Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rapid Acceleration in Human Evolution Described
Reuters ^ | Dec 10, 2007 | Will Dunham

Posted on 12/11/2007 12:34:37 AM PST by anymouse

Human evolution has been moving at breakneck speed in the past several thousand years, far from plodding along as some scientists had thought, researchers said on Monday.

In fact, people today are genetically more different from people living 5,000 years ago than those humans were different from the Neanderthals who vanished 30,000 years ago, according to anthropologist John Hawks of the University of Wisconsin.

The genetic changes have related to numerous different human characteristics, the researchers said.

Many of the recent genetic changes reflect differences in the human diet brought on by agriculture, as well as resistance to epidemic diseases that became mass killers following the growth of human civilizations, the researchers said.

For example, Africans have new genes providing resistance to malaria. In Europeans, there is a gene that makes them better able to digest milk as adults. In Asians, there is a gene that makes ear wax more dry.

The changes have been driven by the colossal growth in the human population -- from a few million to 6.5 billion in the past 10,000 years -- with people moving into new environments to which they needed to adapt, added Henry Harpending, a University of Utah anthropologist.

"The central finding is that human evolution is happening very fast -- faster than any of us thought," Harpending said in a telephone interview.

"Most of the acceleration is in the last 10,000 years, basically corresponding to population growth after agriculture is invented," Hawks said in a telephone interview.

The research appears in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

FAVORABLE GENE MUTATIONS

The researchers looked for the appearance of favorable gene mutations over the past 80,000 years of human history by analyzing voluminous DNA information on 270 people from different populations worldwide.

Data from this International HapMap Project, short for haplotype mapping, offered essentially a catalogue of genetic differences and similarities in people alive today.

Looking at such data, scientists can ascertain how recently a given genetic change appeared in the genome and then can plot the pace of such change into the distant past.

Beneficial genetic changes have appeared at a rate roughly 100 times higher in the past 5,000 years than at any previous period of human evolution, the researchers determined. They added that about 7 percent of human genes are undergoing rapid, relatively recent evolution.

Even with these changes, however, human DNA remains more than 99 percent identical, the researchers noted.

Harpending said the genetic evidence shows that people worldwide have been getting less similar rather than more similar due to the relatively recent genetic changes.

Genes have evolved relatively quickly in Africa, Asia and Europe but almost all of the changes have been unique to their corner of the world. This is the case, he said, because since humans dispersed from Africa to other parts of the world about 40,000 years ago, there has not been much flow of genes between the regions.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Technical
KEYWORDS: evolution; genetics; godsgravesglyphs; intellegentdesign; misspelledkeyword; science
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last
To: rbg81
“successful” among us see little or no pressure to reproduce.

Well, you are still allowed to contribute to the gene pool. So, find a partner and get busy!

41 posted on 12/11/2007 7:31:22 AM PST by Rudder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Rummenigge
the less you understand the more of a higher creature is necessary for explanation.

And the more we learn the more we understand it isn't nearly as simple as the naturalists would have had us to believe.
For since the creation of the world His invisible attributes, His eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly seen, being understood through what has been made, so that they are without excuse.
- Romans 1:20

42 posted on 12/11/2007 7:32:34 AM PST by Sopater (A wise man's heart inclines him to the right, but a fool's heart to the left. ~ Ecclesiastes 10:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

Human Evolution Seems to Be Accelerating
(Jews evolved from “financing!”)
AP via Fox News | 12-11-07
Posted on 12/11/2007 11:28:45 AM EST by squireofgothos
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1937908/posts


43 posted on 12/11/2007 10:48:18 AM PST by SunkenCiv (Profile updated Monday, December 10, 2007____________________https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah; Rudder; Arthur McGowan; From many - one.; RobbyS
Rudder said: Nope. It's still selective pressure and selection, no matter who or what changes the environment. And we human beings are no less "natural" than any other organism on the planet.

Actually, "natural selection" means the "best" mutations survive. So while man in certainly natural, human intervention is unnatural select as it allows genes to survive that are not among the best.

Arthur McGowan said: Since medicine has made ANY difference to survival only since 1920, and a great difference only since about 1940, that leaves more than 10,000 years of civilization in which crowding, new diseases, etc., have introduced greater natural selection effects, not less.

I did wonder about this. Certainly the most short circuiting of natural selection has been in the last 100 years or so. But in that case the story should have been that human evolution WAS faster than previously thought. [BTW, even 100 years ago, people with a genetic disposition to take risks that would lead to say the loss of a limb were able to live when they would not likely have lived long nor reproduced as much in raw nature.]

From many - one. said: That apparent short circuiting also allows mutations to survive that may weaken the individual in some areas, yet strengthen them in others. IOW the gene pool is getting bigger.

Actually, I pointed out decades ago to a leftist environmental economist, if maximizing genes is your greatest value, nuclear power plant accidents if not nuclear war are great events as they create more genes. [It was his highest value and he did not care for this point.] But natural selection and evolution are NOT about maximizing the number of genes out there. Evolution is about natural selection and evolution allowing organisms to adapt to their environment that might even be changing.

I have no problem with evolving traits in organisms. I have no problem with the mechanism of natural selection. I am neutral in this debate. But as I said, if as the mechanism, natural selection, is being short-circuited, change in mankind, ie evolution, has sped up, someone has some explaining to do and really needs a new theory or mechanism or both.
44 posted on 12/11/2007 10:52:18 AM PST by JLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: exDemMom

So, the 7 per cent figure is the fraction of the 1 per cent figure that is not totally identical?


45 posted on 12/11/2007 10:59:11 AM PST by SunkenCiv (Profile updated Monday, December 10, 2007____________________https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Does so

“(I’m SO smart after morning coffee).”

That’s interesting. I’m smarter and funnier after tequila, and tougher, and a better dancer ...


46 posted on 12/11/2007 10:59:44 AM PST by live+let_live
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: JLS
Simple solution ~ your DNA strands are full of tiny machines, some of which are supercomputers that far exceed anything we have yet built.

With the ascendancy of messenger RNA, it would seem to be possible for your genome (plus its supporting machinery) to go about the business of rewriting code in order to "adapt" just about as fast as it pleased.

You and I might not agree with the results every time, but we've all had software contractors like that ~

47 posted on 12/11/2007 11:24:06 AM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

Genes are found along DNA strands. 7% of genes could be rapidly changing with little change in aggregate DNA content. Besides, not all your DNA is composed of genes ~


48 posted on 12/11/2007 11:27:10 AM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: CarrotAndStick

The more science teaches us about ourselves, the more we see that a higher power has shaped us into what we are.

How did you infer that?


Where do ideas come from? Sometimes, we believe they are God-given. You look at the idea and say “How could I have thought of that?” The famous examples of Kekule’s dream of a snake eating its own tail leading to a fundamental discovery in organic chemistry, Tesla’s flash of insight into how to make what became known as an AC motor. Einstein’s leap into relativity, and many more “dis-joint” ideas are tempting to regard as some form of divine intervention.

His argument though is probably more complicated than that. The notion of God-given insights is just the starting point for a whole body of notions about divine guidance. But, there is the old saying, Man Proposes, God Disposes, in Yiddish, Man Thinks, God Laughs.


49 posted on 12/11/2007 11:30:50 AM PST by bioqubit (bioqubit, conformity - such a common deformity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: damondonion

How about an ability to rapidly identify and expel common poisonous substances ~ that’s pretty new.


50 posted on 12/11/2007 11:31:31 AM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: CarrotAndStick

Most of the significant evolutionary pressures concern diseases, both inherited and acquired. Even the dumbest idiot is usually provided some sort of charity/hand-out in most societies. Intelligence needn’t necessarily be a force for evolution as much as the other factors are, in modern human beings. An exception to this would be among small groups of people living nomadic lifestyles, where the size of the group is too small for members to be able to compensate for the shortcomings of other members.


That’s fine, but the problem I have is the fetishtic focus on DNA, without discussion of the influence of methylation, and epigenetics. How these “evolve”, mutate, or get selected by cultural changes in diet, and other matters is a huge scientific void.


51 posted on 12/11/2007 11:33:58 AM PST by bioqubit (bioqubit, conformity - such a common deformity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Erasmus

Alas, run of the mill Japanese girls are NOT keeping up with the Japanese royal family (who compete nicely with Bavarian girls every single time). Still, in general, they are larger these days.


52 posted on 12/11/2007 11:34:41 AM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
“the Japanese royal family (who compete nicely with Bavarian girls every single time)”

This says more about me than you but, are you describing bosoms or the ability to consume dark beer?

53 posted on 12/11/2007 11:43:00 AM PST by live+let_live
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: JLS
Evolutionism heavily emphasizes randomness and accident and ignores intelligence of any sort, whether divine or human. Ironically, it has always glorified the powerful, who in their pride do not hesitate to bend nature to their will.
54 posted on 12/11/2007 11:48:50 AM PST by RobbyS ( CHIRHO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: live+let_live

They drink rice wine ~ so it’s not the beer part eh.


55 posted on 12/11/2007 12:10:10 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Mojohemi
"...How many times have the continents broken up and divided again and again...?"

Within the last 350,000 years?

None.

56 posted on 12/11/2007 3:29:46 PM PST by Does so (...against all enemies, DOMESTIC and foreign...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

I must be an Eskimo! Cool.... ;)
susie


57 posted on 12/11/2007 5:14:52 PM PST by brytlea (amnesty--an act of clemency by an authority by which pardon is granted esp. to a group of individual)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: anymouse
Such rapid "evolution" (/sarcasm) for there to be any changes within a species.
58 posted on 12/11/2007 5:16:12 PM PST by unspun (God save us from egos -- especially our own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bioqubit

And it’s a void that’s only going to get bigger when they discover that homosexuality can be UNDONE (through reverse methylation).


59 posted on 12/11/2007 6:03:55 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv
So, the 7 per cent figure is the fraction of the 1 per cent figure that is not totally identical?

More or less.

It doesn't take a 7% change in nucleotide composition to completely change a gene; a single nucleotide change in a 2400 base pair long coding sequence can drastically alter the function of the protein product.

60 posted on 12/12/2007 4:19:04 AM PST by exDemMom (Now that I've finally accepted that I'm living a bad hair life, I'm more at peace with the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson