Posted on 05/15/2020 8:11:11 PM PDT by rlmorel
Folks, this seems to me the only thing that fits. This is a lot to follow, but we aren't likely to get a Perry Mason-like confession from these people. They are tripping up, and one of these trips is going to get them.
Thoughts on this?
The link to the article is: https://www.theepochtimes.com/flynns-name-never-masked-in-call-transcripts-briefed-to-obama-records-indicate_3350021.html
I listened to his show today and think he is spot on!!!
ping
I knew that several years ago. 85% of government employees are Democrat, and of course that snake appointed a bunch of his toady rotten apples into positions that it is hard to get them out of.
Obama just made corrupt Washington more corrupt and more arrogant.
Yeah, a lot of us assumed that, but getting proof was a challenge. I think it is coming apart for them.
I thought Dan made a reasonable case today, but even if this case is proven most of American will either not understand what happened or even care.
In the age of Google, Facebook, and other tech giants it seems like much of the country has no problem with being monitored by others for any purpose.
Sobering. It fits the “memo to nowhere” on the morning Trump was inaugurated that “We followed the book.”
Yes...I am surprised there aren’t more pings to his content on here. He is a bit repetitive, but I am in favor of that because otherwise, it is difficult to follow sometimes.
I really like listening to him. Mark Levin is pretty spot on as well, but I have a hard time listening to him because I am already angry about a lot of those subjects, and his anger nearly brings my blood pressure right up there with him.
Dan can be pretty funny sometimes...:)
Dan did make a mistake today that was important. If I heard him correctly and I listen while driving to and from work in between phone calls, he said Strozk failed to close the case.
That was not true. It was a Washington Field Office and not the 7th floor that had the open CI case against Flynn. They had determined that there was no crime and they were going to close the case. Strozk found out the case against Flynn was still open and had not yet been closed and he directed the supervisor there to NOT close the case and later texted that the “7th floor was involved.”
I think that is worse than if the 7th floor had an open case and as Dan says, “precision matters”.
I will say, I am willing to give up a cell phone if this new 6666 bill passes.
But I get your point.
That said, we have to try. If this doesn’t go anywhere, and people don’t get punished, our country is sunk. It may be sunk anyway at least for the rest of my life, however long that turns out to be if more of the coronavirus bills pass.
Everything Obama has done in his eight years as President belies the notion that he had no involvement with Blago over the Senate seat controversy that sent the governor to prison and destroyed the Jesse Jackson family.
Patrick Fitzgerald was called in to cover up for Obama before he took office, and Robert Mueller was called in to cover up for Obama after he left office.
-PJ
Just finished listening to todays Bongino Podcast.
Unreal. YOU MUST listen.
I cannot not explain the details, as I am not as gifted as others in
explaining things.
I will say that Bongino makes a compelling case that Obama ordered
the hit on Flynn. And I dont mean Obama just knew about it, BUT
ORDERED the hit.
If you listen and after you listen it might explain why Emmet Sullivan
has been railroading Flynn, especially with his last illegal ruling.
It also might explain why Brennan made that strange tweet about
hoping Chris Wray, FBI Director stays strong. Which I believe is a hidden
message to Wray.
You must listen to Bonginos show today.
And thanks for posting this thread. I think the doors are about to bust open.
I agree 100%. I have been very surprised that more people are not upset with the massive surveillance state we have allowed to gain power without impediment.
Then I think of how much of our privacy we all surrender by plugging into the internet and using big tech software and search engines. I think people know this and most just shrug.
This is/was Watergate x 1000. I think we have no clue or idea just how bad it was and we may never know.
Dan does a good job by & large.
I didn’t catch that, but I don’t really see that as all that bad. I believe Bongino speaks extemporaneously, and I know he gets a lot of tiny details wrong, most of the time he seems to catch himself before it gets set in cement!
But I do believe he gets the larger points right. There is a LOT of information he puts out. And he backs it up.
And he did say “This hasn’t been proven”.
But I will say...it sure fits better than anything else I have heard. It has been a bit of a puzzle to me when that unmasking list came out, because that occurred to me right away-that there was no unmasking request between 12/29 (The Call) and 1/4 (The day before the meeting where Strzok called off the dogs who were going to close out the case)
Heh...exactly! I remember watching that show...
I will say-I have been willing to be patient in how all this unfolds. Probably most people don’t remember, but I remember back in 1972-1974 when the whole Watergate thing was going down.
It didn’t just happen. There was a steady, constant for two years, drip-drip-drip of the thing going on, then near the end it really started to take off.
But this is taking far longer than I thought it would to see SOMEONE take a hit on it.
So Obama did it...but it's legal?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.