Dinosaur DNA Research: Is the tale wagging the evidence? (Dino bone research "chillingly censored")

ACTS & FACTS ^ | October 2009 | James J. S. Johnson, Jeffrey Tomkins, and Brian Thomas

[GodGunsGuts]

Dinosaurs are a popular topic of study, whether in the public imagination or in scientific research. The scientific community, however, has a dirty little secret regarding the manner in which that research is handled. If dinosaur DNA doesn't "look like chicken" (or a crocodile), it will most likely be discarded as "unreliable data" prior to publication--and thus be effectively censored from public access.

Why? Because evolutionary scientists are committed to only publish dinosaur DNA data that match their naturalistic tale of origins. Despite the amazing discoveries of soft tissue from dinosaur bones,[1] dinosaur DNA research results (and other dinosaur "connective tissue" research) continue to be steered by evolutionary dogmatism.

Dino DNA

An article published in Science in 1993 illustrates how and why dinosaur bone research has been chillingly censored...

[MNDude]

Unlike Jurrasiac Park shows, there is no Dino DNA. It’s all been decayed or fossilized over time.

[GodGunsGuts]

Ping!

[GodGunsGuts]

Thought you might be interested in this one.

All the best—GGG

[misterrob]

Liar...

[Alamo-Girl]

Thanks for the ping!

[the_Watchman]

Whenever any kind of evidence is concealed, one immediately questions the spoliators' motives for doing so. The intuitive answer is that they dislike what the information would reveal. Therefore, to spoliate evidence suggests that the spoliators' argument or theory would be weakened, or embarrassed, by that evidence. This suggestion is so strong, forensically speaking, that it is treated as a rule of presumptive inference in law courts. In other words, if someone hides evidence in this way, the law presumes that the hidden evidence was damaging to the argument of the spoliator. The spoliator then bears the burden of proof to show otherwise.6

An interesting legal argument from this article which bears directly on the case of the birthers.

[phredo53]

Excellent photo of the species Helenus Thomasaurus.

[Louis Foxwell]

“Excellent photo of the species Helenus Thomasaurus.”
Sorry, proper latin nomenclature would be Helethomas terribulus. (or horribulus by some specieists)

[CottShop]

I read this this morning- just like hte 98% ‘similarity’ claim between chimp and human genome- the comparisons between dino and chicken protiens was HAND PICKED- ignoring evidnece that didn’t fit so that they could come to a biased conclusion- Funny hting is though that the results put the dinos more ‘similar’ to Amphibians than to chikens or Ostriches- but don’t let’s let the facts get in the way of a good story, as TV shows and news articles were very quick to tout the ‘dino-bird connection’- again, foisting a complete LIE on our kids- they KNEW they were printing a lie- but they went ahead and printed it anyways- and these evos have the gall to claim Creationists have an ‘agenda’?

[CottShop]

[[Excellent photo of the species Helenus Thomasaurus.]]

I Mistook the picture for a hadrosaur

[BushCountry]

RULE OF 48...

[GodGunsGuts]

They have already recovered all kinds of DNA from the soft tissue contained in dino bones. The question is, is it dino DNA...and this, as the article so ably points out, is what the Temple of Darwin is trying to cover up.

[GodGunsGuts]

I seriously got a chill down my spine when I read this article for the first time. Talk about corruption! I'm also quite gratified that ICR is putting together such a good team of heavy hitters, both in terms of their staff of scientists, not to mention the people they have hired to transform their work into words that the average Joe can understand. In short, it would appear that ICR is back on the ascendancy, and I for one am quite gratified by this, since they played such a huge role in the formation of the modern creationist movement.

[CottShop]

There’s been a tremendous amount of corruption in the presentation of Macroevolution, and htis corruption is taught in our schools as fact. Take hte supposed evolution of hearing for example- go to any ‘science’ book in school, and you will see a nice neat little chart, supposedly showing a nice neat little progression/movement of the jaw bone to the inner ear (supposedly). You will see skulls of water species drawn the exact same size as those of land species so that it looks like a neat little progression in similar sized skulls- but upon further research and careful exmaination- not only do supposedly millions of years seperate the ‘closest kin’, but there is a trememdous size difference too between the suppsoed ‘closest kin’- they draw a rat sized species skull the exact same size as a hippo sized skull to HIDE the fact that the supposed ‘kin’ are completely different- they make it look like there was very little difference between the two species. But mind you- this is the ‘most compelte, and best example of, evolution in action, to date’ accordign to those textbooks

As well, these books speak of how science can ‘witness evolution in action in the lab’ and they tout eukoroytes as their example, but upon further carefu lexamination- they HID the fact that the examples given were NOT one species evolving into another, as claimed, and as taught for years in school, but rather it was nothign more than a symbiotic relationship between two wholly dissimilar species- in other words, it was a parasitic invasion which developped into a symbiotic relationship where TWO seperate species thrived in conjunction with hte other- Those teaching it was ‘evolution in action’ HAD to admit finally that it is was not, and that they KNEW this all along- but taught it as fact anyways- they were caught red-handed flat out LYING to our kids- and I think you can still find textbooks making the false claim today even.

Not to mention other equally deceitful examples such as the intentionally misdrawn fetus’ development, intentional misrepresentaiton of skull fragments, misrepresentation of antibiotic resistence as ‘evolution in action’ once again- when they KNOW full well it;s nothign more than a species utilizing informaiton already present but unused- on and on it goes-

It’s funny though- watchign htem throw up their hands in feigned surprise and say ‘What? We did nothign wrong- We can’t help it if ‘mistakes’ were made- science is an ever evolving discipline where old ideas are thrown out when new info becomes available’ lol Yeah- they ‘did nothign wrong’ by intentionalyl lying and coverign up their lies (while forcing hteir lies on our kids- their motto seems to be ‘damage the kids first by feedign htem lies- then after awhile, admit ‘mistakes’ were made, but only AFTER the damage has been done)

[count-your-change]

Woodward’s paper on the dino bone dna can be found here:

DISP: Bioinformatics LabDINO DNA sequence in the BLAST web form and “BLAST” it. We will use all the default settings, so just press the format button. ...
myweb.dal.ca/js551958/Tutorial/Lab2.html

Well worth reading!

[GodGunsGuts]

I’ll check it out...thanks for the link!

[GodGunsGuts]

It cracks me up when I think about how God set up His creation such that Creationists and IDers can put the massive Temple of Darwin machine to shame on nothing more than a shoestring budget. LOL!

[count-your-change]

You might want to give a look at the link I provided before making flat statements on the subject.

[xcamel]

...Lest ye be branded a HERITIC!