also does he know the difference between a magazine and a clip? Or double stack, single stack, or tube type? Lastly do I slide the cartridge down the barrel if its a muzzle loader? Its a good thing stupid doesnt disqualify you from breathing in Joes case. Sheesh.
14
posted on
11/11/2019 6:54:23 PM PST
by
Equine1952
(Get yourself a ticket on a common mans train of thought))
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Well, at least he’s not asking to ban weapons that can kill a person multiple times.
15
posted on
11/11/2019 6:56:48 PM PST
by
adorno
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
They won't be around much longer....
16
posted on
11/11/2019 6:57:45 PM PST
by
Cvengr
( Adversity in life & death is inevitable; Stress is optional through faith in Christ.)
To: C210N
I have a suitcase that holds a 100 clips. It also holds 100 magazines - usually Hot Rodder or Street Custom ;’}
17
posted on
11/11/2019 7:01:34 PM PST
by
rockrr
( Everything is different now...)
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Oh no Gropey Joe REALLLY means business now!
18
posted on
11/11/2019 7:03:11 PM PST
by
jmaroneps37
(Conservatism is truth. Liberalism is lies.)
To: Cvengr
Appears as though I’ll have to invest in belt-fed ‘clips’. Sure helps when a moron, surrounded by idiots, attempts to lecture the public on firearm capabilities.
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
20
posted on
11/11/2019 7:04:10 PM PST
by
DoodleBob
(Gravity's waiting period is about 9.8 m/s^s)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-53 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson