Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The scourge from nowhere
Dawn ^ | 9 April, 2005 | Dawn

Posted on 04/08/2005 9:17:07 PM PDT by CarrotAndStick

Nearly a thousand years after his death, the name of Genghis Khan still reverberates down the ages. Scourge of the known world, he sprang out of nowhere to bring death and destruction.

For the world of Islam in particular, the Mongol onslaught was a veritable holocaust. From Bukhara to Baghdad, Genghis laid waste to flowering cities and prosperous countries. Operating on the principle of "surrender and live; or resist and die", he and his generals led his ravening hordes in unceasing campaigns from Beijing to Budapest.

Even after his death, his successors carried on his mission to bring all mankind under Mongol rule. Western Europe was fortunate in that a possible dispute over succession prompted the Mongol hordes to return to their steppes and grasslands as suddenly as they had appeared.

In 1995, the Washington Post proclaimed Genghis Khan as 'the most important man in the last thousand years' because he led a single species to dominate the entire known world.

His conquests made one nation aware of the existence of other remote countries. They 'realigned the world's major religions, influenced art, established new trade patterns. The effects remain as keystones in Eurasian history.' But for the world of Islam, Genghis Khan's coming was nothing short of apocalyptic. Until he and his successors traumatized much of the Middle East, Damascus and Baghdad were at the cutting edge of science, philosophy and the arts. Travellers went there to learn at the feet of renowned scholars. The refined products of the Arab world were avidly sought after by western kings and queens.

The Mongol invasion brought this civilization to a premature end. With the destruction of libraries and laboratories and the slaughter of thinkers and scientists, the great progress the Muslims had made was halted. Many believed that the irruption of the Mongols was caused by the wrath of God.

A wave of reaction set in as science and philosophy were discouraged, if not altogether prohibited. The orthodox claimed that the disaster was caused because Muslims had turned away from the literal words of the Holy Scriptures.

Indeed, it can be argued that the Arab world went into a decline from which it has still not recovered. Muslim Spain escaped the holocaust and continued to thrive for some while still.

When Ottoman Turkey rose to power, it absorbed vast swathes of Arab territory from Makkah to the Maghreb into its empire. In the East, the Moghul Empire rose, again under a Central Asian tribe.

Since the Ottomans conquered them, most Arab nations have seen their borders drawn and redrawn by foreign powers, their leaders imposed on them and their resources plundered. Small wonder they are confused by and angry about being constantly exploited by an avaricious and incompetent leadership.

Now, as this frustration and dissatisfaction expresses itself in extremism and terrorism, people like Osama bin Laden talk of the Americans as 'crusaders'. A comparison with the Mongol hordes would be more appropriate.

Now, as then, Muslims blame a perceived deviation from God's commandments as the cause of their plight. They do not see that they are weak because of ignorance and their refusal to master science and technology.

Genghis Khan learned the use of gunpowder and siege-busting weaponry from the Chinese after he had engaged them in prolonged warfare. And while maintaining the mobility of his fast-moving cavalry, he integrated this new technology into his tactics.

Who was he, this vision of hell for the civilized world of the period? To this day, Genghis Khan's birth place and grave have not been located. When he died in 1227, his inner circle kept his death a secret to prevent the disintegration of his vast empire.

They buried him quietly, according to his wishes. His descendants and his generals took over various territories as he had wished them to. For the period, it was a remarkably smooth transition, and the lack of fratricidal strife allowed the momentum created by the Great Khan to carry the expansion of the empire forward.

To learn more about this illiterate but wise ruler, you could do no better than read John Man's new biography "Genghis Khan: Life, Death and Resurrection". Simultaneously, a travel book about the wild steppes and grasslands from where Genghis sprang, it is also a marvellous history of the Mongol people.

Relying heavily on 'The Secret History of the Mongols', a work the author thinks was commissioned by Genghis as well as supervised by him, The author has visited many of the remote places the Great Khan was reputed to have been in. On his travels, he comes across strange customs and fascinating people.

On this journey to one of the least known parts of the world, you learn, among other things, how to cook a marmot. (You skin it; sew up the holes in the skin after stuffing it with pieces of the animals together with hot stones; and blast the outer fur with an acetylene torch).

