Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Elon Musk On Why First Moon Landing Was An 'Anomaly'
benzinga.com ^ | 11/27/2022 | Shivdeep Dhaliwal

Posted on 11/29/2022 7:29:23 PM PST by bitt

SpaceX and Tesla Inc TSLA CEO Elon Musk said recently that the 1969 Apollo 11 Moon-landing mission was an “anomalous situation.”

What Happened: “The fact that we were able to go to the Moon in '69 was such an anomalous situation, it was like reaching into the future and bringing the technology forward,” said Musk on the "Full Send" podcast.

The landings, which saw Neil Armstrong become the first human to step on the lunar surface, were “not the natural pace of technology development,” according to the SpaceX founder.

“It’s just that the United States just collectively decided that this has got to be done,” Musk said, referring to the space race between the U.S. and the Soviet Union.

Why It Matters: Musk agreed with the podcast hosts that it was “weird” that the U.S. had not returned to the Moon’s surface since 1972.

"We’ll go to the Moon, SpaceX has an asset contract to take astronauts to the Moon," Musk said, adding that SpaceX’s super-heavy-lift launch vehicle Starship is “gigantic compared to anything that’s been done before.”

“It’s capable of putting 100 tons of payload on the Moon. You could build a Moon base with a Starship.”

Musk said, “We could go way beyond what was done with the Apollo program, where they had a small lander.”

SpaceX would take astronauts to the Moon before it took them to Mars, the billionaire entrepreneur said.

"I think we should build a city on the Moon and on Mars."


TOPICS: Astronomy; Business/Economy; Science; Travel
KEYWORDS: anomaly; apollo; astronomy; elonmusk; mars; moon; moonlanding; musk; science; spaceexploration; spacex; starlink; tesla; themoon
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-102 next last
To: jimtorr

The underlying issue was building ICBM rockets.


41 posted on 11/29/2022 8:45:51 PM PST by Fledermaus (It's time to get rid of the Three McStooges; Mitch, Kevin and Ronna!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: bitt
Mars ain't the kind of place to raise your kids
In fact it's cold as hell
And there's no one there to raise them if you did

42 posted on 11/29/2022 8:46:28 PM PST by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt
While the Saturn V rocket was in testing, Wernher von Braun gave lectures and made videos in which he stated that the US would have to build a much more powerful rocket than anything in existence at the time (~'61-'62) to feasibly bring man to the moon.

In the years that followed, he laid plans for such a rocket, but that project was cancelled when the time schedule and budget grew out of control. No other more powerful booster was completed before Apollo 8, the three-manned mission that was claimed to have circled moon in a vehicle that was essentially the same as that which would be called Apollo 11.

Did Wernher get it wrong? Did Nixon and the desire to win the Cold War with the Soviets change the US and NASA's space plans that Wernher couldn't have contemplate? Why wasn't that someone else, whose vision must have outstripped Wernher's to be able to use Saturn V to do the Apollo moon missions put in charge of the has-been Von Braun?

No, Wernher wasn't replaced and no other rocket science genius took over. Hmmm.

Apollo 11 images such as this one below show a necessary lunar excursion wardrobe change that could not have occurred and was never claimed:

Then there are internal contradictions such as these among the official Apollo 11 photo imagery:

Here's the official NASA spokesman Donald R. Pettit, Ph.D. explaining why we haven't been able to go back to the moon for 50 years:

Priceless!

43 posted on 11/29/2022 8:46:37 PM PST by rx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scrambler Bob

“I think we should build a city on the Moon and on Mars.”
= = =

And the roads will be full of electric cars.

Rocket packs, wernt we promised rocket packs?


44 posted on 11/29/2022 8:47:48 PM PST by Gasshog (Too often, my cursor jumps to a place I didn’t intend for it to jump and the typing contin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: who_would_fardels_bear
If we had a permanent base on the Moon, what would be its purpose?

Astronomers on Earth would have to periodically check if the people up there were mooning us.


45 posted on 11/29/2022 8:48:22 PM PST by magooey (The Mandate of Heaven resides in the hearts of men.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: bitt
Why It Matters: Musk agreed with the podcast hosts that it was “weird” that the U.S. had not returned to the Moon’s surface since 1972.

No, it's not all that weird - Musk was right when he said the US landing on the moon was what was weird. There's simply been no financial or political incentive to return to the moon. Now, in 2022, we have private corporations seeking to establish bases on the moon for financial profit - that gives us a sustainable reason to go to the moon and stay there.
46 posted on 11/29/2022 8:58:08 PM PST by AnotherUnixGeek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bubba_Leroy

That’s not quite true, the Apollo spacecraft itself, the Lunar module, the Command module, had little computing power, because of size and weight considerations.

The navigational computing power responsible was actually back on Earth, occupying entire floors at the MOC. They had some pretty heavy duty computing power available, but the results of all that number crunching had to be read up to the astronauts with manual input on the DSKY.


47 posted on 11/29/2022 9:04:07 PM PST by Freedom4US
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: BobL

Well they wanted it that way - being able to independently navigate (if necessary) without benefit of comms with ground control was one of those things set in stone early on. One of the practical reasons were fears that the Soviet Union might try to hack the radio frequencies used to send and receive data back and forth from the earth to moon.

Buzz Aldrin on the first attempt wasn’t simple luck of the draw, he wrote his doctoral dissertation on lunar orbit rendezvous, if something went wrong, Buzz will get you home with a #2 Ticonderoga and some scrap paper.


48 posted on 11/29/2022 9:10:11 PM PST by Freedom4US
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: who_would_fardels_bear

Entertainment. Same purpose as hookers, but we spend a lot more on them.


49 posted on 11/29/2022 9:11:38 PM PST by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Gasshog

Flying cars. (And electricity, “too cheap to meter”)

Yeah, they pulled the rug on all that, huh? The Jet Packs were too early, they only had about 60 second flight time. The Army messed around with them a little bit, but couldn’t come up with any use for them due to limited flight time. There are vintage Jet Packs on display (or were) at the Army Transportation Museum, located at Ft. Eustis, VA.


50 posted on 11/29/2022 9:14:59 PM PST by Freedom4US
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Freedom4US

Outstanding! Didn’t know the Soviet end of it, but I do remember that the Soviets did congratulate us some point right around the Apollo 11 launch...classy of them, considering how hard each side tried.


51 posted on 11/29/2022 9:16:47 PM PST by BobL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: doorgunner69; All

Nixon, in his strange narrow way, despised the space program as a ‘democrat’ thing and just cancelled the last three missions to ‘save’ a few million dollars in budget numbers game playing. Nixon hated private firearms ownership and never even bothered to look at the staffing papers on the negatives of the EPA mandate. He just wanted a evening news headline just like he used the POW issue as a domestic political football. And yes the norks did keep some (now dead) prisoners as holdbacks to guarantee the big ‘loan’ RN promised them for ‘making peace’ would be delivered on. It wasn’t (Tricky never meant to, and the POWs the norks had were killed). This is still the biggest Beltwayland scandal that remains hidden. Some day when all of the principles are long dead some nork will write a blockbuster revelation about what great grandpa was involved in with Tricky and Kissinger.


52 posted on 11/29/2022 9:24:02 PM PST by robowombat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: bigbob; noiseman

The giants still live among us

https://www.mathworks.com/company/newsletters/articles/the-apollo-11-moon-landing-spacecraft-design-then-and-now.html


53 posted on 11/29/2022 9:27:24 PM PST by Regulator (It's fraud, Jim)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Army Air Corps

Thanks. I did see it.🚀


54 posted on 11/29/2022 9:39:11 PM PST by rktman (Destroy America from within? Check! WTH? Enlisted USN 1967 to end up with this? 😕)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: who_would_fardels_bear

The moon would serve as an antenna array for communications and make it easier in war to kill the enemy.


55 posted on 11/29/2022 9:40:52 PM PST by Jumper ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: bitt

Not one to mock progress or innovative accomplishment. However revisiting the moon and establishing a permanent presence of humans will be enormously expensive. What will be the return to justify the cost? When the huge sums were committed to build, launch, man and maintain a permanent orbiting space station, it was not only exciting but the claim was that the “science” performed on the lab would bring huge benefits and insights to mankind? So far there have been no such accomplishments or obvious return on the huge investments. Philosophically the moon landings were important because they showed that mankind had the intelligence and capability to achieve such a feat. Little doubt that it has the capability to establish a moon station and possibly go to Mars. However is it wise to do so? Perhaps it is but the taxpayer supported effort should be debated thoroughly.


56 posted on 11/29/2022 9:45:50 PM PST by allendale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BobL; poinq
They did have computers, but primitive as hell, and it took super-human skills to squeeze the code to fit the tiny memory.

Yes. Their computers were extremely rudimentary but mostly worked.

Remember, when the Eagle was landing Armstrong and Aldrin kept calling out a certain number over and over. It was the computer buffer overload code so Armstrong took over and manually flew the Eagle to touchdown. Because of the terrain they had only a few seconds of fuel left to burn at touchdown and that is why Mission Control said they had a lot of people breathing again.

57 posted on 11/29/2022 9:47:27 PM PST by OldMissileer (Atlas, Titan, Minuteman, PK. Winners of the Cold War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: bitt

What was anomalous was allowing the technology to be lost.🙄


58 posted on 11/29/2022 9:57:56 PM PST by BiteYourSelf ( Earth first, we'll strip mine the other planets later.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ

They didn’t have computing power of a modern day programmable calculator.🤔


59 posted on 11/29/2022 10:00:16 PM PST by BiteYourSelf ( Earth first, we'll strip mine the other planets later.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: poinq

Actually they did have crude computers on board.🤔


60 posted on 11/29/2022 10:02:29 PM PST by BiteYourSelf ( Earth first, we'll strip mine the other planets later.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-102 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson