Posted on 09/22/2015 6:08:18 AM PDT by artichokegrower
The lawyer representing the man accused of killing Texas Deputy Darren GoForth said Monday that his review of evidence has led him to believe the officer was at the gas station for a rendezvous with a woman he was having an affair with.
“I believe he was not there pumping gas. I believe he went to the station to meet this young lady,” said Anthony Osso, who is representing Shannon Miles.
(Excerpt) Read more at theblaze.com ...
But you Mr. Osso are capital scum
Is there video of the alleged rendezvous? Was the cop meeting the murderer’s ho? 99% of all lawyers give the other 1% a bad name.....
Another false flag probably but even so what the hell does that have yo do with your client pumping 15 shots into him unless it was his wife he was seeing? Agree. Scum attorney using leftard distraction from the focal issue technique.
Your honor, the bag of peanuts had been misprinted ..... instead of saying PEANUTS, it said PEENUTS ........... if that bag had been spelled properly, those seventeen children might be alive today !
SO WHAT. STUPID STORY.
Shakespeare was right.
what a stupid piece, and goes to show what utter scumbags we have running saying their are lawyers and journalists.
As sad as it is to say, that excuse might actually get some traction in LA or NY, but Texas? I think it may very well backfire.
There is surveillance video of him pumping gas, there were witnesses. That's the stupidest defense ever.
I thought the client was with his momma all night.
...while reading the Bible, singing about Jesus, helping everybody, and getting ready for college.
Brother of John Edwards?
Almost certainly BS, however, what is he trying to say? Was the perp hired by his wife to take him out? Or it was OK to shoot him because he was going to have an affair? That is the defense? Don’t get it.
In urban Houston, it might work.
So who are we mad at? The lawyer who came up with this crap? The judge who will allow him to present it as evidence, however speculative and irrelevant? Or the jury that buys it?
Scum or not, this lawyer is doing what he should do for his client. I read the article on the Blaze and it is clear that the only way the scumbag can avoid the death penalty is to prove that this was going on. And before you flame me, wouldn’t you want your lawyer to do his very best for you if you were charged with a crime? For the record, if it is not true it is a cruel trick by the lawyer. But if there is evidence that points to this he has an obligation as an officer of the court to pursue it.
How did you italicize your text on FR?
Who knew that was punishable by death? /s
Put an I between these brackets <> at the beginning and end of your sentence.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.