Genghis Khan was raised by his mother when he lost his father at a young age, and struggled to survive in a region where tribal rivalries were rife. Gradually, using his courage and his cunning, he built up a network of loyalties among the local tribes. In a series of battles, he strengthened his hold over his people and then burst out eastward, to capture large parts of China.

He then turned his attention to the West, and sent his generals in an extended raid into Russia and Eastern Europe. Nation after nation fell before the Mongol cavalry.

A Georgian queen, having been asked by the Pope to send help for the current crusade, wrote in her letter of apology: "A savage people of Tatars, hellish of aspect, as voracious as wolves in their hunger for spoils, and as brave as lions, have invaded my country..."

According to contemporary sources cited, Genghis Khan had a special grudge against Muslims: his envoys to King Mohammed of the Muslim Central Asian state of Khwarezm were killed when they brought proposals for trade and good relations.

The Great Khan was furious, and according to his Persian historian Juvaini, 'flew into a whirlwind of rage, the fire of wrath driving the water from his eyes so that it was only to be quenched in blood.'

According to the Secret History, Genghis Khan proclaimed: "Let us ride out against the Islamic people, to gain vengeance!" The current state of confusion in the Muslim world is a measure of his success.


TOPICS: Editorial; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: archaeology; gengiskhan; ggg; godsgravesglyphs; history; india; islam; muslim; west
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 next last
According to contemporary sources cited, Genghis Khan had a special grudge against Muslims: his envoys to King Mohammed of the Muslim Central Asian state of Khwarezm were killed when they brought proposals for trade and good relations.

So, more proof of the Muslims being ruthlessly uncivilised even at their 'Golden Age'?

1 posted on 04/08/2005 9:17:08 PM PDT by CarrotAndStick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: CarrotAndStick

Shouldn't that be Jenjis ?


2 posted on 04/08/2005 9:23:23 PM PDT by stylin19a (Always remember - don't ever forget - "2 wrongs don't make a right, it's 3 lefts that make a right.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CarrotAndStick

Moonbat analysis--I doubt the Wash Post called the Mongols "a species". I am certain that this is yet a way to blame someone else for the pitiful state of Islamic nations today. Eastern Europe was overrun by the Mongols--they made it to the gates of Vienna and they still made it into the 21st century, didn't they?


3 posted on 04/08/2005 9:24:10 PM PDT by the Real fifi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CarrotAndStick
Genghis Khan as 'the most important man in the last thousand years' because he led a single species to dominate the entire known world.

So the Pakis consider Mongols a different 'species'. I guess they think that of blacks as well.
4 posted on 04/08/2005 9:25:27 PM PDT by Cronos (Never forget 9/11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CarrotAndStick
I think we should put Khan in charge of the war on terror (whatcha bet he'd protect our borders?).
5 posted on 04/08/2005 9:26:43 PM PDT by Founding Father (Another pearl of wisdom from my imaginary mind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: the Real fifi
Two or three different events at many centuries remove are confounded in a single paragraph there ~ Turks and Mongols are "different".

Still, the Mongols brought about the destruction of Arab rule in the Middle East.

6 posted on 04/08/2005 9:33:12 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: the Real fifi
I think the term 'species' refers to human beings, and not only the Mongols. For the time, and until the British Empire, the Mongol Empire was the largest for several centuries. All those lands were under Mongol control.


7 posted on 04/08/2005 9:33:25 PM PDT by CarrotAndStick (The articles posted by me needn't necessarily reflect my opinion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: CarrotAndStick

8 posted on 04/08/2005 9:42:02 PM PDT by CarrotAndStick (The articles posted by me needn't necessarily reflect my opinion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

Yes*blush* But it is true the Mongols conquered most of Easrern Europe--west of Kiev (not quite to Vienna) but close..and still that part of the world did not devolve afterwards to what Moslem lands did.


9 posted on 04/08/2005 9:43:08 PM PDT by the Real fifi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: the Real fifi

Where did Attila the Hun come in? Were Huns also Mongols?


