Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why are FReepers rallying around a crony socialist?

Posted on 12/24/2015 7:07:28 AM PST by dangus

Donald Trump has an excuse for funding Hillary Clinton's election to the U.S. Senate from New York: That's how crony socialism is done. You pay off elected officials to become their crony, then you get special consideration for your real estate deals. Please FReepers, explain to me how this isn't precisely what we are trying to STOP in Washington? Do you know what I don't hear coming from Trump? "I'm going to put an end to such games." Rather, it seems like he is proud of how he has played the game, considers it is how he rose to the top, and in his generous self-appraisal, figures that anything that helped him make more of his billions must be good.

He also favors socialized medicine. Not just a mandated level of services (Obamacare), but the government paying for universal, single-payer health care. This isn't an opinion from 2000. This is from his current campaign:

Scott Pelley: How do you fix it?

Donald Trump: There’s many different ways, by the way. Everybody’s got to be covered. This is an un-Republican thing for me to say because a lot of times they say, “No, no, the lower 25 percent that can’t afford private. But–”

Scott Pelley: Universal health care.

Donald Trump: I am going to take care of everybody. I don’t care if it costs me votes or not. Everybody’s going to be taken care of much better than they’re taken care of now.

Scott Pelley: The uninsured person is going to be taken care of. How? How?

Donald Trump: They’re going to be taken care of. I would make a deal with existing hospitals to take care of people. And, you know what, if this is probably–

Scott Pelley: Make a deal? Who pays for it?

Donald Trump: –the government’s gonna pay for it.

Trump isn't a conservative. He's a narcissist who can't help telling the crowds what he thinks they want to hear. And so what we get in the Republican debates is an unelectable charicature of conservatism. One moment he's for keeping all Muslims out; the next he's only for keeping Islamofascists out. Well, duh. One moment, he's against the invasion of America by millions of communist Chinese and socialist Mexicans, the next, he's endorsing touchback amnesty.

Wait... you didn't know Trump favors granting citizenship to just about any red Chinese or Mexican who asks for it? "We have a lot of good people, they’ve been here and they've done a good job. It’s a tough situation and in some cases they haven’t been good people, and there have been some problems. The good ones we’ll expedite."

That's right... he's going to expedite illegal aliens already in the United States so that they can come right back into the United States.

Building a wall and then expediting illegal aliens in a touchback amnesty might help solve the security risks of uncontrolled illegal aliens, but how exactly are we going to simultaneously "expedite" them and screen them for terrorist connections? More than that, the fear that there might be terrorists among illegal aliens is one of the relatively minor issues I have with illegal aliens. I don't want my country invaded by Red Chinese and Mexican Reconquistadoras, driving down wages and consuming far more government services that they pay for.

But then we come to the issue that will make Donald Trump utterly, totally, completely unelectable. Unlike most socialists, Trump believes that American middle-class wages are too high. He has said this at almost every debate, and no rival or moderator has called him out on it. But with the Republicans already having a tough sell with Romney's legendary 47% who live off the government, can Republicans tell the vast majority of the remainder of Americans, "Oh, by the way, we'd be happy if you had way less money?"

Please, people, don't be like that Democrat socialite who couldn't believe Nixon won because she didn't know anyone who voted Republican. Trump is getting 96% of the coverage of Republican candidates, so he is who everyone is talking about. But don't confuse the volume of attention with electability. In a head-to-head poll matchup, Trump loses to Bernie Sanders in a landslide.

I've always thought the mainstream Republicans were fools to refuse to stand up for conservative values in the hope of winning an election. It's not just about watering down your beliefs to win over the middle; it's about giving people in the middle reason to think you'll do something about the conservative concerns they do have, and giving the base a reason to come out to vote. But is nominating someone who makes 58% of Americans think he is just an obnoxious blowhard the solution?

Please, if you think I'm an idiot, don't just tell me I'm an idiot. Tell me where you think I'm wrong. Tell me why you don't believe Trump won't pass a touchback amnesty into law, or won't institute socialized medicine. Show me data to say how he has a prayer of winning. I really do want a reason to believe that we're not about piss away our best chance at electing a conservative president since Ronald Reagan.


TOPICS: Philosophy; Politics/Elections; US: New York; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: 2016election; cruzbotvanity; cruzcandadian; election2016; fino; idiot; lame; moron; newyork; tds; thegreatintender; trump; trumpnotownedbypacs; vanity; yawn
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 321-326 next last
To: Pravious

Yup. He sounds like he’s reading off a teleprompter even though he doesn’t have one. And that comes across as ‘false’.

That’s why Trump supporters keep saying that ‘he’s telling it like it is,’ and ‘I believe him’. Speaking off the cuff comes across as more honest.


221 posted on 12/24/2015 10:34:26 AM PST by Marie (Hey GOP... The vulgarians are at the gate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 218 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
Well, Laz A. Mataz is my real name.

picture

222 posted on 12/24/2015 10:35:22 AM PST by kiryandil ("When Muslims in the White House are outlawed, only Barack Obama will be an outlaw")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: dangus
The Marxists have been systematically tearing down our nation for years and years. They want to destroy everything we stand for.

Cruz is my choice because his deep knowledge of our Constitution, and dedication to our founding principles, make him the best choice to attempt to repair all the damage that's been done.

That said-IMO Donald Trump has been a great benefit to this election.

He has fought a one man war against the MSM and political correctness .

He has also forced them to focus on issues they want to ignore.

Just my two cents.

223 posted on 12/24/2015 10:38:53 AM PST by Pajamajan ( Pray for our nation. Thank the Lord for everything you have. Don't wait. Do it today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Axeslinger
Hillary will clean trumps clock. She's been around the game enough to know how to play it and she has sympathetic media. She will play the vag card, she already has with the schlong comment. That is just the first plank in the misogynist platform that she'll build...and squishes the country over will swoon and lap it up. Count on it, you're already seeing it starting.

Like I said - 17 years of freeping down the drain.

Hillary The Liar is on the ropes, and Trump is schlonging the stuffing out of her.

224 posted on 12/24/2015 10:39:03 AM PST by kiryandil ("When Muslims in the White House are outlawed, only Barack Obama will be an outlaw")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]

To: Lion Den Dan

**snicker** :)


225 posted on 12/24/2015 10:42:18 AM PST by kiryandil ("When Muslims in the White House are outlawed, only Barack Obama will be an outlaw")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies]

To: dangus

Well, I have painfully perused the first two pages of replies - and it is much as I expected. A lot of air-pumping... a lot of fantastic (as in fantasy) pronouncements, a whole lot of rah rah populism, and some dreamy-eyed idolatry...

Not a single answer based in reason and principle... An answer requiring thought... Not one. It’s all emoting, all the time.

What is truly amazing to me is how many there are that have discarded Conservatism altogether... That does make sense in that Trump cannot be defended by Conservative principles, nor does he stand upon them. No one defends his record, relying solely upon his promises on the stage... Promises typical to populists, which mean exactly nothing. Vaporware. That so many are so doe-eyed is a caution.

But, you can take solace in the statistical fact that the clamoring voice on FR is usually wrong.


226 posted on 12/24/2015 10:43:24 AM PST by roamer_1 (Globalism is just Socialism in a business suit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver

Yes Cruz is a socialist. I see him supporting the continuation of socialist programs.


227 posted on 12/24/2015 10:43:54 AM PST by CodeToad (Islam should be banned and treated as a criminal enterprise!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: FreeReign

yawn


228 posted on 12/24/2015 10:44:07 AM PST by kiryandil ("When Muslims in the White House are outlawed, only Barack Obama will be an outlaw")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 205 | View Replies]

To: dangus

Why are FReepers rallying around a crony socialist?
Because Lindsey Graham quit the race.... : )


229 posted on 12/24/2015 10:46:29 AM PST by minnesota_bound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

Merry Christmas to all Freepers great and small. Some being greater than others. :-)


230 posted on 12/24/2015 10:47:30 AM PST by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies]

To: C. Edmund Wright
be sure to catch my feature series on Breitbart......(and btw, the left has come for me....)

C. Wrong, I've been posting about Media Players on Free Republic since the beginning of the impeachment wars.

You never even made my radar. That means you ain't written anything worth reading.

Now, I've seen your name around here, but there was never any fire attached to your words. You would have at least got a tick or two next to your name.

You better up your game. :)

231 posted on 12/24/2015 10:49:52 AM PST by kiryandil ("When Muslims in the White House are outlawed, only Barack Obama will be an outlaw")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 211 | View Replies]

To: dangus

The fact of the matter is this, if Trump wasn’t running Jeb would be the Republican Nominee and Hillary would be busy picking out the Oval Office Drapes. Your Post does nothing to change that fact.

The Republican Party has done nothing for its Base. They made Trump with help from their BFF Ovomit. Many of those Republican Politicians on stage have helped create the mess that Trump Supporters have had enough of.

Perhaps they should be target of scorn, not Trump. For all his faults and past Opinions, he didn’t create this mess.

For me it’s Cruz first, Trump second. The only question is, which one of those Men can get support from enough Voters outside the Republican Party bubble to win the Presidency.

That remains to be seen, but Trump currently has that advantage. Of course, everything is subject to revision.


232 posted on 12/24/2015 10:50:53 AM PST by Kickass Conservative (Obama, unable to call a Spade a Spade...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dangus

I’m not going to call you an idiot. I’ll just idly wonder if you cry yourself to sleep every night.


233 posted on 12/24/2015 10:52:19 AM PST by gogeo (If you are Tea Party, the GOPee does not want you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dangus

Reason is simple. How a candidate believes is useless if he goes along to get along or if he can be in any way bought or threatened or put in a box because he owes donors or dealmakers.

His great conservative beliefs once in there are as useful to him (and us) as a wish, after you step off a cliff, that you could go back onto land.

We are shut out of a tyrannical two party government that rules us. The only way to attempt - which is all we got as we are now serfs - getting a govt for, by, and of the People is for a billionaire, an independently wealthy person, with balls of steel and no family member unprotected, to get in there for us. If they love the country and want to do this, it’s our only hope.

Your thinking is correct for the 20th century elections, but today we are owned and we need a coup. How they feel on issues is non applicable.


234 posted on 12/24/2015 10:55:49 AM PST by Yaelle (Since PC is not actually "correct," it should be renamed Political Pandering.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dangus

I have a question that somebody here may be able to answer; why has there been so little acknowledgement of Trump’s hosting Celebrity Apprentice as instrumental to his popularity? I never watched the show, so I don’t know whether he is just playing the same character on a larger stage. I am guessing that he draws minority support like no other Republican candidate because viewers of that show saw him dealing with minority apprentices in an even-handed way and that ,overall, people experienced him as fair and wise about decisions he made( if that was his role, I don’t know).


235 posted on 12/24/2015 10:56:52 AM PST by gusopol3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

Laz, if someone doesn’t want to understand, there’s nothing you can do to stop them.


236 posted on 12/24/2015 10:58:55 AM PST by gogeo (If you are Tea Party, the GOPee does not want you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: kiryandil
Exactly. It won't matter though.

yawn

LOL!

237 posted on 12/24/2015 11:15:49 AM PST by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 228 | View Replies]

To: dangus

It was the cost of doing stuff in the big liberal city. Bribes, favors and high fees are common.


238 posted on 12/24/2015 11:17:16 AM PST by A CA Guy ( God Bless America, God Bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: majormaturity
This was pointed out to Rush the other day, he got flustered and responded with a straw man argument that completely failed to address the issue the caller raised.

I've been a true dittohead since the days when he was weekends only, but even I could see his response was totally inadequate. My greatest fear is that the 'true con' in this race is not quite as anti-establishment as he would appear.

239 posted on 12/24/2015 11:33:14 AM PST by Company Man (Trump towers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: kiryandil

your insane jealousy is plain for all to see.....

BTW, who are you? Oh wait, no one cares


240 posted on 12/24/2015 11:47:59 AM PST by C. Edmund Wright (WTF? How Karl Rove and the Establishment Lost...Again (Amazon Best Seller))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 231 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 321-326 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson