Posted on 03/27/2016 10:48:23 AM PDT by abigkahuna
...TRUMP: Totally. I had nothing to do with the campaign had nothing to do with it. Hes got a problem with The National Enquirer. I have no control over The National Enquirer. I had no idea about the story. I just got it last night. I had nothing to do whatsoever with The National Enquirer, neither did the campaign. For him to say I had to do with it, try and put the shoe on the other foot is disgraceful. And by the way, Hes the one that started it. From what I hear, he and his campaign went out and bought the cover shoot. Melania did a cover shoot for GQ a very strong modeling picture. No big deal. But it was a cover shoot for GQ a big magazine. And it was, you know, fine and, if from what I hear, he was the one, or his campaign bought the rights and give it to the super PAC. That super PAC is friendly to Ted Cruz. He started it. I didnt.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
From what I’ve read everyone that meets her likes her.
As I said this idiot's "privacy concern" is simply laughable.
The guy's is probably contemplating something like the equivalent of a witness protection program as we speak.
FReegards!
I wish Trump had posted this picture instead of the one he did.
That would be a fundamental flaw. Well, can’t say I didn’t try to think well of Cruz, I just didn’t succeed in doing so.
I have to laugh at you and your idiotic comparison of a mother watching someone’s kids
and a photo of two politicians
Gingrich publicly posing himself as being political alliance with Pelosi
you know Palin is aligned with Trump now
so why don’t you Cruzer save a few bucks and start recycling those old left-wing hack attack photos of Palin son Trig?
sounds like it’d be about just your speed
Nice dodge but completely dishonest.
so why dont you Cruzer save a few bucks and start recycling those old left-wing hack attack photos of Palin son Trig?
sounds like itd be about just your speed
Missed again.
There is yet to be one iota of evidence that links Ted Cruz to it, that’s why I quite clearly said EVEN IF IT WERE TRUE. And just to walk you through the logic, which was also quite clear, nobody ‘went after’ Trump’s wife. She is a model. She has had her naked pictures published for everyone to see, unlike Heidi Cruz. So, basically your buddy Trump is upset that a PAC that opposes him posted the TRUTH.
And no, Cruz has not been ‘wallowing in the sleaze’. Give me one example of that BS.
Who knows, but you certainly haven’t proving anything.
I saw the pictures long ago, before any of this faux scandal, so if it is even illegal, many people not connected to Ted Cruz are guilty.
They really love Newt right now, in fact many of them say he would make a good VP. Of course, he and the Donald do have a lot in common. Three wives, adultery, and they both like Nancy Pelosi.
Everyone who watched Barbara Walter’s special on the Trump family knew about the pics. The showed the cover on the show.
One thing about all of this is, it reminds me of why political spouses are important to look at. Trump has had a few wives, but all of them look a good deal happier and less snarly than Mrs. Cruz does, and they aren’t evil bankers who plot ways to cede us with Mexico and Canada!
It's not like she had sex on video and then made a commercial for the Canadian.
That is where you are wrong. There is a connection to Cruz.
Of course not, thats how Ted rolls. Ask Dr. Carson about Iowa. See, Ted has his purveyor of sleeze, Jeff Roe, do his dirty work. Then, like a the girly man he is, feigns innocence. Of course he apologies much later, after the damage is done. There has been several posts saying that Jeff Roe purchased the pictures. Somebody had to pay for them before they were put in the ad.
And once again, it is wrong to go after candidates wifes. Implying that Melina Trump is a slut and that you should vote for Cruz because of that is flat out sleezy. And yet, it took over a day for Ted to say that the ad was wrong, only after being prodded by a reporter and after getting enough time to play the victim. If you think its fair to talk about the candidates wifes, perhaps you would have no problem with Heidi Cruz and the CFR, or even dabbling into her "episode". Of course, the ends justify the means, right? He's losing and needs over 85% of the remaining votes to get to 1237 and anything goes?
GQ must hate Trump in order to do this without having a care for Melania. I guess GQ is looking to go the way of Macy’s and Fox’s ratings.
On purpose
The issue was whether Cruz would get to 50% for all the delegates. The ad was an attempt to pick up the last few percentage points needed for that to occur.
"Intellectual" is as intellectual does. Well, OK. Let's leave it at that. Not a big deal.
On the other hand, Melania's picture was on the cover of this bleeping magazine and yet we gotta be concerned about her privacy?
What's the world coming to? Give me a break.
Aha! That outcome just proves how crafty and diabolical this guy Cruz is. The fact that there will never be any evidence clearly demonstrates the effectiveness of this con artist's ability to stage a cover-up.
Welcome to the new world of Trumpistic logic!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.