10 posted on 04/08/2005 9:44:08 PM PDT by keithtoo (Kennedy - he's of Irish extraction, but under the influence of Scotch most of the time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: CarrotAndStick
Now, as this frustration and dissatisfaction expresses itself in extremism and terrorism, people like Osama bin Laden talk of the Americans as 'crusaders'. A comparison with the Mongol hordes would be more appropriate.

/Roll eyes

When we kill several million Arabs for the fun of it, you let us know...ok?

I also notice no mention of the fact that most of the Mongols coverted to Islam, and continued to slaughter their way across Eurasia.
11 posted on 04/08/2005 9:45:05 PM PDT by swilhelm73 (Appeasers believe that if you keep on throwing steaks to a tiger, the tiger will become a vegetarian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: the Real fifi
Actually, in conquering Eastern Europe the Mongols were dealing with people not much different than the more primitive tribes to the North of Mongolia.

They were not highly motivated to keep their hands on the place since it would require substantial investment to bring about a return in trade sufficient to overcome the cost of the conquest. If anything, the Mongols thought about Eastern Europe pretty much the way we, today, think of North Korea.

Your supposition that Eastern Europe didn't suffer to the degree found in Arabia presumed some sort of equality of condition.

There was no such equality. You would have much preferred Baghdad as a hometown even after the Mongol conquest.

The Mongols made normal trade arrangements with the portions of the West that could provide them with furs and dried fish, or which had already had a longstanding relationship with Mongol interests. These places include Hungary, Estonia and Finland (all of which ended up adopting an Uralic-Altaic language as their own).

12 posted on 04/08/2005 9:52:53 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: swilhelm73

Actually I posted this simply because I found it interesting. I had thought all along that Genghis Khan was a Muslim. I wonder who converted the Mongols to Islam, and when.


13 posted on 04/08/2005 9:53:06 PM PDT by CarrotAndStick (The articles posted by me needn't necessarily reflect my opinion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: keithtoo
The Huns were from China proper. The Emperor kicked them out. They moved West ~ slowly. By the time they reached Europe they were "white folk".

Look at the Huns more like a cultural movement than a tribal relocation.

14 posted on 04/08/2005 9:54:27 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

Isn't it known that the language spoken in Turkey has similar words to those languages spoken in China and Korea?


15 posted on 04/08/2005 9:55:57 PM PDT by CarrotAndStick (The articles posted by me needn't necessarily reflect my opinion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: swilhelm73

The "golden age" of muslim accomplishments is greatly overrated. They are, and always have been, an inferior society.


16 posted on 04/08/2005 9:56:15 PM PDT by ReadyNow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: swilhelm73
Mongols tended to adopt whatever religion was dominant in the conquered area. They started out as animists in their homeland. Today they are mostly Buddhist.

If Islamic missionaries had not gotten to them before they moved into the Middle East the carnage and destruction would have been far greater.

17 posted on 04/08/2005 9:56:19 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: CarrotAndStick
The Turkish language is a member of the Uralic-Altaic family of languages. These have several major subdivisions, one of which is Finno-Ughric ~ today represented primarily by Finish and Estonian.

Other members include several spoken in Tibet, modern Mongolian, Korean, Manchu, a number of languages in Central Asia South of Mongolia, and an element in Japanese (more than offset with a Polynesia or Austronesian component).

If you want to learn these languages you can attend Indiana University.

18 posted on 04/08/2005 10:00:23 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: swilhelm73

An of course, this is from a Pakistani newspaper. Just an injection of false bravado and jingoism to keep the country's Islam-based nationalism rejuvenated. No Pakistani journalist would miss the chance to omit the misleading phrases like 'Glory of Islam', 'Golden Age', 'Advanced Muslim civilisation' etc.


19 posted on 04/08/2005 10:01:13 PM PDT by CarrotAndStick (The articles posted by me needn't necessarily reflect my opinion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

Thanks for the information. Are you learned in any of those languages? Are any of those languages spoken in India?


20 posted on 04/08/2005 10:02:24 PM PDT by CarrotAndStick (The articles posted by me needn't necessarily reflect my opinion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson